Android target SDK moved from 26 to 28, error: The specified child already has a parent. You must call...












2















On our project, we have some downtime and decided to update the project target SDK version from API 26 to API 28. The project builds and works somewhat fine. The problem that we have is that we get this error when we switch back to a fragment that is in the back stack:




The specified child already has a parent. You must call removeView() on the child's parent first.




We have a class called BaseNavigationController that is a fragment and manages our nested fragments. We use the getChildFragmentManager and we set the setCustomAnimations with enter, exit, popEnter and popExit values.



The error "disappears" when we set the duration of all the animation to the exact same length. But that it persist if we remove the setCustomAnimations from the transaction.



getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
.setCustomAnimations(enter, exit, popEnter, popExit)
.addToBackStack(null)
.replace(R.id.main_container, controller, tag)
.commit();


I haven't found any proper solution to this problem. One hack is to remove the view in the onDestroyView method in the base fragment. But then we get an empty screen on the enter animation from the back stack. The other one is that we use the getFragmentManager method but then the fragment nesting doesn`t work correctly.










share|improve this question





























    2















    On our project, we have some downtime and decided to update the project target SDK version from API 26 to API 28. The project builds and works somewhat fine. The problem that we have is that we get this error when we switch back to a fragment that is in the back stack:




    The specified child already has a parent. You must call removeView() on the child's parent first.




    We have a class called BaseNavigationController that is a fragment and manages our nested fragments. We use the getChildFragmentManager and we set the setCustomAnimations with enter, exit, popEnter and popExit values.



    The error "disappears" when we set the duration of all the animation to the exact same length. But that it persist if we remove the setCustomAnimations from the transaction.



    getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
    .setCustomAnimations(enter, exit, popEnter, popExit)
    .addToBackStack(null)
    .replace(R.id.main_container, controller, tag)
    .commit();


    I haven't found any proper solution to this problem. One hack is to remove the view in the onDestroyView method in the base fragment. But then we get an empty screen on the enter animation from the back stack. The other one is that we use the getFragmentManager method but then the fragment nesting doesn`t work correctly.










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      On our project, we have some downtime and decided to update the project target SDK version from API 26 to API 28. The project builds and works somewhat fine. The problem that we have is that we get this error when we switch back to a fragment that is in the back stack:




      The specified child already has a parent. You must call removeView() on the child's parent first.




      We have a class called BaseNavigationController that is a fragment and manages our nested fragments. We use the getChildFragmentManager and we set the setCustomAnimations with enter, exit, popEnter and popExit values.



      The error "disappears" when we set the duration of all the animation to the exact same length. But that it persist if we remove the setCustomAnimations from the transaction.



      getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
      .setCustomAnimations(enter, exit, popEnter, popExit)
      .addToBackStack(null)
      .replace(R.id.main_container, controller, tag)
      .commit();


      I haven't found any proper solution to this problem. One hack is to remove the view in the onDestroyView method in the base fragment. But then we get an empty screen on the enter animation from the back stack. The other one is that we use the getFragmentManager method but then the fragment nesting doesn`t work correctly.










      share|improve this question
















      On our project, we have some downtime and decided to update the project target SDK version from API 26 to API 28. The project builds and works somewhat fine. The problem that we have is that we get this error when we switch back to a fragment that is in the back stack:




      The specified child already has a parent. You must call removeView() on the child's parent first.




      We have a class called BaseNavigationController that is a fragment and manages our nested fragments. We use the getChildFragmentManager and we set the setCustomAnimations with enter, exit, popEnter and popExit values.



      The error "disappears" when we set the duration of all the animation to the exact same length. But that it persist if we remove the setCustomAnimations from the transaction.



      getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
      .setCustomAnimations(enter, exit, popEnter, popExit)
      .addToBackStack(null)
      .replace(R.id.main_container, controller, tag)
      .commit();


      I haven't found any proper solution to this problem. One hack is to remove the view in the onDestroyView method in the base fragment. But then we get an empty screen on the enter animation from the back stack. The other one is that we use the getFragmentManager method but then the fragment nesting doesn`t work correctly.







      android android-fragments fragmentmanager






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 2 at 5:17









      shizhen

      3,68641234




      3,68641234










      asked Jan 2 at 4:05









      AaBoyAaBoy

      285




      285
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54001068%2fandroid-target-sdk-moved-from-26-to-28-error-the-specified-child-already-has-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54001068%2fandroid-target-sdk-moved-from-26-to-28-error-the-specified-child-already-has-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Monofisismo

          Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

          Olmecas