Why is the interleave_view missing in the range-v3 library?












0















In Eric Niebler's range-v3 calendar example he uses interleave followed by chunk to transpose a matrix.



I wonder why interleave is not part of the range-v3 library...










share|improve this question

























  • you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

    – Joey Mallone
    Jan 3 at 12:49








  • 5





    See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

    – Holt
    Jan 3 at 12:50
















0















In Eric Niebler's range-v3 calendar example he uses interleave followed by chunk to transpose a matrix.



I wonder why interleave is not part of the range-v3 library...










share|improve this question

























  • you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

    – Joey Mallone
    Jan 3 at 12:49








  • 5





    See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

    – Holt
    Jan 3 at 12:50














0












0








0








In Eric Niebler's range-v3 calendar example he uses interleave followed by chunk to transpose a matrix.



I wonder why interleave is not part of the range-v3 library...










share|improve this question
















In Eric Niebler's range-v3 calendar example he uses interleave followed by chunk to transpose a matrix.



I wonder why interleave is not part of the range-v3 library...







c++ range-v3






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 19:16









marc_s

583k13011241270




583k13011241270










asked Jan 3 at 12:36









Porsche9IIPorsche9II

859




859













  • you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

    – Joey Mallone
    Jan 3 at 12:49








  • 5





    See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

    – Holt
    Jan 3 at 12:50



















  • you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

    – Joey Mallone
    Jan 3 at 12:49








  • 5





    See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

    – Holt
    Jan 3 at 12:50

















you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

– Joey Mallone
Jan 3 at 12:49







you can raise that issue with Eric Niebler here. Better yet you can even fork from his library and implement the function yourself. Hence the power of open-source software.

– Joey Mallone
Jan 3 at 12:49






5




5





See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

– Holt
Jan 3 at 12:50





See github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/776

– Holt
Jan 3 at 12:50












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Lack of time, and some unsolved design difficulties. For instance, what does it mean to interleave ranges of different lengths? That wasn't a problem in the calendar example, but it's a question that needs to have an answer before the interleave view can be part of range-v3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 16:47













  • Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 17:03











  • That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

    – Eric Niebler
    Jan 3 at 21:06












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022430%2fwhy-is-the-interleave-view-missing-in-the-range-v3-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Lack of time, and some unsolved design difficulties. For instance, what does it mean to interleave ranges of different lengths? That wasn't a problem in the calendar example, but it's a question that needs to have an answer before the interleave view can be part of range-v3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 16:47













  • Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 17:03











  • That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

    – Eric Niebler
    Jan 3 at 21:06
















2














Lack of time, and some unsolved design difficulties. For instance, what does it mean to interleave ranges of different lengths? That wasn't a problem in the calendar example, but it's a question that needs to have an answer before the interleave view can be part of range-v3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 16:47













  • Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 17:03











  • That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

    – Eric Niebler
    Jan 3 at 21:06














2












2








2







Lack of time, and some unsolved design difficulties. For instance, what does it mean to interleave ranges of different lengths? That wasn't a problem in the calendar example, but it's a question that needs to have an answer before the interleave view can be part of range-v3.






share|improve this answer













Lack of time, and some unsolved design difficulties. For instance, what does it mean to interleave ranges of different lengths? That wasn't a problem in the calendar example, but it's a question that needs to have an answer before the interleave view can be part of range-v3.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 3 at 16:01









Eric NieblerEric Niebler

3,7701431




3,7701431













  • Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 16:47













  • Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 17:03











  • That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

    – Eric Niebler
    Jan 3 at 21:06



















  • Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 16:47













  • Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

    – Porsche9II
    Jan 3 at 17:03











  • That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

    – Eric Niebler
    Jan 3 at 21:06

















Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

– Porsche9II
Jan 3 at 16:47







Thank you for the clarification - for my purposes I want to transpose a matrix - so all ranges have the same lengths. I copied your interleave_view from the calender example to link. Unfortunately, the direct transpose via vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix = m_x_n_matrix | interleave() | chunk(n_cols); is slower than vector<int> vec_temp = m_x_n_matrix | interleave(); vector<vector<int>> n_x_m_matrix_fast = vec_temp | chunk(n_cols);

– Porsche9II
Jan 3 at 16:47















Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

– Porsche9II
Jan 3 at 17:03





Interleave for ranges of different size: I would suggest that [1, 2, 3, 4],[a, b, c],[I, II, III, IV, V]] interleaves to [1, a, I, 2, b, II, 3, c, III, 4, IV, V].

– Porsche9II
Jan 3 at 17:03













That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

– Eric Niebler
Jan 3 at 21:06





That is a sensible way to interleave ranges of different sizes, but implementing that comes with runtime cost, if I remember correctly.

– Eric Niebler
Jan 3 at 21:06




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022430%2fwhy-is-the-interleave-view-missing-in-the-range-v3-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

Olmecas

Can't read property showImagePicker of undefined in react native iOS