How to add TypeScript type safety to my redux action?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I'm writing my application in TypeScript and I'm using Redux to keep track of my app state. My redux store state looks something like this:



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected : ISelectedSettings;
[key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing : number;
[key : string] : number | boolean;
}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
[key : string] : number | number | undefined;
}


I created the following action to let me update the store however the setPropertyValue function is not ideal since it has no type safety!



//How to add type safety to this function?
const setPropertyValue = ( property : string, value : any ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction extends Action {
type : string;
payload : {
property : string;
value : any;
};
}


I can use this action in my code this way:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );


This works, but since there is no type safety in the setPropertyValue function there is nothing restricting me from feeding invalid values into the function like this:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //invalid since IGridSettings doesn't have a 'size' property
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //value should be a boolean not a number
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' ); //value should be a number not a string


Is there a way to rewrite the setPropertyValue function so that it only accepts arguments that are valid for the property name found in AppState. Also the value passed in must correspond to the correct type for the selected property.



Perhaps using a string array for the property to change is not ideal but I don't know of a better way to target only the properties that are available in AppState.










share|improve this question

























  • Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 14:57











  • I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:01




















0















I'm writing my application in TypeScript and I'm using Redux to keep track of my app state. My redux store state looks something like this:



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected : ISelectedSettings;
[key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing : number;
[key : string] : number | boolean;
}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
[key : string] : number | number | undefined;
}


I created the following action to let me update the store however the setPropertyValue function is not ideal since it has no type safety!



//How to add type safety to this function?
const setPropertyValue = ( property : string, value : any ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction extends Action {
type : string;
payload : {
property : string;
value : any;
};
}


I can use this action in my code this way:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );


This works, but since there is no type safety in the setPropertyValue function there is nothing restricting me from feeding invalid values into the function like this:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //invalid since IGridSettings doesn't have a 'size' property
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //value should be a boolean not a number
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' ); //value should be a number not a string


Is there a way to rewrite the setPropertyValue function so that it only accepts arguments that are valid for the property name found in AppState. Also the value passed in must correspond to the correct type for the selected property.



Perhaps using a string array for the property to change is not ideal but I don't know of a better way to target only the properties that are available in AppState.










share|improve this question

























  • Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 14:57











  • I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:01
















0












0








0


1






I'm writing my application in TypeScript and I'm using Redux to keep track of my app state. My redux store state looks something like this:



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected : ISelectedSettings;
[key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing : number;
[key : string] : number | boolean;
}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
[key : string] : number | number | undefined;
}


I created the following action to let me update the store however the setPropertyValue function is not ideal since it has no type safety!



//How to add type safety to this function?
const setPropertyValue = ( property : string, value : any ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction extends Action {
type : string;
payload : {
property : string;
value : any;
};
}


I can use this action in my code this way:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );


This works, but since there is no type safety in the setPropertyValue function there is nothing restricting me from feeding invalid values into the function like this:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //invalid since IGridSettings doesn't have a 'size' property
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //value should be a boolean not a number
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' ); //value should be a number not a string


Is there a way to rewrite the setPropertyValue function so that it only accepts arguments that are valid for the property name found in AppState. Also the value passed in must correspond to the correct type for the selected property.



Perhaps using a string array for the property to change is not ideal but I don't know of a better way to target only the properties that are available in AppState.










share|improve this question
















I'm writing my application in TypeScript and I'm using Redux to keep track of my app state. My redux store state looks something like this:



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected : ISelectedSettings;
[key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing : number;
[key : string] : number | boolean;
}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
[key : string] : number | number | undefined;
}


I created the following action to let me update the store however the setPropertyValue function is not ideal since it has no type safety!



//How to add type safety to this function?
const setPropertyValue = ( property : string, value : any ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction extends Action {
type : string;
payload : {
property : string;
value : any;
};
}


I can use this action in my code this way:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );


This works, but since there is no type safety in the setPropertyValue function there is nothing restricting me from feeding invalid values into the function like this:



setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //invalid since IGridSettings doesn't have a 'size' property
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //value should be a boolean not a number
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' ); //value should be a number not a string


Is there a way to rewrite the setPropertyValue function so that it only accepts arguments that are valid for the property name found in AppState. Also the value passed in must correspond to the correct type for the selected property.



Perhaps using a string array for the property to change is not ideal but I don't know of a better way to target only the properties that are available in AppState.







typescript redux type-safety






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 15:03







MarekKnows.com

















asked Jan 4 at 14:54









MarekKnows.comMarekKnows.com

355213




355213













  • Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 14:57











  • I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:01





















  • Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 14:57











  • I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:01



















Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 14:57





Are the index sigantures necessary for your use case or did you just add them to allow indexing ? (ex: [key : string] : IGridSettings | ISelectedSettings;)

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 14:57













I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:01







I needed to add the index signatures to get rid of an error message somewhere along the way. Without them, the TypeScript code would not compile for me.

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:01














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














If you need the index signature then there is no way to validate the keys of the type (since after all the index signature would mean the class in indexable by any key, so any key would be valid)



To validate taht a string is a key of a type we can use the keyof operator, in conjuction with some generic type parameters (to capture the actual key passed in)



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected: ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing: number;

}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
}

const setPropertyValue = <KApp extends keyof AppState, KAppProp extends keyof AppState[KApp]>( property : [KApp, KAppProp], value : AppState[KApp][KAppProp] ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction {
type : string;
payload : {
property : PropertyKey;
value : any;
};
}

setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' );// err





share|improve this answer
























  • In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:22













  • should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    @MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:25











  • thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:26












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54041309%2fhow-to-add-typescript-type-safety-to-my-redux-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














If you need the index signature then there is no way to validate the keys of the type (since after all the index signature would mean the class in indexable by any key, so any key would be valid)



To validate taht a string is a key of a type we can use the keyof operator, in conjuction with some generic type parameters (to capture the actual key passed in)



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected: ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing: number;

}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
}

const setPropertyValue = <KApp extends keyof AppState, KAppProp extends keyof AppState[KApp]>( property : [KApp, KAppProp], value : AppState[KApp][KAppProp] ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction {
type : string;
payload : {
property : PropertyKey;
value : any;
};
}

setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' );// err





share|improve this answer
























  • In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:22













  • should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    @MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:25











  • thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:26
















1














If you need the index signature then there is no way to validate the keys of the type (since after all the index signature would mean the class in indexable by any key, so any key would be valid)



To validate taht a string is a key of a type we can use the keyof operator, in conjuction with some generic type parameters (to capture the actual key passed in)



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected: ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing: number;

}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
}

const setPropertyValue = <KApp extends keyof AppState, KAppProp extends keyof AppState[KApp]>( property : [KApp, KAppProp], value : AppState[KApp][KAppProp] ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction {
type : string;
payload : {
property : PropertyKey;
value : any;
};
}

setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' );// err





share|improve this answer
























  • In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:22













  • should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    @MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:25











  • thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:26














1












1








1







If you need the index signature then there is no way to validate the keys of the type (since after all the index signature would mean the class in indexable by any key, so any key would be valid)



To validate taht a string is a key of a type we can use the keyof operator, in conjuction with some generic type parameters (to capture the actual key passed in)



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected: ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing: number;

}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
}

const setPropertyValue = <KApp extends keyof AppState, KAppProp extends keyof AppState[KApp]>( property : [KApp, KAppProp], value : AppState[KApp][KAppProp] ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction {
type : string;
payload : {
property : PropertyKey;
value : any;
};
}

setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' );// err





share|improve this answer













If you need the index signature then there is no way to validate the keys of the type (since after all the index signature would mean the class in indexable by any key, so any key would be valid)



To validate taht a string is a key of a type we can use the keyof operator, in conjuction with some generic type parameters (to capture the actual key passed in)



interface AppState {
readonly grid : IGridSettings;
readonly selected: ISelectedSettings;
}

interface IGridSettings {
readonly extents : number;
readonly isXY : boolean;
readonly isXZ : boolean;
readonly isYZ : boolean;
readonly spacing: number;

}

interface ISelectedSettings {
readonly bodyColor : number;
readonly colorGlow : number;
readonly lineColor : number;
readonly selection : number | undefined;
}

const setPropertyValue = <KApp extends keyof AppState, KAppProp extends keyof AppState[KApp]>( property : [KApp, KAppProp], value : AppState[KApp][KAppProp] ) : SetPropertyValueAction => ( {
type: 'SET_PROPERTY_VALUE',
payload: {
property,
value,
}
} );

interface SetPropertyValueAction {
type : string;
payload : {
property : PropertyKey;
value : any;
};
}

setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'extents'], 100 );
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'size'], 100 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['grid', 'isXY'], -1 ); //err
setPropertyValue( ['selected', 'bodyColor'], '255' );// err






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 4 at 15:09









Titian Cernicova-DragomirTitian Cernicova-Dragomir

74.5k35371




74.5k35371













  • In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:22













  • should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    @MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:25











  • thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:26



















  • In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:22













  • should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:24






  • 1





    @MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

    – Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
    Jan 4 at 15:25











  • thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

    – MarekKnows.com
    Jan 4 at 15:26

















In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:22







In the interface SetPropertyValueAction, you say that property is of type PropertyKey What is PropertyKey and how is that defined?

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:22















should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:24





should SetPropertyValueAction 's value also be something other than any?

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:24




1




1





PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 15:24





PropertyKey is defined in lib.d.ts (the default ts library) it's just any key (a key can be string | number | symbol)

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 15:24




1




1





@MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 15:25





@MarekKnows.com I could be .. but you would need to add generics to SetPropertyValueAction I can provide a sample of what that would look like

– Titian Cernicova-Dragomir
Jan 4 at 15:25













thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:26





thanks, I'll give this a try and see if the compiler complains about me removing the index signature.

– MarekKnows.com
Jan 4 at 15:26




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54041309%2fhow-to-add-typescript-type-safety-to-my-redux-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Monofisismo

Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

Olmecas