Why Does Windows Have Duplicate Performance Counters












0















I was looking into a bug where PdhLookupPerfNameByIndex was giving me a buffer size of 0 and discovered that there are 2 counters for "% Processor Time" and we were using the last one in the list (index 6 and 4676). The spanish language pack only has this counter once (index 6). I was curious as to why there would be 2 counters for the same thing in English and if there was a valid reason, why is it not included in the Spanish language pack.



Using Windows Server 2012 R2










share|improve this question























  • Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

    – Hans Passant
    Jan 3 at 18:19











  • They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

    – TreeWater
    Jan 3 at 23:56
















0















I was looking into a bug where PdhLookupPerfNameByIndex was giving me a buffer size of 0 and discovered that there are 2 counters for "% Processor Time" and we were using the last one in the list (index 6 and 4676). The spanish language pack only has this counter once (index 6). I was curious as to why there would be 2 counters for the same thing in English and if there was a valid reason, why is it not included in the Spanish language pack.



Using Windows Server 2012 R2










share|improve this question























  • Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

    – Hans Passant
    Jan 3 at 18:19











  • They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

    – TreeWater
    Jan 3 at 23:56














0












0








0








I was looking into a bug where PdhLookupPerfNameByIndex was giving me a buffer size of 0 and discovered that there are 2 counters for "% Processor Time" and we were using the last one in the list (index 6 and 4676). The spanish language pack only has this counter once (index 6). I was curious as to why there would be 2 counters for the same thing in English and if there was a valid reason, why is it not included in the Spanish language pack.



Using Windows Server 2012 R2










share|improve this question














I was looking into a bug where PdhLookupPerfNameByIndex was giving me a buffer size of 0 and discovered that there are 2 counters for "% Processor Time" and we were using the last one in the list (index 6 and 4676). The spanish language pack only has this counter once (index 6). I was curious as to why there would be 2 counters for the same thing in English and if there was a valid reason, why is it not included in the Spanish language pack.



Using Windows Server 2012 R2







windows windows-server-2012-r2 performancecounter






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 3 at 17:03









TreeWaterTreeWater

31




31













  • Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

    – Hans Passant
    Jan 3 at 18:19











  • They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

    – TreeWater
    Jan 3 at 23:56



















  • Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

    – Hans Passant
    Jan 3 at 18:19











  • They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

    – TreeWater
    Jan 3 at 23:56

















Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

– Hans Passant
Jan 3 at 18:19





Different categories, "Processor" vs "Processor Information". stackoverflow.com/a/23392347/17034

– Hans Passant
Jan 3 at 18:19













They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

– TreeWater
Jan 3 at 23:56





They aren't though. As I stated there are 2 indices for "% Processor Time". I am not using "Processor" or "Processor Information"

– TreeWater
Jan 3 at 23:56












0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54026689%2fwhy-does-windows-have-duplicate-performance-counters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54026689%2fwhy-does-windows-have-duplicate-performance-counters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Monofisismo

Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

Olmecas