Spring Security OAuth2: how to add multiple Security Filter Chain of type ResourceServerConfigurer?












0















I set up a Spring Boot multi modules (5 modules) app with Spring Security OAuth2. Everything works well but as the application is growing I want to separate the security part in each module. The main module enables everything:



@SpringBootApplication
@EnableResourceServer
@EnableAuthorizationServer
@EnableWebSecurity(debug = true)
public class Application {
...
}


Now in each module I defined a bean of type ResourceServerConfigurer



@Configuration
@Order(2)
public class Module1SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

@Override
public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
http.antMatcher( "/module1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers( "/module1/resource").authenticated()
.antMatchers( "/module1/test" ).authenticated()
.anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
}
}


Same thing with module2:



@Configuration
@Order(1)
public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

@Override
public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
http.antMatcher( "/module2/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers( "/module2/resource").authenticated()
.antMatchers( "/module2/test" ).authenticated()
.anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
}
}


And so on...



The problem is that only one FilterChain is registered, the one whith @Order(2). I took a look at the doc of ResourceServerConfigurer and it states this:




... if more than one configures the same preoperty, then the last one wins. The configurers are sorted by Order before being applied




How can I proceed to bypass this limitation?
Thanks a lot.



EDIT



Doing this (extending WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter instead of ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter):



@Configuration
@Order(1)
public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {...}


seems to register the filter chain but there is another problem, when I authenticate a user (getting token on /oauth/token) I can't acces a resource protected by this chain, I got a 403 Forbidden. How does this black box work?










share|improve this question





























    0















    I set up a Spring Boot multi modules (5 modules) app with Spring Security OAuth2. Everything works well but as the application is growing I want to separate the security part in each module. The main module enables everything:



    @SpringBootApplication
    @EnableResourceServer
    @EnableAuthorizationServer
    @EnableWebSecurity(debug = true)
    public class Application {
    ...
    }


    Now in each module I defined a bean of type ResourceServerConfigurer



    @Configuration
    @Order(2)
    public class Module1SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

    @Override
    public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
    http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
    http.antMatcher( "/module1/**")
    .authorizeRequests()
    .antMatchers( "/module1/resource").authenticated()
    .antMatchers( "/module1/test" ).authenticated()
    .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
    }
    }


    Same thing with module2:



    @Configuration
    @Order(1)
    public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

    @Override
    public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
    http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
    http.antMatcher( "/module2/**")
    .authorizeRequests()
    .antMatchers( "/module2/resource").authenticated()
    .antMatchers( "/module2/test" ).authenticated()
    .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
    }
    }


    And so on...



    The problem is that only one FilterChain is registered, the one whith @Order(2). I took a look at the doc of ResourceServerConfigurer and it states this:




    ... if more than one configures the same preoperty, then the last one wins. The configurers are sorted by Order before being applied




    How can I proceed to bypass this limitation?
    Thanks a lot.



    EDIT



    Doing this (extending WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter instead of ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter):



    @Configuration
    @Order(1)
    public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {...}


    seems to register the filter chain but there is another problem, when I authenticate a user (getting token on /oauth/token) I can't acces a resource protected by this chain, I got a 403 Forbidden. How does this black box work?










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I set up a Spring Boot multi modules (5 modules) app with Spring Security OAuth2. Everything works well but as the application is growing I want to separate the security part in each module. The main module enables everything:



      @SpringBootApplication
      @EnableResourceServer
      @EnableAuthorizationServer
      @EnableWebSecurity(debug = true)
      public class Application {
      ...
      }


      Now in each module I defined a bean of type ResourceServerConfigurer



      @Configuration
      @Order(2)
      public class Module1SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

      @Override
      public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
      http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
      http.antMatcher( "/module1/**")
      .authorizeRequests()
      .antMatchers( "/module1/resource").authenticated()
      .antMatchers( "/module1/test" ).authenticated()
      .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
      }
      }


      Same thing with module2:



      @Configuration
      @Order(1)
      public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

      @Override
      public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
      http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
      http.antMatcher( "/module2/**")
      .authorizeRequests()
      .antMatchers( "/module2/resource").authenticated()
      .antMatchers( "/module2/test" ).authenticated()
      .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
      }
      }


      And so on...



