Divide and conquer merge sorting not working





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







-1















Here is the code. I simply did a merge sorting using a Divide and Conquer algorithm but it doesn't work and i haven't found why. I'm passing an unordered vector, 0 and vector.size() to the mergeSort function.



#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end);

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right);

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right);

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end)
{
T value = T();
int i;
int j;

for(i = start + 1; i < end; ++i)
{
value = vec[i];
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0 && !(vec[j] < value); --j)
vec[j + 1] = vec[j];
vec[j + 1] = value;
}
}

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right)
{
int length = right - left;

if(length <= 3)
directInsertion(vec, left, right);
else
{
int middle = left + (length >> 1);
mergeSort(vec, left, middle);
mergeSort(vec, middle, right);
merge(vec, left, middle, right);
}
}

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right)
{
int length = right - left;
int p = left;
int q = middle + 1;

std::vector<T> tmp;

for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l) {
if (p <= middle && (q >= right || vec.at(p) <= vec.at(q)))
tmp.push_back(vec.at(p++));
else
tmp.push_back(vec.at(q++));
}
for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l)
vec.at(left + l) = tmp.at(l);
}

void printMessage(bool passed, const char* message)
{
if(passed)
std::cout << message << "............... PASS" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << message << "............... FAIL" << std::endl;
}

void printVector(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::cout << "[";
for(auto i: v)
std::cout << " " << i << " ,";
std::cout << "]";
}

int main()
{
std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::vector<int> orderedVector = v;
std::vector<int> aux;

bool passed = true;

do {
aux = v;
mergeSort(aux, 0, aux.size());
if(aux != orderedVector)
{
printVector(aux);
std::cout << " != ";
printVector(orderedVector);
std::cout << std::endl;
passed = false;
}
} while(std::next_permutation(v.begin(), v.end()) && passed);

printMessage(passed, "MERGE SORT");
}









share|improve this question




















  • 6





    This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

    – Max Langhof
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 3





    Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 5





    @Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:46








  • 3





    I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:19






  • 3





    also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:28


















-1















Here is the code. I simply did a merge sorting using a Divide and Conquer algorithm but it doesn't work and i haven't found why. I'm passing an unordered vector, 0 and vector.size() to the mergeSort function.



#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end);

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right);

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right);

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end)
{
T value = T();
int i;
int j;

for(i = start + 1; i < end; ++i)
{
value = vec[i];
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0 && !(vec[j] < value); --j)
vec[j + 1] = vec[j];
vec[j + 1] = value;
}
}

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right)
{
int length = right - left;

if(length <= 3)
directInsertion(vec, left, right);
else
{
int middle = left + (length >> 1);
mergeSort(vec, left, middle);
mergeSort(vec, middle, right);
merge(vec, left, middle, right);
}
}

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right)
{
int length = right - left;
int p = left;
int q = middle + 1;

std::vector<T> tmp;

for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l) {
if (p <= middle && (q >= right || vec.at(p) <= vec.at(q)))
tmp.push_back(vec.at(p++));
else
tmp.push_back(vec.at(q++));
}
for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l)
vec.at(left + l) = tmp.at(l);
}

void printMessage(bool passed, const char* message)
{
if(passed)
std::cout << message << "............... PASS" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << message << "............... FAIL" << std::endl;
}

void printVector(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::cout << "[";
for(auto i: v)
std::cout << " " << i << " ,";
std::cout << "]";
}

int main()
{
std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::vector<int> orderedVector = v;
std::vector<int> aux;

bool passed = true;

do {
aux = v;
mergeSort(aux, 0, aux.size());
if(aux != orderedVector)
{
printVector(aux);
std::cout << " != ";
printVector(orderedVector);
std::cout << std::endl;
passed = false;
}
} while(std::next_permutation(v.begin(), v.end()) && passed);

printMessage(passed, "MERGE SORT");
}









share|improve this question




















  • 6





    This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

    – Max Langhof
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 3





    Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 5





    @Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:46








  • 3





    I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:19






  • 3





    also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:28














-1












-1








-1








Here is the code. I simply did a merge sorting using a Divide and Conquer algorithm but it doesn't work and i haven't found why. I'm passing an unordered vector, 0 and vector.size() to the mergeSort function.



