error when applying a function in a pipe function
I have the following results and I am trying to apply a function within a pipe command.
The code I am using which gives me the error is the following:
sample_rmse_tbl <- dataset %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
Which gives the following error:
Error in mutate_impl(.data, dots) :
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
The data uses the sun spots data and the code that I have is the following (the error I run into is the last line of the code):
I have followed the tutorial carefully and everything works for me up until this line of code.
--- The code is a cut down version of this tutorial: https://www.business-science.io/timeseries-analysis/2018/04/18/keras-lstm-sunspots-time-series-prediction.html
# Core Tidyverse
library(tidyverse)
library(glue)
library(forcats)
# Time Series
library(timetk)
library(tidyquant)
library(tibbletime)
# Visualization
library(cowplot)
# Preprocessing
library(recipes)
# Sampling / Accuracy
library(rsample)
library(yardstick)
# Modeling
library(keras)
sun_spots <- datasets::sunspot.month %>%
tk_tbl() %>%
mutate(index = as_date(index)) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
sun_spots
############################################
periods_train <- 12 * 50
periods_test <- 12 * 10
skip_span <- 12 * 20
rolling_origin_resamples <- rolling_origin(
sun_spots,
initial = periods_train,
assess = periods_test,
cumulative = FALSE,
skip = skip_span
)
rolling_origin_resamples
############################################
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate)
}
safe_rmse <- possibly(rmse_calculation, otherwise = NA)
safe_rmse(prediction_tbl)
}
#############################################
predict_keras_lstm <- function(split, epochs = 300, ...) {
lstm_prediction <- function(split, epochs, ...) {
# 5.1.2 Data Setup
df_trn <- training(split)
df_tst <- testing(split)
df <- bind_rows(
df_trn %>% add_column(key = "training"),
df_tst %>% add_column(key = "testing")
) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
# 5.1.3 Preprocessing
rec_obj <- recipe(value ~ ., df) %>%
step_sqrt(value) %>%
step_center(value) %>%
step_scale(value) %>%
prep()
df_processed_tbl <- bake(rec_obj, df)
center_history <- rec_obj$steps[[2]]$means["value"]
scale_history <- rec_obj$steps[[3]]$sds["value"]
# 5.1.4 LSTM Plan
lag_setting <- 120 # = nrow(df_tst)
batch_size <- 40
train_length <- 440
tsteps <- 1
epochs <- epochs
# 5.1.5 Train/Test Setup
lag_train_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "training") %>%
tail(train_length)
x_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value_lag
x_train_arr <- array(data = x_train_vec, dim = c(length(x_train_vec), 1, 1))
y_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value
y_train_arr <- array(data = y_train_vec, dim = c(length(y_train_vec), 1))
lag_test_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(
value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)
) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "testing")
x_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value_lag
x_test_arr <- array(data = x_test_vec, dim = c(length(x_test_vec), 1, 1))
y_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value
y_test_arr <- array(data = y_test_vec, dim = c(length(y_test_vec), 1))
# 5.1.6 LSTM Model
model <- keras_model_sequential()
model %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
input_shape = c(tsteps, 1),
batch_size = batch_size,
return_sequences = TRUE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
return_sequences = FALSE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_dense(units = 1)
model %>%
compile(loss = 'mae', optimizer = 'adam')
# 5.1.7 Fitting LSTM
for (i in 1:epochs) {
model %>% fit(x = x_train_arr,
y = y_train_arr,
batch_size = batch_size,
epochs = 1,
verbose = 1,
shuffle = FALSE)
model %>% reset_states()
cat("Epoch: ", i)
}
# 5.1.8 Predict and Return Tidy Data
# Make Predictions
pred_out <- model %>%
predict(x_test_arr, batch_size = batch_size) %>%
.[,1]
# Retransform values
pred_tbl <- tibble(
index = lag_test_tbl$index,
value = (pred_out * scale_history + center_history)^2
)
# Combine actual data with predictions
tbl_1 <- df_trn %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_2 <- df_tst %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_3 <- pred_tbl %>%
add_column(key = "predict")
# Create time_bind_rows() to solve dplyr issue
time_bind_rows <- function(data_1, data_2, index) {
index_expr <- enquo(index)
bind_rows(data_1, data_2) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = !! index_expr)
}
ret <- list(tbl_1, tbl_2, tbl_3) %>%
reduce(time_bind_rows, index = index) %>%
arrange(key, index) %>%
mutate(key = as_factor(key))
return(ret)
}
safe_lstm <- possibly(lstm_prediction, otherwise = NA)
safe_lstm(split, epochs, ...)
}
#################################################
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl <- rolling_origin_resamples %>%
mutate(predict = map(splits, predict_keras_lstm, epochs = 10))
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
map_dbl(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict, calc_rmse)
sample_rmse_tbl <- sample_predictions_lstm_tbl %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
EDIT1:
[[11]]
# A time tibble: 840 x 3
# Index: index
index value key
<date> <dbl> <fct>
1 1949-11-01 144. actual
2 1949-12-01 118. actual
3 1950-01-01 102. actual
4 1950-02-01 94.8 actual
5 1950-03-01 110. actual
6 1950-04-01 113. actual
7 1950-05-01 106. actual
8 1950-06-01 83.6 actual
9 1950-07-01 91 actual
10 1950-08-01 85.2 actual
# ... with 830 more rows
EDIT2:
I come up with a "workaround" but I am getting different results to the article.
temp <- NULL
sample_rmse_tbl <- NULL
for(i in 1:length(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict)){
temp <- calc_rmse(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict[[i]])
sample_rmse_tbl[[i]] <- temp
}
sample_rmse_tbl <- do.call(rbind.data.frame, sample_rmse_tbl)
sample_rmse_tbl %>%
setNames(., c("metric", "estimator", "rmse")) %>%
mutate(id = row_number()) %>%
select(id, rmse)
r
add a comment |
I have the following results and I am trying to apply a function within a pipe command.
The code I am using which gives me the error is the following:
sample_rmse_tbl <- dataset %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
Which gives the following error:
Error in mutate_impl(.data, dots) :
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
The data uses the sun spots data and the code that I have is the following (the error I run into is the last line of the code):
I have followed the tutorial carefully and everything works for me up until this line of code.
--- The code is a cut down version of this tutorial: https://www.business-science.io/timeseries-analysis/2018/04/18/keras-lstm-sunspots-time-series-prediction.html
# Core Tidyverse
library(tidyverse)
library(glue)
library(forcats)
# Time Series
library(timetk)
library(tidyquant)
library(tibbletime)
# Visualization
library(cowplot)
# Preprocessing
library(recipes)
# Sampling / Accuracy
library(rsample)
library(yardstick)
# Modeling
library(keras)
sun_spots <- datasets::sunspot.month %>%
tk_tbl() %>%
mutate(index = as_date(index)) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
sun_spots
############################################
periods_train <- 12 * 50
periods_test <- 12 * 10
skip_span <- 12 * 20
rolling_origin_resamples <- rolling_origin(
sun_spots,
initial = periods_train,
assess = periods_test,
cumulative = FALSE,
skip = skip_span
)
rolling_origin_resamples
############################################
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate)
}
safe_rmse <- possibly(rmse_calculation, otherwise = NA)
safe_rmse(prediction_tbl)
}
#############################################
predict_keras_lstm <- function(split, epochs = 300, ...) {
lstm_prediction <- function(split, epochs, ...) {
# 5.1.2 Data Setup
df_trn <- training(split)
df_tst <- testing(split)
df <- bind_rows(
df_trn %>% add_column(key = "training"),
df_tst %>% add_column(key = "testing")
) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
# 5.1.3 Preprocessing
rec_obj <- recipe(value ~ ., df) %>%
step_sqrt(value) %>%
step_center(value) %>%
step_scale(value) %>%
prep()
df_processed_tbl <- bake(rec_obj, df)
center_history <- rec_obj$steps[[2]]$means["value"]
scale_history <- rec_obj$steps[[3]]$sds["value"]
# 5.1.4 LSTM Plan
lag_setting <- 120 # = nrow(df_tst)
batch_size <- 40
train_length <- 440
tsteps <- 1
epochs <- epochs
# 5.1.5 Train/Test Setup
lag_train_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "training") %>%
tail(train_length)
x_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value_lag
x_train_arr <- array(data = x_train_vec, dim = c(length(x_train_vec), 1, 1))
y_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value
y_train_arr <- array(data = y_train_vec, dim = c(length(y_train_vec), 1))
lag_test_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(
value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)
) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "testing")
x_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value_lag
x_test_arr <- array(data = x_test_vec, dim = c(length(x_test_vec), 1, 1))
y_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value
y_test_arr <- array(data = y_test_vec, dim = c(length(y_test_vec), 1))
# 5.1.6 LSTM Model
model <- keras_model_sequential()
model %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
input_shape = c(tsteps, 1),
batch_size = batch_size,
return_sequences = TRUE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
return_sequences = FALSE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_dense(units = 1)
model %>%
compile(loss = 'mae', optimizer = 'adam')
# 5.1.7 Fitting LSTM
for (i in 1:epochs) {
model %>% fit(x = x_train_arr,
y = y_train_arr,
batch_size = batch_size,
epochs = 1,
verbose = 1,
shuffle = FALSE)
model %>% reset_states()
cat("Epoch: ", i)
}
# 5.1.8 Predict and Return Tidy Data
# Make Predictions
pred_out <- model %>%
predict(x_test_arr, batch_size = batch_size) %>%
.[,1]
# Retransform values
pred_tbl <- tibble(
index = lag_test_tbl$index,
value = (pred_out * scale_history + center_history)^2
)
# Combine actual data with predictions
tbl_1 <- df_trn %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_2 <- df_tst %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_3 <- pred_tbl %>%
add_column(key = "predict")
# Create time_bind_rows() to solve dplyr issue
time_bind_rows <- function(data_1, data_2, index) {
index_expr <- enquo(index)
bind_rows(data_1, data_2) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = !! index_expr)
}
ret <- list(tbl_1, tbl_2, tbl_3) %>%
reduce(time_bind_rows, index = index) %>%
arrange(key, index) %>%
mutate(key = as_factor(key))
return(ret)
}
safe_lstm <- possibly(lstm_prediction, otherwise = NA)
safe_lstm(split, epochs, ...)
}
#################################################
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl <- rolling_origin_resamples %>%
mutate(predict = map(splits, predict_keras_lstm, epochs = 10))
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
map_dbl(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict, calc_rmse)
sample_rmse_tbl <- sample_predictions_lstm_tbl %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
EDIT1:
[[11]]
# A time tibble: 840 x 3
# Index: index
index value key
<date> <dbl> <fct>
1 1949-11-01 144. actual
2 1949-12-01 118. actual
3 1950-01-01 102. actual
4 1950-02-01 94.8 actual
5 1950-03-01 110. actual
6 1950-04-01 113. actual
7 1950-05-01 106. actual
8 1950-06-01 83.6 actual
9 1950-07-01 91 actual
10 1950-08-01 85.2 actual
# ... with 830 more rows
EDIT2:
I come up with a "workaround" but I am getting different results to the article.
temp <- NULL
sample_rmse_tbl <- NULL
for(i in 1:length(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict)){
temp <- calc_rmse(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict[[i]])
sample_rmse_tbl[[i]] <- temp
}
sample_rmse_tbl <- do.call(rbind.data.frame, sample_rmse_tbl)
sample_rmse_tbl %>%
setNames(., c("metric", "estimator", "rmse")) %>%
mutate(id = row_number()) %>%
select(id, rmse)
r
1
I am getting a list ofNA
s withsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after runningsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector whilemutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.
– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35
add a comment |
I have the following results and I am trying to apply a function within a pipe command.
