Get the number of dict values in a nested dict












2















I have the following json object:



[{
'firstname': 'Jimmie',
'lastname': 'Barninger',
'zip_code': 12345,
'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'],
'ids': {
'44': 'OK',
'51': 'OK'
},
'address': {
'state': 'MI',
'town': 'Dearborn'
},
'other': {
'ids': {
'1': 'OK',
'103': 'OK'
},
}
}, {
'firstname': 'John',
'lastname': 'Doe',
'zip_code': 90027,
'colors': None,
'ids': {
'91': 'OK',
'103': 'OK'
},
'address': {
'state': 'CA',
'town': 'Los Angeles'
},
'other': {
'ids': {
'91': 'OK',
'103': 'OK'
},
}
}]


I would like to be able to get the number of unique key values that each dict has. In the above, the number would be:



address: 2 # ['state', 'town']
ids: 4 # ['44', '51', '91', '103']
other.ids 3 # ['1', '103', '91']


I've been having trouble iterating of the objects to figure this out, especially if there is an item within a list. What I've been trying thus far is something like the below, though it doesn't currently work I'm pasting it for reference:



def count_per_key(obj, _c=None):

if _c is None: unique_values_per_key = {}

if isinstance(obj, list):
return [count_per_key(l) for l in obj]

elif not isinstance(obj, dict):
pass

else:
for key, value in obj.items():
if not isinstance(value, dict):
continue
elif isinstance(value, dict):
if key not in unique_values_per_key: unique_values_per_key[key] = set()
unique_values_per_key[key].union(set(value.keys()))
return count_per_key(value)
elif isinstance(value, list):
return [count_per_key(o) for o in value]

return unique_values_per_key









share|improve this question





























    2















    I have the following json object:



    [{
    'firstname': 'Jimmie',
    'lastname': 'Barninger',
    'zip_code': 12345,
    'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'],
    'ids': {
    '44': 'OK',
    '51': 'OK'
    },
    'address': {
    'state': 'MI',
    'town': 'Dearborn'
    },
    'other': {
    'ids': {
    '1': 'OK',
    '103': 'OK'
    },
    }
    }, {
    'firstname': 'John',
    'lastname': 'Doe',
    'zip_code': 90027,
    'colors': None,
    'ids': {
    '91': 'OK',
    '103': 'OK'
    },
    'address': {
    'state': 'CA',
    'town': 'Los Angeles'
    },
    'other': {
    'ids': {
    '91': 'OK',
    '103': 'OK'
    },
    }
    }]


    I would like to be able to get the number of unique key values that each dict has. In the above, the number would be:



    address: 2 # ['state', 'town']
    ids: 4 # ['44', '51', '91', '103']
    other.ids 3 # ['1', '103', '91']


    I've been having trouble iterating of the objects to figure this out, especially if there is an item within a list. What I've been trying thus far is something like the below, though it doesn't currently work I'm pasting it for reference:



    def count_per_key(obj, _c=None):

    if _c is None: unique_values_per_key = {}

    if isinstance(obj, list):
    return [count_per_key(l) for l in obj]

    elif not isinstance(obj, dict):
    pass

    else:
    for key, value in obj.items():
    if not isinstance(value, dict):
    continue
    elif isinstance(value, dict):
    if key not in unique_values_per_key: unique_values_per_key[key] = set()
    unique_values_per_key[key].union(set(value.keys()))
    return count_per_key(value)
    elif isinstance(value, list):
    return [count_per_key(o) for o in value]

    return unique_values_per_key









    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2


      2






      I have the following json object:



      [{
      'firstname': 'Jimmie',
      'lastname': 'Barninger',
      'zip_code': 12345,
      'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'],
      'ids': {
      '44': 'OK',
      '51': 'OK'
      },
      'address': {
      'state': 'MI',
      'town': 'Dearborn'
      },
      'other': {
      'ids': {
      '1': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      }
      }, {
      'firstname': 'John',
      'lastname': 'Doe',
      'zip_code': 90027,
      'colors': None,
      'ids': {
      '91': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      'address': {
      'state': 'CA',
      'town': 'Los Angeles'
      },
      'other': {
      'ids': {
      '91': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      }
      }]


      I would like to be able to get the number of unique key values that each dict has. In the above, the number would be:



      address: 2 # ['state', 'town']
      ids: 4 # ['44', '51', '91', '103']
      other.ids 3 # ['1', '103', '91']