#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end);

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right);

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right);

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end)
{
T value = T();
int i;
int j;

for(i = start + 1; i < end; ++i)
{
value = vec[i];
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0 && !(vec[j] < value); --j)
vec[j + 1] = vec[j];
vec[j + 1] = value;
}
}

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right)
{
int length = right - left;

if(length <= 3)
directInsertion(vec, left, right);
else
{
int middle = left + (length >> 1);
mergeSort(vec, left, middle);
mergeSort(vec, middle, right);
merge(vec, left, middle, right);
}
}

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right)
{
int length = right - left;
int p = left;
int q = middle + 1;

std::vector<T> tmp;

for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l) {
if (p <= middle && (q >= right || vec.at(p) <= vec.at(q)))
tmp.push_back(vec.at(p++));
else
tmp.push_back(vec.at(q++));
}
for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l)
vec.at(left + l) = tmp.at(l);
}

void printMessage(bool passed, const char* message)
{
if(passed)
std::cout << message << "............... PASS" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << message << "............... FAIL" << std::endl;
}

void printVector(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::cout << "[";
for(auto i: v)
std::cout << " " << i << " ,";
std::cout << "]";
}

int main()
{
std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::vector<int> orderedVector = v;
std::vector<int> aux;

bool passed = true;

do {
aux = v;
mergeSort(aux, 0, aux.size());
if(aux != orderedVector)
{
printVector(aux);
std::cout << " != ";
printVector(orderedVector);
std::cout << std::endl;
passed = false;
}
} while(std::next_permutation(v.begin(), v.end()) && passed);

printMessage(passed, "MERGE SORT");
}









share|improve this question
















Here is the code. I simply did a merge sorting using a Divide and Conquer algorithm but it doesn't work and i haven't found why. I'm passing an unordered vector, 0 and vector.size() to the mergeSort function.



#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end);

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right);

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right);

template<typename T>
void directInsertion(std::vector<T>& vec, int start, int end)
{
T value = T();
int i;
int j;

for(i = start + 1; i < end; ++i)
{
value = vec[i];
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0 && !(vec[j] < value); --j)
vec[j + 1] = vec[j];
vec[j + 1] = value;
}
}

template<typename T>
void mergeSort(std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int right)
{
int length = right - left;

if(length <= 3)
directInsertion(vec, left, right);
else
{
int middle = left + (length >> 1);
mergeSort(vec, left, middle);
mergeSort(vec, middle, right);
merge(vec, left, middle, right);
}
}

template<typename T>
void merge (std::vector<T>& vec, int left, int middle, int right)
{
int length = right - left;
int p = left;
int q = middle + 1;

std::vector<T> tmp;

for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l) {
if (p <= middle && (q >= right || vec.at(p) <= vec.at(q)))
tmp.push_back(vec.at(p++));
else
tmp.push_back(vec.at(q++));
}
for(size_t l = 0; l < length; ++l)
vec.at(left + l) = tmp.at(l);
}

void printMessage(bool passed, const char* message)
{
if(passed)
std::cout << message << "............... PASS" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << message << "............... FAIL" << std::endl;
}

void printVector(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::cout << "[";
for(auto i: v)
std::cout << " " << i << " ,";
std::cout << "]";
}

int main()
{
std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::vector<int> orderedVector = v;
std::vector<int> aux;

bool passed = true;

do {
aux = v;
mergeSort(aux, 0, aux.size());
if(aux != orderedVector)
{
printVector(aux);
std::cout << " != ";
printVector(orderedVector);
std::cout << std::endl;
passed = false;
}
} while(std::next_permutation(v.begin(), v.end()) && passed);

