ActiveModel Serializer JSON Includes “attributes” Key












0















I'm using the Rails ActiveModel Serializer to output JSON to an API endpoint.



I'm getting this JSON output:



{
"data":[
{
"id":"396",
"type":"profiles",
"attributes":{
"name":"Impossibles",
"created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
"updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
"website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
}
}
]
}


But was expecting it to be formatted like this:



{
"data":[
{
"id":"396",
"type":"profiles",
"name":"Impossibles",
"created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
"updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
"website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
}
]
}


Trying to avoid the extra level of nesting in the returned JSON.
Is there a way to remove the "attributes" key?



This is my serializer:



class ProfileSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
attributes :id, :name, :created_at, :updated_at, :website
end


And my controller:



def show
profile = Profile.find(params[:id])
render json: profile, status: :ok
end









share|improve this question



























    0















    I'm using the Rails ActiveModel Serializer to output JSON to an API endpoint.



    I'm getting this JSON output:



    {
    "data":[
    {
    "id":"396",
    "type":"profiles",
    "attributes":{
    "name":"Impossibles",
    "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
    "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
    "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
    }
    }
    ]
    }


    But was expecting it to be formatted like this:



    {
    "data":[
    {
    "id":"396",
    "type":"profiles",
    "name":"Impossibles",
    "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
    "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
    "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
    }
    ]
    }


    Trying to avoid the extra level of nesting in the returned JSON.
    Is there a way to remove the "attributes" key?



    This is my serializer:



    class ProfileSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
    attributes :id, :name, :created_at, :updated_at, :website
    end


    And my controller:



    def show
    profile = Profile.find(params[:id])
    render json: profile, status: :ok
    end









    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I'm using the Rails ActiveModel Serializer to output JSON to an API endpoint.



      I'm getting this JSON output:



      {
      "data":[
      {
      "id":"396",
      "type":"profiles",
      "attributes":{
      "name":"Impossibles",
      "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
      "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
      "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
      }
      }
      ]
      }


      But was expecting it to be formatted like this:



      {
      "data":[
      {
      "id":"396",
      "type":"profiles",
      "name":"Impossibles",
      "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
      "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
      "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
      }
      ]
      }


      Trying to avoid the extra level of nesting in the returned JSON.
      Is there a way to remove the "attributes" key?



      This is my serializer:



      class ProfileSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
      attributes :id, :name, :created_at, :updated_at, :website
      end


      And my controller:



      def show
      profile = Profile.find(params[:id])
      render json: profile, status: :ok
      end









      share|improve this question














      I'm using the Rails ActiveModel Serializer to output JSON to an API endpoint.



      I'm getting this JSON output:



      {
      "data":[
      {
      "id":"396",
      "type":"profiles",
      "attributes":{
      "name":"Impossibles",
      "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
      "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
      "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
      }
      }
      ]
      }


      But was expecting it to be formatted like this:



      {
      "data":[
      {
      "id":"396",
      "type":"profiles",
      "name":"Impossibles",
      "created-at":"2017-05-11T18:14:06.201-04:00",
      "updated-at":"2018-04-01T13:34:15.905-04:00",
      "website":"http://soundcloud.com/impossibles"
      }
      ]
      }


      Trying to avoid the extra level of nesting in the returned JSON.
      Is there a way to remove the "attributes" key?



      This is my serializer:



      class ProfileSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
      attributes :id, :name, :created_at, :updated_at, :website
      end


      And my controller:



      def show
      profile = Profile.find(params[:id])
      render json: profile, status: :ok
      end






      ruby-on-rails json ruby serialization






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 30 '18 at 4:13









      coryetzkorncoryetzkorn

      4061619




      4061619
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          After reading through some GitHub issues, it appears the "attributes" nesting is coming from the JSON API spec and is expected behavior:
          https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-objects



          This issue was helpful:
          https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/2202



          Looks like a feature, not a bug.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

            – Marcin Kołodziej
            Dec 30 '18 at 4:59











          • @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

            – coryetzkorn
            Jan 2 at 14:52











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53975225%2factivemodel-serializer-json-includes-attributes-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          After reading through some GitHub issues, it appears the "attributes" nesting is coming from the JSON API spec and is expected behavior:
          https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-objects



          This issue was helpful:
          https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/2202



          Looks like a feature, not a bug.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

            – Marcin Kołodziej
            Dec 30 '18 at 4:59











          • @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

            – coryetzkorn
            Jan 2 at 14:52
















          0














          After reading through some GitHub issues, it appears the "attributes" nesting is coming from the JSON API spec and is expected behavior:
          https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-objects



          This issue was helpful:
          https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/2202



          Looks like a feature, not a bug.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

            – Marcin Kołodziej
            Dec 30 '18 at 4:59











          • @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

            – coryetzkorn
            Jan 2 at 14:52














          0












          0








          0







          After reading through some GitHub issues, it appears the "attributes" nesting is coming from the JSON API spec and is expected behavior:
          https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-objects



          This issue was helpful:
          https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/2202



          Looks like a feature, not a bug.






          share|improve this answer













          After reading through some GitHub issues, it appears the "attributes" nesting is coming from the JSON API spec and is expected behavior:
          https://jsonapi.org/format/#document-resource-objects



          This issue was helpful:
          https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/issues/2202



          Looks like a feature, not a bug.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 30 '18 at 4:25









          coryetzkorncoryetzkorn

          4061619




          4061619








          • 1





            If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

            – Marcin Kołodziej
            Dec 30 '18 at 4:59











          • @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

            – coryetzkorn
            Jan 2 at 14:52














          • 1





            If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

            – Marcin Kołodziej
            Dec 30 '18 at 4:59











          • @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

            – coryetzkorn
            Jan 2 at 14:52








          1




          1





          If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

          – Marcin Kołodziej
          Dec 30 '18 at 4:59





          If you don't want to conform to JSON API specification, you can always change your adapter to json, see here.

          – Marcin Kołodziej
          Dec 30 '18 at 4:59













          @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

          – coryetzkorn
          Jan 2 at 14:52





          @MarcinKołodziej thanks! Didn't realize there were two JSON adapters.

          – coryetzkorn
          Jan 2 at 14:52


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53975225%2factivemodel-serializer-json-includes-attributes-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mossoró

          Error while reading .h5 file using the rhdf5 package in R

          Pushsharp Apns notification error: 'InvalidToken'