      The problem is that only one FilterChain is registered, the one whith @Order(2). I took a look at the doc of ResourceServerConfigurer and it states this:




      ... if more than one configures the same preoperty, then the last one wins. The configurers are sorted by Order before being applied




      How can I proceed to bypass this limitation?
      Thanks a lot.



      EDIT



      Doing this (extending WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter instead of ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter):



      @Configuration
      @Order(1)
      public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {...}


      seems to register the filter chain but there is another problem, when I authenticate a user (getting token on /oauth/token) I can't acces a resource protected by this chain, I got a 403 Forbidden. How does this black box work?










      share|improve this question
















      I set up a Spring Boot multi modules (5 modules) app with Spring Security OAuth2. Everything works well but as the application is growing I want to separate the security part in each module. The main module enables everything:



      @SpringBootApplication
      @EnableResourceServer
      @EnableAuthorizationServer
      @EnableWebSecurity(debug = true)
      public class Application {
      ...
      }


      Now in each module I defined a bean of type ResourceServerConfigurer



      @Configuration
      @Order(2)
      public class Module1SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

      @Override
      public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
      http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
      http.antMatcher( "/module1/**")
      .authorizeRequests()
      .antMatchers( "/module1/resource").authenticated()
      .antMatchers( "/module1/test" ).authenticated()
      .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
      }
      }


      Same thing with module2:



      @Configuration
      @Order(1)
      public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

      @Override
      public void configure( HttpSecurity http ) throws Exception {
      http.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy( STATELESS );
      http.antMatcher( "/module2/**")
      .authorizeRequests()
      .antMatchers( "/module2/resource").authenticated()
      .antMatchers( "/module2/test" ).authenticated()
      .anyRequest().access( "#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')" );
      }
      }


      And so on...



      The problem is that only one FilterChain is registered, the one whith @Order(2). I took a look at the doc of ResourceServerConfigurer and it states this:




      ... if more than one configures the same preoperty, then the last one wins. The configurers are sorted by Order before being applied




      How can I proceed to bypass this limitation?
      Thanks a lot.



      EDIT



      Doing this (extending WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter instead of ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter):



      @Configuration
      @Order(1)
      public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {...}


      seems to register the filter chain but there is another problem, when I authenticate a user (getting token on /oauth/token) I can't acces a resource protected by this chain, I got a 403 Forbidden. How does this black box work?







      spring-boot spring-security spring-security-oauth2






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 2 at 12:58







      akuma8

















      asked Jan 1 at 22:58









      akuma8akuma8

      902823




      902823
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You can configure multiple matchers using across multiple beans by using requestMatchers().antMatchers(String...) like so:



          @Configuration
          public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

          @Override
          public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
          http
          .requestMatchers()
          .antMatchers("/module2/**")
          .authorizeRequests()
          .antMatchers("/module2/resource").authenticated()
          .antMatchers("/module2/test").authenticated()
          .anyRequest().access("#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')");
          }
          }


          It's a little confusing, but when you call http.antMatcher(String), this is stating that you want to match only against that one endpoint. So, calling it twice (once in Module1SecurityFilterChain and then again in Module2SecurityFilterChain), the second call overrides the first.



          However, using http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String) indicates that the given String should be added to the existing list of endpoints being already matched. You can think of antMatcher as a bit like "setMatcher" and antMatchers like "appendMatcher".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:08











          • I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:41











          • Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:48











          • I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

            – akuma8
            Jan 3 at 22:52











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53999591%2fspring-security-oauth2-how-to-add-multiple-security-filter-chain-of-type-resour%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          You can configure multiple matchers using across multiple beans by using requestMatchers().antMatchers(String...) like so:



          @Configuration
          public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

          @Override
          public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
          http
          .requestMatchers()
          .antMatchers("/module2/**")
          .authorizeRequests()
          .antMatchers("/module2/resource").authenticated()
          .antMatchers("/module2/test").authenticated()
          .anyRequest().access("#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')");
          }
          }


          It's a little confusing, but when you call http.antMatcher(String), this is stating that you want to match only against that one endpoint. So, calling it twice (once in Module1SecurityFilterChain and then again in Module2SecurityFilterChain), the second call overrides the first.



