Variable Importance for caret loclda method
I am trying to compute the variable importance out of a caret 'loclda' model.
My training dataset contains 20 numeric predictors and 4 discrete outcome classes (2500 samples).
I built the model and computed the variable importance with the following commands:
# fit the model
control <- trainControl(
method="repeatedcv",
number=10,
repeats=3,
savePredictions='final',
summaryFunction=multiClassSummary,
returnData=F,
trim=T,
allowParallel=F
)
my_loclda_model <- train(MyClass ~ ., data=trainData, method='loclda', trControl=control, importance=T)
# compute variable importance
varImp(my_loclda_model)
Error : is.list(x) is not TRUE
traceback()
7: stop(msg, call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
6: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
5: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
4: asNumeric(x)
3: filterVarImp(x_dat, y_dat, nonpara = nonpara, ...)
2: varImp.train(model_name)
1: varImp(model_name)
From caret user manual we can read the following:
For models that do not have corresponding varImp methods, see filterVarImp
Assuming loclda model does not have a varImp method, I tried to use the filterVarImp function directly from the final model:
str(my_loclda_model$finalModel)
List of 12
$ learn : num [1:2500, 1:20] -0.404 -0.336 -0.655 -0.618 -0.151 ...
..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. ..$ : chr [1:2500] "X2" "X3" "X5" "X6" ...
.. ..$ : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ grouping : Factor w/ 4 levels "group1","group2","group3",..: 1 5 2 5 1 1 3 4 3 1 ...
..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:2500] "2" "3" "5" "6" ...
$ lev : chr [1:4] "group1" "group2" "group3" ...
$ weight.func :function (x)
$ k : num 3401
$ weighted.apriori: logi TRUE
$ call : language loclda(x = x, grouping = y, k = floor(param$k), importance = ..1)
$ xNames : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ problemType : chr "Classification"
$ tuneValue :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 1 variable:
..$ k: num 3401
$ obsLevels : atomic [1:4] group1 group2 group3 ...
..- attr(*, "ordered")= logi FALSE
$ param :List of 1
..$ importance: logi TRUE
- attr(*, "class")= chr "loclda"
imp_out <- filterVarImp(x=my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn, y=my_loclda_model$finalModel$grouping)
Error in data[, fc] : (subscript) logical subscript too long
traceback()
5: lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric)
4: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
3: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
2: asNumeric(x)
1: filterVarImp(x = model_name$finalModel$learn, y = model_name$finalModel$grouping)
I don't understand. What x and y arguments should I pass to filterVarImp?
Thanks !
Note: the same problem also happened when using other methods (e.g. svmRadial, svmPoly, LogitBoost, regLogistic, ...).
r r-caret
add a comment |
I am trying to compute the variable importance out of a caret 'loclda' model.
My training dataset contains 20 numeric predictors and 4 discrete outcome classes (2500 samples).
I built the model and computed the variable importance with the following commands:
# fit the model
control <- trainControl(
method="repeatedcv",
number=10,
repeats=3,
savePredictions='final',
summaryFunction=multiClassSummary,
returnData=F,
trim=T,
allowParallel=F
)
my_loclda_model <- train(MyClass ~ ., data=trainData, method='loclda', trControl=control, importance=T)
# compute variable importance
varImp(my_loclda_model)
Error : is.list(x) is not TRUE
traceback()
7: stop(msg, call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
6: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
5: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
4: asNumeric(x)
3: filterVarImp(x_dat, y_dat, nonpara = nonpara, ...)
2: varImp.train(model_name)
1: varImp(model_name)
From caret user manual we can read the following:
For models that do not have corresponding varImp methods, see filterVarImp
Assuming loclda model does not have a varImp method, I tried to use the filterVarImp function directly from the final model:
str(my_loclda_model$finalModel)
List of 12
$ learn : num [1:2500, 1:20] -0.404 -0.336 -0.655 -0.618 -0.151 ...
..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. ..$ : chr [1:2500] "X2" "X3" "X5" "X6" ...