The code I am using which gives me the error is the following:
sample_rmse_tbl <- dataset %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
Which gives the following error:
Error in mutate_impl(.data, dots) :
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
The data uses the sun spots data and the code that I have is the following (the error I run into is the last line of the code):
I have followed the tutorial carefully and everything works for me up until this line of code.
--- The code is a cut down version of this tutorial: https://www.business-science.io/timeseries-analysis/2018/04/18/keras-lstm-sunspots-time-series-prediction.html
# Core Tidyverse
library(tidyverse)
library(glue)
library(forcats)
# Time Series
library(timetk)
library(tidyquant)
library(tibbletime)
# Visualization
library(cowplot)
# Preprocessing
library(recipes)
# Sampling / Accuracy
library(rsample)
library(yardstick)
# Modeling
library(keras)
sun_spots <- datasets::sunspot.month %>%
tk_tbl() %>%
mutate(index = as_date(index)) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
sun_spots
############################################
periods_train <- 12 * 50
periods_test <- 12 * 10
skip_span <- 12 * 20
rolling_origin_resamples <- rolling_origin(
sun_spots,
initial = periods_train,
assess = periods_test,
cumulative = FALSE,
skip = skip_span
)
rolling_origin_resamples
############################################
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate)
}
safe_rmse <- possibly(rmse_calculation, otherwise = NA)
safe_rmse(prediction_tbl)
}
#############################################
predict_keras_lstm <- function(split, epochs = 300, ...) {
lstm_prediction <- function(split, epochs, ...) {
# 5.1.2 Data Setup
df_trn <- training(split)
df_tst <- testing(split)
df <- bind_rows(
df_trn %>% add_column(key = "training"),
df_tst %>% add_column(key = "testing")
) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
# 5.1.3 Preprocessing
rec_obj <- recipe(value ~ ., df) %>%
step_sqrt(value) %>%
step_center(value) %>%
step_scale(value) %>%
prep()
df_processed_tbl <- bake(rec_obj, df)
center_history <- rec_obj$steps[[2]]$means["value"]
scale_history <- rec_obj$steps[[3]]$sds["value"]
# 5.1.4 LSTM Plan
lag_setting <- 120 # = nrow(df_tst)
batch_size <- 40
train_length <- 440
tsteps <- 1
epochs <- epochs
# 5.1.5 Train/Test Setup
lag_train_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "training") %>%
tail(train_length)
x_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value_lag
x_train_arr <- array(data = x_train_vec, dim = c(length(x_train_vec), 1, 1))
y_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value
y_train_arr <- array(data = y_train_vec, dim = c(length(y_train_vec), 1))
lag_test_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(
value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)
) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "testing")
x_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value_lag
x_test_arr <- array(data = x_test_vec, dim = c(length(x_test_vec), 1, 1))
y_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value
y_test_arr <- array(data = y_test_vec, dim = c(length(y_test_vec), 1))
# 5.1.6 LSTM Model
model <- keras_model_sequential()
model %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
input_shape = c(tsteps, 1),
batch_size = batch_size,
return_sequences = TRUE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
return_sequences = FALSE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_dense(units = 1)
model %>%
compile(loss = 'mae', optimizer = 'adam')
# 5.1.7 Fitting LSTM
for (i in 1:epochs) {
model %>% fit(x = x_train_arr,
y = y_train_arr,
batch_size = batch_size,
epochs = 1,
verbose = 1,
shuffle = FALSE)
model %>% reset_states()
cat("Epoch: ", i)
}
# 5.1.8 Predict and Return Tidy Data
# Make Predictions
pred_out <- model %>%
predict(x_test_arr, batch_size = batch_size) %>%
.[,1]
# Retransform values
pred_tbl <- tibble(
index = lag_test_tbl$index,
value = (pred_out * scale_history + center_history)^2
)
# Combine actual data with predictions
tbl_1 <- df_trn %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_2 <- df_tst %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_3 <- pred_tbl %>%
add_column(key = "predict")
# Create time_bind_rows() to solve dplyr issue
time_bind_rows <- function(data_1, data_2, index) {
index_expr <- enquo(index)
bind_rows(data_1, data_2) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = !! index_expr)
}
ret <- list(tbl_1, tbl_2, tbl_3) %>%
reduce(time_bind_rows, index = index) %>%
arrange(key, index) %>%
mutate(key = as_factor(key))
return(ret)
}
safe_lstm <- possibly(lstm_prediction, otherwise = NA)
safe_lstm(split, epochs, ...)
