Packaging multiple Apache Beam pipelines in one jar file
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I'm working on a project with many Beam pipelines written in Java that needs to be packaged as a jar file for execution from our job scheduler. I've attempted to use build profiles for creating a jar for each main but this seems messy and I've had issues with dependency conflicts (with beam-sdks-java-io-amazon-web-services when its not used its still looking for required region options). I'm also just looking for overall sustainable project structure advice for a growing Beam code base.
What are the best practices for packaging pipelines to be executed on a schedule? Should I package multiple pipelines together so that I can execute each pipeline using the pipeline name and pipeline options parameters, if so, how? (potentially using some sort of master runner main that executes pipelines based on input parameters) Or should each pipeline be its own Maven project (this requires many jars)? Thoughts?
java maven executable-jar apache-beam
add a comment |
I'm working on a project with many Beam pipelines written in Java that needs to be packaged as a jar file for execution from our job scheduler. I've attempted to use build profiles for creating a jar for each main but this seems messy and I've had issues with dependency conflicts (with beam-sdks-java-io-amazon-web-services when its not used its still looking for required region options). I'm also just looking for overall sustainable project structure advice for a growing Beam code base.
What are the best practices for packaging pipelines to be executed on a schedule? Should I package multiple pipelines together so that I can execute each pipeline using the pipeline name and pipeline options parameters, if so, how? (potentially using some sort of master runner main that executes pipelines based on input parameters) Or should each pipeline be its own Maven project (this requires many jars)? Thoughts?
java maven executable-jar apache-beam
add a comment |
I'm working on a project with many Beam pipelines written in Java that needs to be packaged as a jar file for execution from our job scheduler. I've attempted to use build profiles for creating a jar for each main but this seems messy and I've had issues with dependency conflicts (with beam-sdks-java-io-amazon-web-services when its not used its still looking for required region options). I'm also just looking for overall sustainable project structure advice for a growing Beam code base.
What are the best practices for packaging pipelines to be executed on a schedule? Should I package multiple pipelines together so that I can execute each pipeline using the pipeline name and pipeline options parameters, if so, how? (potentially using some sort of master runner main that executes pipelines based on input parameters) Or should each pipeline be its own Maven project (this requires many jars)? Thoughts?
java maven executable-jar apache-beam
I'm working on a project with many Beam pipelines written in Java that needs to be packaged as a jar file for execution from our job scheduler. I've attempted to use build profiles for creating a jar for each main but this seems messy and I've had issues with dependency conflicts (with beam-sdks-java-io-amazon-web-services when its not used its still looking for required region options). I'm also just looking for overall sustainable project structure advice for a growing Beam code base.
What are the best practices for packaging pipelines to be executed on a schedule? Should I package multiple pipelines together so that I can execute each pipeline using the pipeline name and pipeline options parameters, if so, how? (potentially using some sort of master runner main that executes pipelines based on input parameters) Or should each pipeline be its own Maven project (this requires many jars)? Thoughts?
java maven executable-jar apache-beam
java maven executable-jar apache-beam
asked Jan 4 at 16:08
pnadolnypnadolny
164
164
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I don't think there's a recommended way of solving this. Each way has benefits and downsides (e.g. consider the effort of updating the pipelines).
I think the common jar solution is fine if it works for you. E.g., there are multiple Beam example pipelines in the same package, and you run them by specifying the main class. It is similar to what you are trying to achieve.
Whether you need a master main also depends on specifics of your project and environment. It may be sufficient to just use java -cp mainclass
and get around without extra management code.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54042457%2fpackaging-multiple-apache-beam-pipelines-in-one-jar-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think there's a recommended way of solving this. Each way has benefits and downsides (e.g. consider the effort of updating the pipelines).
I think the common jar solution is fine if it works for you. E.g., there are multiple Beam example pipelines in the same package, and you run them by specifying the main class. It is similar to what you are trying to achieve.
Whether you need a master main also depends on specifics of your project and environment. It may be sufficient to just use java -cp mainclass
and get around without extra management code.
add a comment |
I don't think there's a recommended way of solving this. Each way has benefits and downsides (e.g. consider the effort of updating the pipelines).
I think the common jar solution is fine if it works for you. E.g., there are multiple Beam example pipelines in the same package, and you run them by specifying the main class. It is similar to what you are trying to achieve.
Whether you need a master main also depends on specifics of your project and environment. It may be sufficient to just use java -cp mainclass
and get around without extra management code.
add a comment |
I don't think there's a recommended way of solving this. Each way has benefits and downsides (e.g. consider the effort of updating the pipelines).
I think the common jar solution is fine if it works for you. E.g., there are multiple Beam example pipelines in the same package, and you run them by specifying the main class. It is similar to what you are trying to achieve.
Whether you need a master main also depends on specifics of your project and environment. It may be sufficient to just use java -cp mainclass
and get around without extra management code.
I don't think there's a recommended way of solving this. Each way has benefits and downsides (e.g. consider the effort of updating the pipelines).
I think the common jar solution is fine if it works for you. E.g., there are multiple Beam example pipelines in the same package, and you run them by specifying the main class. It is similar to what you are trying to achieve.
Whether you need a master main also depends on specifics of your project and environment. It may be sufficient to just use java -cp mainclass
and get around without extra management code.
answered Jan 4 at 16:44
AntonAnton
1,187216
1,187216
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54042457%2fpackaging-multiple-apache-beam-pipelines-in-one-jar-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown