How to see why a keras / tensorflow model is getting stuck?












0















My code is:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
import numpy
import pandas as pd

X = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['Type', 'Age', 'Breed1', 'Breed2', 'Gender', 'Color1', 'Color2', 'Color3', 'MaturitySize', 'FurLength', 'Vaccinated', 'Dewormed', 'Sterilized', 'Health', 'Quantity', 'Fee', 'VideoAmt', 'PhotoAmt'])
Y = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['AdoptionSpeed'])

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(18, input_dim=18, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(X, Y, epochs=150, batch_size=100)
scores = model.evaluate(X, Y)
print("n%s: %.2f%%" % (model.metrics_names[1], scores[1]*100))


I am trying to train to see how the various factors (type, age, etc) affect the AdoptionSpeed. However, the accuracy gets stuck at 20.6% and doesn't really move from there.



Epoch 2/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1539 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 3/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1591 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 4/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1626 - acc: 0.2061


...



Epoch 150/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1757 - acc: 0.2061
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 11us/step

acc: 20.61%


Is there anything I can do to nudge to get unstuck?










share|improve this question























  • Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

    – Amir
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:21













  • What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:39











  • And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

    – Daniel Möller
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:54











  • I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:51











  • @DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:53
















0















My code is:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
import numpy
import pandas as pd

X = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['Type', 'Age', 'Breed1', 'Breed2', 'Gender', 'Color1', 'Color2', 'Color3', 'MaturitySize', 'FurLength', 'Vaccinated', 'Dewormed', 'Sterilized', 'Health', 'Quantity', 'Fee', 'VideoAmt', 'PhotoAmt'])
Y = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['AdoptionSpeed'])

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(18, input_dim=18, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(X, Y, epochs=150, batch_size=100)
scores = model.evaluate(X, Y)
print("n%s: %.2f%%" % (model.metrics_names[1], scores[1]*100))


I am trying to train to see how the various factors (type, age, etc) affect the AdoptionSpeed. However, the accuracy gets stuck at 20.6% and doesn't really move from there.



Epoch 2/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1539 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 3/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1591 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 4/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1626 - acc: 0.2061


...



Epoch 150/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1757 - acc: 0.2061
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 11us/step

acc: 20.61%


Is there anything I can do to nudge to get unstuck?










share|improve this question























  • Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

    – Amir
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:21













  • What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:39











  • And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

    – Daniel Möller
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:54











  • I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:51











  • @DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:53














0












0








0








My code is:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
import numpy
import pandas as pd

X = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['Type', 'Age', 'Breed1', 'Breed2', 'Gender', 'Color1', 'Color2', 'Color3', 'MaturitySize', 'FurLength', 'Vaccinated', 'Dewormed', 'Sterilized', 'Health', 'Quantity', 'Fee', 'VideoAmt', 'PhotoAmt'])
Y = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['AdoptionSpeed'])

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(18, input_dim=18, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(X, Y, epochs=150, batch_size=100)
scores = model.evaluate(X, Y)
print("n%s: %.2f%%" % (model.metrics_names[1], scores[1]*100))


I am trying to train to see how the various factors (type, age, etc) affect the AdoptionSpeed. However, the accuracy gets stuck at 20.6% and doesn't really move from there.



Epoch 2/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1539 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 3/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1591 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 4/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1626 - acc: 0.2061


...



Epoch 150/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1757 - acc: 0.2061
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 11us/step

acc: 20.61%


Is there anything I can do to nudge to get unstuck?










share|improve this question














My code is:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
import numpy
import pandas as pd

X = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['Type', 'Age', 'Breed1', 'Breed2', 'Gender', 'Color1', 'Color2', 'Color3', 'MaturitySize', 'FurLength', 'Vaccinated', 'Dewormed', 'Sterilized', 'Health', 'Quantity', 'Fee', 'VideoAmt', 'PhotoAmt'])
Y = pd.read_csv(
"data/train.csv", usecols=['AdoptionSpeed'])

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(18, input_dim=18, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(X, Y, epochs=150, batch_size=100)
scores = model.evaluate(X, Y)
print("n%s: %.2f%%" % (model.metrics_names[1], scores[1]*100))


I am trying to train to see how the various factors (type, age, etc) affect the AdoptionSpeed. However, the accuracy gets stuck at 20.6% and doesn't really move from there.