.. ..$ : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ grouping : Factor w/ 4 levels "group1","group2","group3",..: 1 5 2 5 1 1 3 4 3 1 ...
..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:2500] "2" "3" "5" "6" ...
$ lev : chr [1:4] "group1" "group2" "group3" ...
$ weight.func :function (x)
$ k : num 3401
$ weighted.apriori: logi TRUE
$ call : language loclda(x = x, grouping = y, k = floor(param$k), importance = ..1)
$ xNames : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ problemType : chr "Classification"
$ tuneValue :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 1 variable:
..$ k: num 3401
$ obsLevels : atomic [1:4] group1 group2 group3 ...
..- attr(*, "ordered")= logi FALSE
$ param :List of 1
..$ importance: logi TRUE
- attr(*, "class")= chr "loclda"
imp_out <- filterVarImp(x=my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn, y=my_loclda_model$finalModel$grouping)
Error in data[, fc] : (subscript) logical subscript too long
traceback()
5: lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric)
4: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
3: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
2: asNumeric(x)
1: filterVarImp(x = model_name$finalModel$learn, y = model_name$finalModel$grouping)
I don't understand. What x and y arguments should I pass to filterVarImp?
Thanks !
Note: the same problem also happened when using other methods (e.g. svmRadial, svmPoly, LogitBoost, regLogistic, ...).
r r-caret
add a comment |
I am trying to compute the variable importance out of a caret 'loclda' model.
My training dataset contains 20 numeric predictors and 4 discrete outcome classes (2500 samples).
I built the model and computed the variable importance with the following commands:
# fit the model
control <- trainControl(
method="repeatedcv",
number=10,
repeats=3,
savePredictions='final',
summaryFunction=multiClassSummary,
returnData=F,
trim=T,
allowParallel=F
)
my_loclda_model <- train(MyClass ~ ., data=trainData, method='loclda', trControl=control, importance=T)
# compute variable importance
varImp(my_loclda_model)
Error : is.list(x) is not TRUE
traceback()
7: stop(msg, call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
6: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
5: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
4: asNumeric(x)
3: filterVarImp(x_dat, y_dat, nonpara = nonpara, ...)
2: varImp.train(model_name)
1: varImp(model_name)
From caret user manual we can read the following:
For models that do not have corresponding varImp methods, see filterVarImp
Assuming loclda model does not have a varImp method, I tried to use the filterVarImp function directly from the final model:
str(my_loclda_model$finalModel)
List of 12
$ learn : num [1:2500, 1:20] -0.404 -0.336 -0.655 -0.618 -0.151 ...
..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. ..$ : chr [1:2500] "X2" "X3" "X5" "X6" ...
.. ..$ : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ grouping : Factor w/ 4 levels "group1","group2","group3",..: 1 5 2 5 1 1 3 4 3 1 ...
..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:2500] "2" "3" "5" "6" ...
$ lev : chr [1:4] "group1" "group2" "group3" ...
$ weight.func :function (x)
$ k : num 3401
$ weighted.apriori: logi TRUE
$ call : language loclda(x = x, grouping = y, k = floor(param$k), importance = ..1)
$ xNames : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ problemType : chr "Classification"
$ tuneValue :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 1 variable:
..$ k: num 3401
$ obsLevels : atomic [1:4] group1 group2 group3 ...
..- attr(*, "ordered")= logi FALSE
$ param :List of 1
..$ importance: logi TRUE
- attr(*, "class")= chr "loclda"
imp_out <- filterVarImp(x=my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn, y=my_loclda_model$finalModel$grouping)
Error in data[, fc] : (subscript) logical subscript too long
traceback()
5: lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric)
4: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
3: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
2: asNumeric(x)
1: filterVarImp(x = model_name$finalModel$learn, y = model_name$finalModel$grouping)
I don't understand. What x and y arguments should I pass to filterVarImp?
Thanks !