          However, using http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String) indicates that the given String should be added to the existing list of endpoints being already matched. You can think of antMatcher as a bit like "setMatcher" and antMatchers like "appendMatcher".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:08











          • I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:41











          • Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:48











          • I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

            – akuma8
            Jan 3 at 22:52
















          1














          You can configure multiple matchers using across multiple beans by using requestMatchers().antMatchers(String...) like so:



          @Configuration
          public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

          @Override
          public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
          http
          .requestMatchers()
          .antMatchers("/module2/**")
          .authorizeRequests()
          .antMatchers("/module2/resource").authenticated()
          .antMatchers("/module2/test").authenticated()
          .anyRequest().access("#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')");
          }
          }


          It's a little confusing, but when you call http.antMatcher(String), this is stating that you want to match only against that one endpoint. So, calling it twice (once in Module1SecurityFilterChain and then again in Module2SecurityFilterChain), the second call overrides the first.



          However, using http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String) indicates that the given String should be added to the existing list of endpoints being already matched. You can think of antMatcher as a bit like "setMatcher" and antMatchers like "appendMatcher".






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:08











          • I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:41











          • Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:48











          • I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

            – akuma8
            Jan 3 at 22:52














          1












          1








          1







          You can configure multiple matchers using across multiple beans by using requestMatchers().antMatchers(String...) like so:



          @Configuration
          public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

          @Override
          public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
          http
          .requestMatchers()
          .antMatchers("/module2/**")
          .authorizeRequests()
          .antMatchers("/module2/resource").authenticated()
          .antMatchers("/module2/test").authenticated()
          .anyRequest().access("#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')");
          }
          }


          It's a little confusing, but when you call http.antMatcher(String), this is stating that you want to match only against that one endpoint. So, calling it twice (once in Module1SecurityFilterChain and then again in Module2SecurityFilterChain), the second call overrides the first.



          However, using http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String) indicates that the given String should be added to the existing list of endpoints being already matched. You can think of antMatcher as a bit like "setMatcher" and antMatchers like "appendMatcher".






          share|improve this answer













          You can configure multiple matchers using across multiple beans by using requestMatchers().antMatchers(String...) like so:



          @Configuration
          public class Module2SecurityFilterChain extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {

          @Override
          public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
          http
          .requestMatchers()
          .antMatchers("/module2/**")
          .authorizeRequests()
          .antMatchers("/module2/resource").authenticated()
          .antMatchers("/module2/test").authenticated()
          .anyRequest().access("#oauth2.hasScope('webclient')");
          }
          }


          It's a little confusing, but when you call http.antMatcher(String), this is stating that you want to match only against that one endpoint. So, calling it twice (once in Module1SecurityFilterChain and then again in Module2SecurityFilterChain), the second call overrides the first.



          However, using http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String) indicates that the given String should be added to the existing list of endpoints being already matched. You can think of antMatcher as a bit like "setMatcher" and antMatchers like "appendMatcher".







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 2 at 20:29









          jzheauxjzheaux

          2,6192921




          2,6192921













          • Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:08











          • I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:41











          • Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:48











          • I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

            – akuma8
            Jan 3 at 22:52



















          • Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:08











          • I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:41











          • Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

            – akuma8
            Jan 2 at 21:48











          • I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

            – akuma8
            Jan 3 at 22:52

















          Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:08





          Thanks for replying, I want to try your suggestion but there isn't the method authorizeRequests() after http.requestMatchers().antMatchers(String)

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:08













          I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:41





          I accept the response (after editing it to add the and() method ^^) even if it's not exactly what I wanted but the goal seems to be the same. In fact I wanted to define multiple FilterChain but with you answer, there is only one mapped to all module's request. Like each module's security configuration is separated it's also a good option. Spring Security isn't easy to undestand at all, a real black box. Thanks again for your answer

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:41













          Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:48





          Another question, why with WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter we do not have this behavior? I mean, why its http.antMatcher(String) creates another FilterChain and doesn't override the others?

          – akuma8
          Jan 2 at 21:48













          I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

          – akuma8
          Jan 3 at 22:52





          I have another issue related to this solution, please see here: stackoverflow.com/q/54030887/6643803

          – akuma8
          Jan 3 at 22:52




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53999591%2fspring-security-oauth2-how-to-add-multiple-security-filter-chain-of-type-resour%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Monofisismo

          Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

          Olmecas