Reassigning a slice parameter acts differently












-1















package main

import "fmt"

func main() {
paths := string{"hello", "world", "mars"}
var result = delete(paths, 1)
fmt.Println(result)
fmt.Println(paths)
}

func delete(paths string, index int) string {
paths = append(paths[:index], paths[index+1:]...)
return paths
}


The result of the code above is the following:




[hello mars]



[hello mars mars]




As you see, the second fmt.Println(paths) obviously uses the modified slice but does not use the reassigned value. Why is that? I was expecting it to print [hello mars] like in the print before.



I know that paths being passed is not the same slice as paths parameter in the delete() function expect for referencing the same underlying array. But I still don't understand how I changed the underlying array of the paths being passed to delete function as it prints [hello mars mars] instead of [hello world mars].










share|improve this question



























    -1















    package main

    import "fmt"

    func main() {
    paths := string{"hello", "world", "mars"}
    var result = delete(paths, 1)
    fmt.Println(result)
    fmt.Println(paths)
    }

    func delete(paths string, index int) string {
    paths = append(paths[:index], paths[index+1:]...)
    return paths
    }


    The result of the code above is the following:




    [hello mars]



    [hello mars mars]




    As you see, the second fmt.Println(paths) obviously uses the modified slice but does not use the reassigned value. Why is that? I was expecting it to print [hello mars] like in the print before.



    I know that paths being passed is not the same slice as paths parameter in the delete() function expect for referencing the same underlying array. But I still don't understand how I changed the underlying array of the paths being passed to delete function as it prints [hello mars mars] instead of [hello world mars].










    share|improve this question

























      -1












      -1








      -1








      package main

      import "fmt"

      func main() {
      paths := string{"hello", "world", "mars"}
      var result = delete(paths, 1)
      fmt.Println(result)
      fmt.Println(paths)
      }

      func delete(paths string, index int) string {
      paths = append(paths[:index], paths[index+1:]...)
      return paths
      }


      The result of the code above is the following:




      [hello mars]



      [hello mars mars]




      As you see, the second fmt.Println(paths) obviously uses the modified slice but does not use the reassigned value. Why is that? I was expecting it to print [hello mars] like in the print before.



      I know that paths being passed is not the same slice as paths parameter in the delete() function expect for referencing the same underlying array. But I still don't understand how I changed the underlying array of the paths being passed to delete function as it prints [hello mars mars] instead of [hello world mars].










      share|improve this question














      package main

      import "fmt"

      func main() {
      paths := string{"hello", "world", "mars"}
      var result = delete(paths, 1)
      fmt.Println(result)
      fmt.Println(paths)
      }

      func delete(paths string, index int) string {
      paths = append(paths[:index], paths[index+1:]...)
      return paths
      }


      The result of the code above is the following:




      [hello mars]



      [hello mars mars]




      As you see, the second fmt.Println(paths) obviously uses the modified slice but does not use the reassigned value. Why is that? I was expecting it to print [hello mars] like in the print before.



      I know that paths being passed is not the same slice as paths parameter in the delete() function expect for referencing the same underlying array. But I still don't understand how I changed the underlying array of the paths being passed to delete function as it prints [hello mars mars] instead of [hello world mars].







      go






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 1 at 1:57









      TarikTarik

      36.4k67205309




      36.4k67205309
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Because, as you said, the same underlying array is in use. When you do the append, paths[:1] is a slice of length 1 and capacity 3, and paths[2:] is a slice of length 1, so there is enough room in the underlying array of the first slice to append the new value without allocating a new array. paths in main is still a slice of length 3 since it was never modified, but since the underlying array was modified (specifically element 1), you see the value that you see.



          You may want to take a look at https://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals if you haven't already.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53992594%2freassigning-a-slice-parameter-acts-differently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Because, as you said, the same underlying array is in use. When you do the append, paths[:1] is a slice of length 1 and capacity 3, and paths[2:] is a slice of length 1, so there is enough room in the underlying array of the first slice to append the new value without allocating a new array. paths in main is still a slice of length 3 since it was never modified, but since the underlying array was modified (specifically element 1), you see the value that you see.



            You may want to take a look at https://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals if you haven't already.






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              Because, as you said, the same underlying array is in use. When you do the append, paths[:1] is a slice of length 1 and capacity 3, and paths[2:] is a slice of length 1, so there is enough room in the underlying array of the first slice to append the new value without allocating a new array. paths in main is still a slice of length 3 since it was never modified, but since the underlying array was modified (specifically element 1), you see the value that you see.



              You may want to take a look at https://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals if you haven't already.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                Because, as you said, the same underlying array is in use. When you do the append, paths[:1] is a slice of length 1 and capacity 3, and paths[2:] is a slice of length 1, so there is enough room in the underlying array of the first slice to append the new value without allocating a new array. paths in main is still a slice of length 3 since it was never modified, but since the underlying array was modified (specifically element 1), you see the value that you see.



                You may want to take a look at https://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals if you haven't already.






                share|improve this answer













                Because, as you said, the same underlying array is in use. When you do the append, paths[:1] is a slice of length 1 and capacity 3, and paths[2:] is a slice of length 1, so there is enough room in the underlying array of the first slice to append the new value without allocating a new array. paths in main is still a slice of length 3 since it was never modified, but since the underlying array was modified (specifically element 1), you see the value that you see.



                You may want to take a look at https://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals if you haven't already.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 1 at 2:22









                Andy SchweigAndy Schweig

                4,6602916




                4,6602916
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53992594%2freassigning-a-slice-parameter-acts-differently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mossoró

                    Cannot access a disposed object : DataContext

                    Can't read property showImagePicker of undefined in react native iOS