Epoch 2/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1539 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 3/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1591 - acc: 0.2061
Epoch 4/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1626 - acc: 0.2061


...



Epoch 150/150
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 9us/step - loss: -24.1757 - acc: 0.2061
14993/14993 [==============================] - 0s 11us/step

acc: 20.61%


Is there anything I can do to nudge to get unstuck?







python tensorflow keras neural-network






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 28 '18 at 18:05









ShamoonShamoon

10.7k52163339




10.7k52163339













  • Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

    – Amir
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:21













  • What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:39











  • And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

    – Daniel Möller
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:54











  • I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:51











  • @DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:53



















  • Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

    – Amir
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:21













  • What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Dec 28 '18 at 19:39











  • And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

    – Daniel Möller
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:54











  • I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:51











  • @DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

    – Shamoon
    Dec 29 '18 at 3:53

















Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

– Amir
Dec 28 '18 at 19:21







Did you normalize your data before feeding to the network? see here for an example.

– Amir
Dec 28 '18 at 19:21















What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

– Matias Valdenegro
Dec 28 '18 at 19:39





What are the values in your Y? AdoptionSpeed sounds like a continuous value.

– Matias Valdenegro
Dec 28 '18 at 19:39













And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

– Daniel Möller
Dec 28 '18 at 20:54





And the values of the loss suggest that the speed is not between 0 and 1 (as your output is a sigmoid activation)

– Daniel Möller
Dec 28 '18 at 20:54













I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

– Shamoon
Dec 29 '18 at 3:51





I did not normalize. I guess I was somewhat hoping that keras would be able to do that? Y is days until adoption.

– Shamoon
Dec 29 '18 at 3:51













@DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

– Shamoon
Dec 29 '18 at 3:53





@DanielMöller good point. Would relu be a better output?

– Shamoon
Dec 29 '18 at 3:53












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














By the values of the loss, it seems your true data is not in the same range as the the model's output (sigmoid).



Sigmoid outputs between 0 and 1 only. So you should normalize your data in order to have it between 0 and 1. One possibility is simply divide y by y.max().



Or you can try other possibilities, considering:




  • sigmoid: between 0 and 1

  • tanh: between -1 and 1

  • relu: 0 to infinity

  • linear: -inf to +inf






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53962586%2fhow-to-see-why-a-keras-tensorflow-model-is-getting-stuck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    By the values of the loss, it seems your true data is not in the same range as the the model's output (sigmoid).



    Sigmoid outputs between 0 and 1 only. So you should normalize your data in order to have it between 0 and 1. One possibility is simply divide y by y.max().



    Or you can try other possibilities, considering:




    • sigmoid: between 0 and 1

    • tanh: between -1 and 1

    • relu: 0 to infinity

    • linear: -inf to +inf






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      By the values of the loss, it seems your true data is not in the same range as the the model's output (sigmoid).



      Sigmoid outputs between 0 and 1 only. So you should normalize your data in order to have it between 0 and 1. One possibility is simply divide y by y.max().



      Or you can try other possibilities, considering:




      • sigmoid: between 0 and 1

      • tanh: between -1 and 1

      • relu: 0 to infinity

      • linear: -inf to +inf






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        By the values of the loss, it seems your true data is not in the same range as the the model's output (sigmoid).



        Sigmoid outputs between 0 and 1 only. So you should normalize your data in order to have it between 0 and 1. One possibility is simply divide y by y.max().



        Or you can try other possibilities, considering:




        • sigmoid: between 0 and 1

        • tanh: between -1 and 1

        • relu: 0 to infinity

        • linear: -inf to +inf






        share|improve this answer













        By the values of the loss, it seems your true data is not in the same range as the the model's output (sigmoid).



        Sigmoid outputs between 0 and 1 only. So you should normalize your data in order to have it between 0 and 1. One possibility is simply divide y by y.max().



        Or you can try other possibilities, considering:




        • sigmoid: between 0 and 1

        • tanh: between -1 and 1

        • relu: 0 to infinity

        • linear: -inf to +inf







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 29 '18 at 5:39









        Daniel MöllerDaniel Möller

        33.6k663103




        33.6k663103






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53962586%2fhow-to-see-why-a-keras-tensorflow-model-is-getting-stuck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Monofisismo

            Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

            Olmecas