Should the longer synonyms for local variables be used in a Makefile?
In make (I am using OpenBSD's implementation, but I suppose the question is relevant for GNU make as well), we have the following so called local variables
@ The name of the target
% The name of the archive member (for library rules)
! The name of the archive file (for library rules)
? The list of prerequisites for this target that were deemed out of date
< The name of the prerequisite from which this target is to be built (for inference rules)
* The file prefix of the file, containing only the file portion, no suffix or preceding directory components
(roughly from man make on OpenBSD)
These local variables have synonyms: for exampe, .IMPSRC for < or .TARGET for @. The manual for FreeBSD's says these longer versions are preferred. OpenBSD's man page mentions no such thing, but says these longer names are an extension.
Is it better to use to longer names? Which is better for compatibility? Are both POSIX?
unix makefile gnu-make bsd
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
add a comment |
In make (I am using OpenBSD's implementation, but I suppose the question is relevant for GNU make as well), we have the following so called local variables
@ The name of the target
% The name of the archive member (for library rules)
! The name of the archive file (for library rules)
? The list of prerequisites for this target that were deemed out of date
< The name of the prerequisite from which this target is to be built (for inference rules)
* The file prefix of the file, containing only the file portion, no suffix or preceding directory components
(roughly from man make on OpenBSD)
These local variables have synonyms: for exampe, .IMPSRC for < or .TARGET for @. The manual for FreeBSD's says these longer versions are preferred. OpenBSD's man page mentions no such thing, but says these longer names are an extension.
Is it better to use to longer names? Which is better for compatibility? Are both POSIX?
unix makefile gnu-make bsd
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
add a comment |
In make (I am using OpenBSD's implementation, but I suppose the question is relevant for GNU make as well), we have the following so called local variables
@ The name of the target
% The name of the archive member (for library rules)
! The name of the archive file (for library rules)
? The list of prerequisites for this target that were deemed out of date
< The name of the prerequisite from which this target is to be built (for inference rules)
* The file prefix of the file, containing only the file portion, no suffix or preceding directory components
(roughly from man make on OpenBSD)
These local variables have synonyms: for exampe, .IMPSRC for < or .TARGET for @. The manual for FreeBSD's says these longer versions are preferred. OpenBSD's man page mentions no such thing, but says these longer names are an extension.
Is it better to use to longer names? Which is better for compatibility? Are both POSIX?
unix makefile gnu-make bsd
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
In make (I am using OpenBSD's implementation, but I suppose the question is relevant for GNU make as well), we have the following so called local variables
@ The name of the target
% The name of the archive member (for library rules)
! The name of the archive file (for library rules)
? The list of prerequisites for this target that were deemed out of date
< The name of the prerequisite from which this target is to be built (for inference rules)
* The file prefix of the file, containing only the file portion, no suffix or preceding directory components
(roughly from man make on OpenBSD)
These local variables have synonyms: for exampe, .IMPSRC for < or .TARGET for @. The manual for FreeBSD's says these longer versions are preferred. OpenBSD's man page mentions no such thing, but says these longer names are an extension.
Is it better to use to longer names? Which is better for compatibility? Are both POSIX?
unix makefile gnu-make bsd
unix makefile gnu-make bsd
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
asked Jan 3 at 12:41
bertalanp99bertalanp99
1716
1716
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Those variables are called automatic variables in GNU make and internal variables in the POSIX standard.
The long names for these are purely BSD make inventions, they do not exist in any other version of make (such as GNU make) and they are not mentioned in the POSIX standard for make.
It's up to you whether you want to use them, but they are completely non-portable. Of course you could always define them yourself if you wanted to implement a compatibility layer.
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022501%2fshould-the-longer-synonyms-for-local-variables-be-used-in-a-makefile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Those variables are called automatic variables in GNU make and internal variables in the POSIX standard.
The long names for these are purely BSD make inventions, they do not exist in any other version of make (such as GNU make) and they are not mentioned in the POSIX standard for make.
It's up to you whether you want to use them, but they are completely non-portable. Of course you could always define them yourself if you wanted to implement a compatibility layer.
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
add a comment |
Those variables are called automatic variables in GNU make and internal variables in the POSIX standard.
The long names for these are purely BSD make inventions, they do not exist in any other version of make (such as GNU make) and they are not mentioned in the POSIX standard for make.
It's up to you whether you want to use them, but they are completely non-portable. Of course you could always define them yourself if you wanted to implement a compatibility layer.
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
add a comment |
Those variables are called automatic variables in GNU make and internal variables in the POSIX standard.
The long names for these are purely BSD make inventions, they do not exist in any other version of make (such as GNU make) and they are not mentioned in the POSIX standard for make.
It's up to you whether you want to use them, but they are completely non-portable. Of course you could always define them yourself if you wanted to implement a compatibility layer.
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
Those variables are called automatic variables in GNU make and internal variables in the POSIX standard.
The long names for these are purely BSD make inventions, they do not exist in any other version of make (such as GNU make) and they are not mentioned in the POSIX standard for make.
It's up to you whether you want to use them, but they are completely non-portable. Of course you could always define them yourself if you wanted to implement a compatibility layer.
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
answered Jan 3 at 14:50
MadScientistMadScientist
47.8k55469
47.8k55469
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022501%2fshould-the-longer-synonyms-for-local-variables-be-used-in-a-makefile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
