Aggregate query for count for pivot table without using join
I have following MySQL query that I am using in laravel for getting pivot table counts.
select tracks.*, track_play_counts.track_id, count(track_play_counts.id) as track_play
from tracks
join track_play_counts on tracks.id = track_play_counts.track_id
group by track_id
order by track_play ;
it is taking too much time about 20 sec for larger amount of data. How can i reduce it?
I have already tried withCount() but it is used as filter query also so I can not use withCount here.
Is the way from that I can select particular field like track_play without using join? I realize that because of joining it is taking too much response time.
php mysql laravel laravel-5.6
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
|
show 1 more comment
I have following MySQL query that I am using in laravel for getting pivot table counts.
select tracks.*, track_play_counts.track_id, count(track_play_counts.id) as track_play
from tracks
join track_play_counts on tracks.id = track_play_counts.track_id
group by track_id
order by track_play ;
it is taking too much time about 20 sec for larger amount of data. How can i reduce it?
I have already tried withCount() but it is used as filter query also so I can not use withCount here.
Is the way from that I can select particular field like track_play without using join? I realize that because of joining it is taking too much response time.
php mysql laravel laravel-5.6
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45
|
show 1 more comment
I have following MySQL query that I am using in laravel for getting pivot table counts.
select tracks.*, track_play_counts.track_id, count(track_play_counts.id) as track_play
from tracks
join track_play_counts on tracks.id = track_play_counts.track_id
group by track_id
order by track_play ;
it is taking too much time about 20 sec for larger amount of data. How can i reduce it?
I have already tried withCount() but it is used as filter query also so I can not use withCount here.
Is the way from that I can select particular field like track_play without using join? I realize that because of joining it is taking too much response time.
php mysql laravel laravel-5.6
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
I have following MySQL query that I am using in laravel for getting pivot table counts.
select tracks.*, track_play_counts.track_id, count(track_play_counts.id) as track_play
from tracks
join track_play_counts on tracks.id = track_play_counts.track_id
group by track_id
order by track_play ;
it is taking too much time about 20 sec for larger amount of data. How can i reduce it?
I have already tried withCount() but it is used as filter query also so I can not use withCount here.
Is the way from that I can select particular field like track_play without using join? I realize that because of joining it is taking too much response time.
php mysql laravel laravel-5.6
php mysql laravel laravel-5.6
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
edited Dec 31 '18 at 11:43
James Z
11.2k71935
11.2k71935
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
asked Dec 31 '18 at 6:37
unknownunknown
207
207
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45
|
show 1 more comment
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53984370%2faggregate-query-for-count-for-pivot-table-without-using-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53984370%2faggregate-query-for-count-for-pivot-table-without-using-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you indexed the foreign key??
– Shibon
Dec 31 '18 at 6:46
yes, i already indexed foreign key. what can be the other reason for it?
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 6:56
See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…. In addition, questions about query performance always require the EXPLAIN for the given query.
– Strawberry
Dec 31 '18 at 9:05
Sample schema for what i want sqlfiddle.com/#!9/bac61a/5
– unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 9:45
Usually indexing is the solution. Everything of course depends on what is "larger amount of data" exactly.
– James Z
Dec 31 '18 at 11:45