Problem in getting the IDE disk controller driver working with linux kernel version 4.15.13





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I am currently upgrading the Linux kernel version on one of our hardware boards from 2.6.17 to 4.15.13. We have a NAND flash controller from greenliant which supports PATA interface. The IDE controller driver support for this controller was available in the older kernel version under drivers/ide/ and we have been successfully using it on our board. The new kernel also has the support for this controller although the kernel documentation suggests it is no longer maintained and instead the use of the new libata driver is encouraged. However, we decided to use the old driver code available in the new kernel.



In the past, the driver was accepting the IOPORTS and IRQ number as arguments using the "option=" command line argument to the ide-core driver. Hence we passed the non-standard values to the driver for IOPORTS and IRQ. The new kernel source does not have support for this argument. Instead it uses the standard IOPORTS and IRQ values. I modified the kernel source to use our older non-standard IOPORT and IRQ values. But the driver is not able to detect the IDE Flash controller. I continue to get 0xFF status and as a result I cannot mount a filesystem on the 2GB flash disk used in the system using the controller.



Can somebody let me know what else I need to do in order to get the driver code in the new 4.15 kernel working for the flash controller?



Thanks,



Sachin.










share|improve this question





























    0















    I am currently upgrading the Linux kernel version on one of our hardware boards from 2.6.17 to 4.15.13. We have a NAND flash controller from greenliant which supports PATA interface. The IDE controller driver support for this controller was available in the older kernel version under drivers/ide/ and we have been successfully using it on our board. The new kernel also has the support for this controller although the kernel documentation suggests it is no longer maintained and instead the use of the new libata driver is encouraged. However, we decided to use the old driver code available in the new kernel.



    In the past, the driver was accepting the IOPORTS and IRQ number as arguments using the "option=" command line argument to the ide-core driver. Hence we passed the non-standard values to the driver for IOPORTS and IRQ. The new kernel source does not have support for this argument. Instead it uses the standard IOPORTS and IRQ values. I modified the kernel source to use our older non-standard IOPORT and IRQ values. But the driver is not able to detect the IDE Flash controller. I continue to get 0xFF status and as a result I cannot mount a filesystem on the 2GB flash disk used in the system using the controller.



    Can somebody let me know what else I need to do in order to get the driver code in the new 4.15 kernel working for the flash controller?



    Thanks,



    Sachin.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I am currently upgrading the Linux kernel version on one of our hardware boards from 2.6.17 to 4.15.13. We have a NAND flash controller from greenliant which supports PATA interface. The IDE controller driver support for this controller was available in the older kernel version under drivers/ide/ and we have been successfully using it on our board. The new kernel also has the support for this controller although the kernel documentation suggests it is no longer maintained and instead the use of the new libata driver is encouraged. However, we decided to use the old driver code available in the new kernel.



      In the past, the driver was accepting the IOPORTS and IRQ number as arguments using the "option=" command line argument to the ide-core driver. Hence we passed the non-standard values to the driver for IOPORTS and IRQ. The new kernel source does not have support for this argument. Instead it uses the standard IOPORTS and IRQ values. I modified the kernel source to use our older non-standard IOPORT and IRQ values. But the driver is not able to detect the IDE Flash controller. I continue to get 0xFF status and as a result I cannot mount a filesystem on the 2GB flash disk used in the system using the controller.



      Can somebody let me know what else I need to do in order to get the driver code in the new 4.15 kernel working for the flash controller?



      Thanks,



      Sachin.










      share|improve this question














      I am currently upgrading the Linux kernel version on one of our hardware boards from 2.6.17 to 4.15.13. We have a NAND flash controller from greenliant which supports PATA interface. The IDE controller driver support for this controller was available in the older kernel version under drivers/ide/ and we have been successfully using it on our board. The new kernel also has the support for this controller although the kernel documentation suggests it is no longer maintained and instead the use of the new libata driver is encouraged. However, we decided to use the old driver code available in the new kernel.



      In the past, the driver was accepting the IOPORTS and IRQ number as arguments using the "option=" command line argument to the ide-core driver. Hence we passed the non-standard values to the driver for IOPORTS and IRQ. The new kernel source does not have support for this argument. Instead it uses the standard IOPORTS and IRQ values. I modified the kernel source to use our older non-standard IOPORT and IRQ values. But the driver is not able to detect the IDE Flash controller. I continue to get 0xFF status and as a result I cannot mount a filesystem on the 2GB flash disk used in the system using the controller.



      Can somebody let me know what else I need to do in order to get the driver code in the new 4.15 kernel working for the flash controller?



      Thanks,



      Sachin.







      linux-kernel






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 6:31









      sgosavi1sgosavi1

      11




      11
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54034055%2fproblem-in-getting-the-ide-disk-controller-driver-working-with-linux-kernel-vers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54034055%2fproblem-in-getting-the-ide-disk-controller-driver-working-with-linux-kernel-vers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Monofisismo

          Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

          Olmecas