      I've been having trouble iterating of the objects to figure this out, especially if there is an item within a list. What I've been trying thus far is something like the below, though it doesn't currently work I'm pasting it for reference:



      def count_per_key(obj, _c=None):

      if _c is None: unique_values_per_key = {}

      if isinstance(obj, list):
      return [count_per_key(l) for l in obj]

      elif not isinstance(obj, dict):
      pass

      else:
      for key, value in obj.items():
      if not isinstance(value, dict):
      continue
      elif isinstance(value, dict):
      if key not in unique_values_per_key: unique_values_per_key[key] = set()
      unique_values_per_key[key].union(set(value.keys()))
      return count_per_key(value)
      elif isinstance(value, list):
      return [count_per_key(o) for o in value]

      return unique_values_per_key









      share|improve this question
















      I have the following json object:



      [{
      'firstname': 'Jimmie',
      'lastname': 'Barninger',
      'zip_code': 12345,
      'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'],
      'ids': {
      '44': 'OK',
      '51': 'OK'
      },
      'address': {
      'state': 'MI',
      'town': 'Dearborn'
      },
      'other': {
      'ids': {
      '1': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      }
      }, {
      'firstname': 'John',
      'lastname': 'Doe',
      'zip_code': 90027,
      'colors': None,
      'ids': {
      '91': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      'address': {
      'state': 'CA',
      'town': 'Los Angeles'
      },
      'other': {
      'ids': {
      '91': 'OK',
      '103': 'OK'
      },
      }
      }]


      I would like to be able to get the number of unique key values that each dict has. In the above, the number would be:



      address: 2 # ['state', 'town']
      ids: 4 # ['44', '51', '91', '103']
      other.ids 3 # ['1', '103', '91']


      I've been having trouble iterating of the objects to figure this out, especially if there is an item within a list. What I've been trying thus far is something like the below, though it doesn't currently work I'm pasting it for reference:



      def count_per_key(obj, _c=None):

      if _c is None: unique_values_per_key = {}

      if isinstance(obj, list):
      return [count_per_key(l) for l in obj]

      elif not isinstance(obj, dict):
      pass

      else:
      for key, value in obj.items():
      if not isinstance(value, dict):
      continue
      elif isinstance(value, dict):
      if key not in unique_values_per_key: unique_values_per_key[key] = set()
      unique_values_per_key[key].union(set(value.keys()))
      return count_per_key(value)
      elif isinstance(value, list):
      return [count_per_key(o) for o in value]

      return unique_values_per_key






      python recursion






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 23:59









      Ajax1234

      41.2k42853




      41.2k42853










      asked Dec 30 '18 at 23:40









      David LDavid L

      38516




      38516
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You can use recursion with a generator:



          from collections import defaultdict
          d = [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
          def get_vals(d, _path = ):
          for a, b in getattr(d, 'items', lambda :{})():
          if a in {'ids', 'address'}:
          yield ['.'.join(_path+[a]), list(b.keys())]
          else:
          yield from get_vals(b, _path+[a])

          c = defaultdict(list)
          results = [i for b in d for i in get_vals(b)]
          for a, b in results:
          c[a].extend(b)

          _r = [[a, set(list(b))] for a, b in c.items()]
          new_r = [[a, b, len(b)] for a, b in _r]


          Output:



          [
          ['ids', {'91', '44', '51', '103'}, 4],
          ['address', {'state', 'town'}, 2],
          ['other.ids', {'1', '91', '103'}, 3]
          ]





          share|improve this answer


























          • I just updated the question with some nesting.

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:53











          • @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:58











          • thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:59











          • @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:01













          • would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

            – David L
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:36



















          1














          l= [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
          def find_dicts(d,parent=''):
          for k,v in d.items():
          if isinstance(v,dict):
          if parent is not '':
          identifier=str(parent)+'.'+str(k)
          else:
          identifier=str(k)
          yield {identifier:[x for x in v.keys()]}
          yield from find_dicts(v,k)
          else:
          pass

          s=[list(find_dicts(d)) for d in l]
          dict_names=[list(y.keys())[0] for y in s[0]]
          final_dict={name: for name in dict_names}
          for li in s:
          for di in li:
          di_key=list(di.keys())[0]
          di_values=list(di.values())[0]
          for k,v in final_dict.items():
          if k == di_key:
          for value in di_values:
          if value not in final_dict[k]:
          final_dict[k].append(value)
          for k,v in final_dict.items():
          print(k,":",len(v),v)


          Output



          ids : 4 ['44', '51', '91', '103']
          address : 2 ['town', 'state']
          other.ids : 3 ['103', '1', '91']
          other : 1 ['ids']





          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53982334%2fget-the-number-of-dict-values-in-a-nested-dict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            You can use recursion with a generator:



            from collections import defaultdict
            d = [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
            def get_vals(d, _path = ):
            for a, b in getattr(d, 'items', lambda :{})():
            if a in {'ids', 'address'}:
            yield ['.'.join(_path+[a]), list(b.keys())]
            else:
            yield from get_vals(b, _path+[a])

            c = defaultdict(list)
            results = [i for b in d for i in get_vals(b)]
            for a, b in results:
            c[a].extend(b)

            _r = [[a, set(list(b))] for a, b in c.items()]
            new_r = [[a, b, len(b)] for a, b in _r]


            Output:



            [
            ['ids', {'91', '44', '51', '103'}, 4],
            ['address', {'state', 'town'}, 2],
            ['other.ids', {'1', '91', '103'}, 3]
            ]





            share|improve this answer


























            • I just updated the question with some nesting.

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:53











            • @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:58











            • thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:59











            • @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:01













            • would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

              – David L
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:36
















            1














            You can use recursion with a generator:



            from collections import defaultdict
            d = [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
            def get_vals(d, _path = ):
            for a, b in getattr(d, 'items', lambda :{})():
            if a in {'ids', 'address'}:
            yield ['.'.join(_path+[a]), list(b.keys())]
            else:
            yield from get_vals(b, _path+[a])

            c = defaultdict(list)
            results = [i for b in d for i in get_vals(b)]
            for a, b in results:
            c[a].extend(b)

            _r = [[a, set(list(b))] for a, b in c.items()]
            new_r = [[a, b, len(b)] for a, b in _r]


            Output:



            [
            ['ids', {'91', '44', '51', '103'}, 4],
            ['address', {'state', 'town'}, 2],
            ['other.ids', {'1', '91', '103'}, 3]
            ]





            share|improve this answer


























            • I just updated the question with some nesting.

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:53











            • @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:58











            • thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:59











            • @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:01













            • would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

              – David L
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:36














            1












            1








            1







            You can use recursion with a generator:



            from collections import defaultdict
            d = [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
            def get_vals(d, _path = ):
            for a, b in getattr(d, 'items', lambda :{})():
            if a in {'ids', 'address'}:
            yield ['.'.join(_path+[a]), list(b.keys())]
            else:
            yield from get_vals(b, _path+[a])

            c = defaultdict(list)
            results = [i for b in d for i in get_vals(b)]
            for a, b in results:
            c[a].extend(b)

            _r = [[a, set(list(b))] for a, b in c.items()]
            new_r = [[a, b, len(b)] for a, b in _r]


            Output:



            [
            ['ids', {'91', '44', '51', '103'}, 4],
            ['address', {'state', 'town'}, 2],
            ['other.ids', {'1', '91', '103'}, 3]
            ]





            share|improve this answer















            You can use recursion with a generator:



            from collections import defaultdict
            d = [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
            def get_vals(d, _path = ):
            for a, b in getattr(d, 'items', lambda :{})():
            if a in {'ids', 'address'}:
            yield ['.'.join(_path+[a]), list(b.keys())]
            else:
            yield from get_vals(b, _path+[a])

            c = defaultdict(list)
            results = [i for b in d for i in get_vals(b)]
            for a, b in results:
            c[a].extend(b)

            _r = [[a, set(list(b))] for a, b in c.items()]
            new_r = [[a, b, len(b)] for a, b in _r]


            Output:



            [
            ['ids', {'91', '44', '51', '103'}, 4],
            ['address', {'state', 'town'}, 2],
            ['other.ids', {'1', '91', '103'}, 3]
            ]






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 31 '18 at 0:09

























            answered Dec 30 '18 at 23:47









            Ajax1234Ajax1234

            41.2k42853




            41.2k42853













            • I just updated the question with some nesting.

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:53











            • @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:58











            • thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:59











            • @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:01













            • would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

              – David L
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:36



















            • I just updated the question with some nesting.

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:53











            • @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:58











            • thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

              – David L
              Dec 30 '18 at 23:59











            • @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

              – Ajax1234
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:01













            • would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

              – David L
              Dec 31 '18 at 0:36

















            I just updated the question with some nesting.

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:53





            I just updated the question with some nesting.

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:53













            @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:58





            @DavidL Please see my recent edit. Note that this solution only relies on the names of the most immediate values you are searching for, not the path to the values.

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:58













            thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:59





            thanks for the update, but for this I don't know the keys beforehand. Is there a way to apply the above without knowing the field names?

            – David L
            Dec 30 '18 at 23:59













            @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:01







            @DavidL Do you mean that the solution should be able to take a list of desired names, not have them hardcoded?

            – Ajax1234
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:01















            would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

            – David L
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:36





            would there be a way to do it without hardcoding the {'ids', 'address'} line in there?