Note: the same problem also happened when using other methods (e.g. svmRadial, svmPoly, LogitBoost, regLogistic, ...).
r r-caret
I am trying to compute the variable importance out of a caret 'loclda' model.
My training dataset contains 20 numeric predictors and 4 discrete outcome classes (2500 samples).
I built the model and computed the variable importance with the following commands:
# fit the model
control <- trainControl(
method="repeatedcv",
number=10,
repeats=3,
savePredictions='final',
summaryFunction=multiClassSummary,
returnData=F,
trim=T,
allowParallel=F
)
my_loclda_model <- train(MyClass ~ ., data=trainData, method='loclda', trControl=control, importance=T)
# compute variable importance
varImp(my_loclda_model)
Error : is.list(x) is not TRUE
traceback()
7: stop(msg, call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
6: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
5: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
4: asNumeric(x)
3: filterVarImp(x_dat, y_dat, nonpara = nonpara, ...)
2: varImp.train(model_name)
1: varImp(model_name)
From caret user manual we can read the following:
For models that do not have corresponding varImp methods, see filterVarImp
Assuming loclda model does not have a varImp method, I tried to use the filterVarImp function directly from the final model:
str(my_loclda_model$finalModel)
List of 12
$ learn : num [1:2500, 1:20] -0.404 -0.336 -0.655 -0.618 -0.151 ...
..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. ..$ : chr [1:2500] "X2" "X3" "X5" "X6" ...
.. ..$ : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ grouping : Factor w/ 4 levels "group1","group2","group3",..: 1 5 2 5 1 1 3 4 3 1 ...
..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:2500] "2" "3" "5" "6" ...
$ lev : chr [1:4] "group1" "group2" "group3" ...
$ weight.func :function (x)
$ k : num 3401
$ weighted.apriori: logi TRUE
$ call : language loclda(x = x, grouping = y, k = floor(param$k), importance = ..1)
$ xNames : chr [1:20] "indexA1" "indexF1" "index4" "index5" ...
$ problemType : chr "Classification"
$ tuneValue :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 1 variable:
..$ k: num 3401
$ obsLevels : atomic [1:4] group1 group2 group3 ...
..- attr(*, "ordered")= logi FALSE
$ param :List of 1
..$ importance: logi TRUE
- attr(*, "class")= chr "loclda"
imp_out <- filterVarImp(x=my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn, y=my_loclda_model$finalModel$grouping)
Error in data[, fc] : (subscript) logical subscript too long
traceback()
5: lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric)
4: stopifnot(is.list(x), is.list(val))
3: modifyList(data, lapply(data[, fc], as.numeric))
2: asNumeric(x)
1: filterVarImp(x = model_name$finalModel$learn, y = model_name$finalModel$grouping)
I don't understand. What x and y arguments should I pass to filterVarImp?
Thanks !
Note: the same problem also happened when using other methods (e.g. svmRadial, svmPoly, LogitBoost, regLogistic, ...).
r r-caret
r r-caret
edited Dec 30 '18 at 11:45
phiver
13.2k92734
13.2k92734
asked Dec 30 '18 at 11:39
user31888user31888
1007
1007
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Specifying x=as.data.frame(my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn) instead of a matrix seems to solve the problem, although the manual mentions that both matrix and data frame can be used.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53977285%2fvariable-importance-for-caret-loclda-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Specifying x=as.data.frame(my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn) instead of a matrix seems to solve the problem, although the manual mentions that both matrix and data frame can be used.
add a comment |
Specifying x=as.data.frame(my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn) instead of a matrix seems to solve the problem, although the manual mentions that both matrix and data frame can be used.
add a comment |
Specifying x=as.data.frame(my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn) instead of a matrix seems to solve the problem, although the manual mentions that both matrix and data frame can be used.
Specifying x=as.data.frame(my_loclda_model$finalModel$learn) instead of a matrix seems to solve the problem, although the manual mentions that both matrix and data frame can be used.
answered Dec 30 '18 at 12:21
user31888user31888
1007
1007
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53977285%2fvariable-importance-for-caret-loclda-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown