How to do code-review and submit with git command like 'git commit'?
I would like to do code-review and submit with git command line, since git support commit by cmmand line, so which command of git can do the the code-review and submit?
git command-line submit
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
add a comment |
I would like to do code-review and submit with git command line, since git support commit by cmmand line, so which command of git can do the the code-review and submit?
git command-line submit
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32
add a comment |
I would like to do code-review and submit with git command line, since git support commit by cmmand line, so which command of git can do the the code-review and submit?
git command-line submit
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
I would like to do code-review and submit with git command line, since git support commit by cmmand line, so which command of git can do the the code-review and submit?
git command-line submit
git command-line submit
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
asked Jan 3 at 7:52
HuangHuang
61
61
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32
add a comment |
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As you can see in comments above, code reviews are not built-in to git. But git allows you to be very creative when it comes to your workflow.
Here you find two very popular workflows (Git Flow and GitHub Flow) discussed in detail: https://youtu.be/ww4xpcvzLHc. Both of which make use of code reviews before code changes are merged or pulled into the "productive" envoronment (i.e. the master branch or origin repo).
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54018305%2fhow-to-do-code-review-and-submit-with-git-command-like-git-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As you can see in comments above, code reviews are not built-in to git. But git allows you to be very creative when it comes to your workflow.
Here you find two very popular workflows (Git Flow and GitHub Flow) discussed in detail: https://youtu.be/ww4xpcvzLHc. Both of which make use of code reviews before code changes are merged or pulled into the "productive" envoronment (i.e. the master branch or origin repo).
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
add a comment |
As you can see in comments above, code reviews are not built-in to git. But git allows you to be very creative when it comes to your workflow.
Here you find two very popular workflows (Git Flow and GitHub Flow) discussed in detail: https://youtu.be/ww4xpcvzLHc. Both of which make use of code reviews before code changes are merged or pulled into the "productive" envoronment (i.e. the master branch or origin repo).
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
add a comment |
As you can see in comments above, code reviews are not built-in to git. But git allows you to be very creative when it comes to your workflow.
Here you find two very popular workflows (Git Flow and GitHub Flow) discussed in detail: https://youtu.be/ww4xpcvzLHc. Both of which make use of code reviews before code changes are merged or pulled into the "productive" envoronment (i.e. the master branch or origin repo).
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
As you can see in comments above, code reviews are not built-in to git. But git allows you to be very creative when it comes to your workflow.
Here you find two very popular workflows (Git Flow and GitHub Flow) discussed in detail: https://youtu.be/ww4xpcvzLHc. Both of which make use of code reviews before code changes are merged or pulled into the "productive" envoronment (i.e. the master branch or origin repo).
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
answered Jan 3 at 11:19
salchintsalchint
1645
1645
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54018305%2fhow-to-do-code-review-and-submit-with-git-command-like-git-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Code-reviews are not a git feature. All you can do is commit to a certain remote branch and let a git repository management framework, like GitHub or GitLab, handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests.
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 8:02
@kowsky Could you explain regarding 'handle your code reviews via mechanisms like pull or merge requests' ?
– Huang
Jan 3 at 8:48
If you use GitLab as repository management framework, you can issue merge requests to merge one branch into another in GitLab. If you use GitHub as repository management framework, you can issue pull requests to merge one branch into another in GitHub. Both are framework specific ways to perform code reviews. Git itself does not offer such mechanisms. If you want a convenient way to review code, you will need to use a platform. There are plenty: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket...
– kowsky
Jan 3 at 9:17
@kowsky get it, thanks for your detail explain.
– Huang
Jan 3 at 11:32