            – David L
            Dec 31 '18 at 0:36













            1














            l= [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
            def find_dicts(d,parent=''):
            for k,v in d.items():
            if isinstance(v,dict):
            if parent is not '':
            identifier=str(parent)+'.'+str(k)
            else:
            identifier=str(k)
            yield {identifier:[x for x in v.keys()]}
            yield from find_dicts(v,k)
            else:
            pass

            s=[list(find_dicts(d)) for d in l]
            dict_names=[list(y.keys())[0] for y in s[0]]
            final_dict={name: for name in dict_names}
            for li in s:
            for di in li:
            di_key=list(di.keys())[0]
            di_values=list(di.values())[0]
            for k,v in final_dict.items():
            if k == di_key:
            for value in di_values:
            if value not in final_dict[k]:
            final_dict[k].append(value)
            for k,v in final_dict.items():
            print(k,":",len(v),v)


            Output



            ids : 4 ['44', '51', '91', '103']
            address : 2 ['town', 'state']
            other.ids : 3 ['103', '1', '91']
            other : 1 ['ids']





            share|improve this answer






























              1














              l= [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
              def find_dicts(d,parent=''):
              for k,v in d.items():
              if isinstance(v,dict):
              if parent is not '':
              identifier=str(parent)+'.'+str(k)
              else:
              identifier=str(k)
              yield {identifier:[x for x in v.keys()]}
              yield from find_dicts(v,k)
              else:
              pass

              s=[list(find_dicts(d)) for d in l]
              dict_names=[list(y.keys())[0] for y in s[0]]
              final_dict={name: for name in dict_names}
              for li in s:
              for di in li:
              di_key=list(di.keys())[0]
              di_values=list(di.values())[0]
              for k,v in final_dict.items():
              if k == di_key:
              for value in di_values:
              if value not in final_dict[k]:
              final_dict[k].append(value)
              for k,v in final_dict.items():
              print(k,":",len(v),v)


              Output



              ids : 4 ['44', '51', '91', '103']
              address : 2 ['town', 'state']
              other.ids : 3 ['103', '1', '91']
              other : 1 ['ids']





              share|improve this answer




























                1












                1








                1







                l= [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
                def find_dicts(d,parent=''):
                for k,v in d.items():
                if isinstance(v,dict):
                if parent is not '':
                identifier=str(parent)+'.'+str(k)
                else:
                identifier=str(k)
                yield {identifier:[x for x in v.keys()]}
                yield from find_dicts(v,k)
                else:
                pass

                s=[list(find_dicts(d)) for d in l]
                dict_names=[list(y.keys())[0] for y in s[0]]
                final_dict={name: for name in dict_names}
                for li in s:
                for di in li:
                di_key=list(di.keys())[0]
                di_values=list(di.values())[0]
                for k,v in final_dict.items():
                if k == di_key:
                for value in di_values:
                if value not in final_dict[k]:
                final_dict[k].append(value)
                for k,v in final_dict.items():
                print(k,":",len(v),v)


                Output



                ids : 4 ['44', '51', '91', '103']
                address : 2 ['town', 'state']
                other.ids : 3 ['103', '1', '91']
                other : 1 ['ids']





                share|improve this answer















                l= [{'firstname': 'Jimmie', 'lastname': 'Barninger', 'zip_code': 12345, 'colors': ['2014-01-01', '2015-01-01'], 'ids': {'44': 'OK', '51': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'MI', 'town': 'Dearborn'}, 'other': {'ids': {'1': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}, {'firstname': 'John', 'lastname': 'Doe', 'zip_code': 90027, 'colors': None, 'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}, 'address': {'state': 'CA', 'town': 'Los Angeles'}, 'other': {'ids': {'91': 'OK', '103': 'OK'}}}]
                def find_dicts(d,parent=''):
                for k,v in d.items():
                if isinstance(v,dict):
                if parent is not '':
                identifier=str(parent)+'.'+str(k)
                else:
                identifier=str(k)
                yield {identifier:[x for x in v.keys()]}
                yield from find_dicts(v,k)
                else:
                pass

                s=[list(find_dicts(d)) for d in l]
                dict_names=[list(y.keys())[0] for y in s[0]]
                final_dict={name: for name in dict_names}
                for li in s:
                for di in li:
                di_key=list(di.keys())[0]
                di_values=list(di.values())[0]
                for k,v in final_dict.items():
                if k == di_key:
                for value in di_values:
                if value not in final_dict[k]:
                final_dict[k].append(value)
                for k,v in final_dict.items():
                print(k,":",len(v),v)


                Output



                ids : 4 ['44', '51', '91', '103']
                address : 2 ['town', 'state']
                other.ids : 3 ['103', '1', '91']
                other : 1 ['ids']






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Dec 31 '18 at 3:06

























                answered Dec 31 '18 at 3:01









                Bitto BennichanBitto Bennichan

                2,2161220




                2,2161220






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53982334%2fget-the-number-of-dict-values-in-a-nested-dict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

                    Olmecas

                    Can't read property showImagePicker of undefined in react native iOS