printMessage(passed, "MERGE SORT");
}






c++ algorithm sorting debugging mergesort






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 21:10







Repikas

















asked Jan 4 at 13:25









RepikasRepikas

139110




139110








  • 6





    This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

    – Max Langhof
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 3





    Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 5





    @Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:46








  • 3





    I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:19






  • 3





    also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:28














  • 6





    This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

    – Max Langhof
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 3





    Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:31








  • 5





    @Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

    – PaulMcKenzie
    Jan 4 at 13:46








  • 3





    I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:19






  • 3





    also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

    – Kenny Ostrom
    Jan 4 at 14:28








6




6





This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

– Max Langhof
Jan 4 at 13:31







This is a problem that should be solved by debugging. Using your favorite debugger (and/or) IDE, step through the code line by line, each time formulating your expected result of a step before letting the code do it. If the line of code does something else than you expect, investigate there. Debugging like this is a crucial skill to have as a programmer, so use this opportunity!

– Max Langhof
Jan 4 at 13:31






3




3





Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

– PaulMcKenzie
Jan 4 at 13:31







Did you run your code using a debugger? Compare your code with the implementation here. What is the difference? Also, claiming that a function is working, thus you won't post the function many times ends up wasting a lot of time if the function that isn't posted is the faulty function.

– PaulMcKenzie
Jan 4 at 13:31






5




5





@Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

– PaulMcKenzie
Jan 4 at 13:46







@Repikas If i weren't 100% sure that directInsertion is working i would have post it -- If I had a dollar for every post where the unposted "working code" was the actual problem, I would be a rich man. Please post a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example.

– PaulMcKenzie
Jan 4 at 13:46






3




3





I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

– Kenny Ostrom
Jan 4 at 14:19





I fixed the missing includes, missing print functions, and reordered the functions so it would run. Your example should run without my having to do that. I got a vector index out of range. I'm not saying where because you should get the same when you debug it, and that will be a lot more useful to you.

– Kenny Ostrom
Jan 4 at 14:19




3




3





also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

– Kenny Ostrom
Jan 4 at 14:28





also avoid name conflicts. "vector" isn't a wise choice for a variable name. But nice test case -- I would recommend you make it as small as you can and still get the error, so it will be easy to debug.

– Kenny Ostrom
Jan 4 at 14:28












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














There may be other problems, but this line needs to be fixed:



        mergeSort(vec, middle + 1, right);


changed to



        mergeSort(vec, middle, right);


I would also suggest using the names begin and end instead of left and right, to be consistent with the naming convention used for vector iterators, and because the "right" iterator or index points to the "end" of a vector or array, 1 past the last element of the array.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54039825%2fdivide-and-conquer-merge-sorting-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    There may be other problems, but this line needs to be fixed:



            mergeSort(vec, middle + 1, right);


    changed to



            mergeSort(vec, middle, right);


    I would also suggest using the names begin and end instead of left and right, to be consistent with the naming convention used for vector iterators, and because the "right" iterator or index points to the "end" of a vector or array, 1 past the last element of the array.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      There may be other problems, but this line needs to be fixed:



              mergeSort(vec, middle + 1, right);


      changed to



              mergeSort(vec, middle, right);


      I would also suggest using the names begin and end instead of left and right, to be consistent with the naming convention used for vector iterators, and because the "right" iterator or index points to the "end" of a vector or array, 1 past the last element of the array.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        There may be other problems, but this line needs to be fixed:



                mergeSort(vec, middle + 1, right);


        changed to



                mergeSort(vec, middle, right);


        I would also suggest using the names begin and end instead of left and right, to be consistent with the naming convention used for vector iterators, and because the "right" iterator or index points to the "end" of a vector or array, 1 past the last element of the array.






        share|improve this answer















        There may be other problems, but this line needs to be fixed:



                mergeSort(vec, middle + 1, right);


        changed to



                mergeSort(vec, middle, right);


        I would also suggest using the names begin and end instead of left and right, to be consistent with the naming convention used for vector iterators, and because the "right" iterator or index points to the "end" of a vector or array, 1 past the last element of the array.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jan 4 at 19:18

























        answered Jan 4 at 16:55









        rcgldrrcgldr

        16.2k31437




        16.2k31437
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54039825%2fdivide-and-conquer-merge-sorting-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Monofisismo

            Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

            Olmecas