}
#################################################
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl <- rolling_origin_resamples %>%
mutate(predict = map(splits, predict_keras_lstm, epochs = 10))
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
map_dbl(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict, calc_rmse)
sample_rmse_tbl <- sample_predictions_lstm_tbl %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
EDIT1:
[[11]]
# A time tibble: 840 x 3
# Index: index
index value key
<date> <dbl> <fct>
1 1949-11-01 144. actual
2 1949-12-01 118. actual
3 1950-01-01 102. actual
4 1950-02-01 94.8 actual
5 1950-03-01 110. actual
6 1950-04-01 113. actual
7 1950-05-01 106. actual
8 1950-06-01 83.6 actual
9 1950-07-01 91 actual
10 1950-08-01 85.2 actual
# ... with 830 more rows
EDIT2:
I come up with a "workaround" but I am getting different results to the article.
temp <- NULL
sample_rmse_tbl <- NULL
for(i in 1:length(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict)){
temp <- calc_rmse(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict[[i]])
sample_rmse_tbl[[i]] <- temp
}
sample_rmse_tbl <- do.call(rbind.data.frame, sample_rmse_tbl)
sample_rmse_tbl %>%
setNames(., c("metric", "estimator", "rmse")) %>%
mutate(id = row_number()) %>%
select(id, rmse)
r
I have the following results and I am trying to apply a function within a pipe command.
The code I am using which gives me the error is the following:
sample_rmse_tbl <- dataset %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
Which gives the following error:
Error in mutate_impl(.data, dots) :
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
The data uses the sun spots data and the code that I have is the following (the error I run into is the last line of the code):
I have followed the tutorial carefully and everything works for me up until this line of code.
--- The code is a cut down version of this tutorial: https://www.business-science.io/timeseries-analysis/2018/04/18/keras-lstm-sunspots-time-series-prediction.html
# Core Tidyverse
library(tidyverse)
library(glue)
library(forcats)
# Time Series
library(timetk)
library(tidyquant)
library(tibbletime)
# Visualization
library(cowplot)
# Preprocessing
library(recipes)
# Sampling / Accuracy
library(rsample)
library(yardstick)
# Modeling
library(keras)
sun_spots <- datasets::sunspot.month %>%
tk_tbl() %>%
mutate(index = as_date(index)) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
sun_spots
############################################
periods_train <- 12 * 50
periods_test <- 12 * 10
skip_span <- 12 * 20
rolling_origin_resamples <- rolling_origin(
sun_spots,
initial = periods_train,
assess = periods_test,
cumulative = FALSE,
skip = skip_span
)
rolling_origin_resamples
############################################
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate)
}
safe_rmse <- possibly(rmse_calculation, otherwise = NA)
safe_rmse(prediction_tbl)
}
#############################################
predict_keras_lstm <- function(split, epochs = 300, ...) {
lstm_prediction <- function(split, epochs, ...) {
# 5.1.2 Data Setup
df_trn <- training(split)
df_tst <- testing(split)
df <- bind_rows(
df_trn %>% add_column(key = "training"),
df_tst %>% add_column(key = "testing")
) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = index)
# 5.1.3 Preprocessing
rec_obj <- recipe(value ~ ., df) %>%
step_sqrt(value) %>%
step_center(value) %>%
step_scale(value) %>%
prep()
df_processed_tbl <- bake(rec_obj, df)
center_history <- rec_obj$steps[[2]]$means["value"]
scale_history <- rec_obj$steps[[3]]$sds["value"]
# 5.1.4 LSTM Plan
lag_setting <- 120 # = nrow(df_tst)
batch_size <- 40
train_length <- 440
tsteps <- 1
epochs <- epochs
# 5.1.5 Train/Test Setup
lag_train_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "training") %>%
tail(train_length)
x_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value_lag
x_train_arr <- array(data = x_train_vec, dim = c(length(x_train_vec), 1, 1))
y_train_vec <- lag_train_tbl$value
y_train_arr <- array(data = y_train_vec, dim = c(length(y_train_vec), 1))
lag_test_tbl <- df_processed_tbl %>%
mutate(
value_lag = lag(value, n = lag_setting)
) %>%
filter(!is.na(value_lag)) %>%
filter(key == "testing")
x_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value_lag
x_test_arr <- array(data = x_test_vec, dim = c(length(x_test_vec), 1, 1))
y_test_vec <- lag_test_tbl$value
y_test_arr <- array(data = y_test_vec, dim = c(length(y_test_vec), 1))
# 5.1.6 LSTM Model
model <- keras_model_sequential()
model %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
input_shape = c(tsteps, 1),
batch_size = batch_size,
return_sequences = TRUE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_lstm(units = 50,
return_sequences = FALSE,
stateful = TRUE) %>%
layer_dense(units = 1)
model %>%
compile(loss = 'mae', optimizer = 'adam')
# 5.1.7 Fitting LSTM
for (i in 1:epochs) {
model %>% fit(x = x_train_arr,
y = y_train_arr,
batch_size = batch_size,
epochs = 1,
verbose = 1,
shuffle = FALSE)
model %>% reset_states()
cat("Epoch: ", i)
}
# 5.1.8 Predict and Return Tidy Data
# Make Predictions
pred_out <- model %>%
predict(x_test_arr, batch_size = batch_size) %>%
.[,1]
# Retransform values
pred_tbl <- tibble(
index = lag_test_tbl$index,
value = (pred_out * scale_history + center_history)^2
)
# Combine actual data with predictions
tbl_1 <- df_trn %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_2 <- df_tst %>%
add_column(key = "actual")
tbl_3 <- pred_tbl %>%
add_column(key = "predict")
# Create time_bind_rows() to solve dplyr issue
time_bind_rows <- function(data_1, data_2, index) {
index_expr <- enquo(index)
bind_rows(data_1, data_2) %>%
as_tbl_time(index = !! index_expr)
}
ret <- list(tbl_1, tbl_2, tbl_3) %>%
reduce(time_bind_rows, index = index) %>%
arrange(key, index) %>%
mutate(key = as_factor(key))
return(ret)
}
safe_lstm <- possibly(lstm_prediction, otherwise = NA)
safe_lstm(split, epochs, ...)
}
#################################################
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl <- rolling_origin_resamples %>%
mutate(predict = map(splits, predict_keras_lstm, epochs = 10))
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
map_dbl(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict, calc_rmse)
sample_rmse_tbl <- sample_predictions_lstm_tbl %>%
mutate(rmse = map_dbl(predict, calc_rmse)) %>%
select(id, rmse)
EDIT1:
[[11]]
# A time tibble: 840 x 3
# Index: index
index value key
<date> <dbl> <fct>
1 1949-11-01 144. actual
2 1949-12-01 118. actual
3 1950-01-01 102. actual
4 1950-02-01 94.8 actual
5 1950-03-01 110. actual
6 1950-04-01 113. actual
7 1950-05-01 106. actual
8 1950-06-01 83.6 actual
9 1950-07-01 91 actual
10 1950-08-01 85.2 actual
# ... with 830 more rows
EDIT2:
I come up with a "workaround" but I am getting different results to the article.
temp <- NULL
sample_rmse_tbl <- NULL
for(i in 1:length(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict)){
temp <- calc_rmse(sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict[[i]])
sample_rmse_tbl[[i]] <- temp
}
sample_rmse_tbl <- do.call(rbind.data.frame, sample_rmse_tbl)
sample_rmse_tbl %>%
setNames(., c("metric", "estimator", "rmse")) %>%
mutate(id = row_number()) %>%
select(id, rmse)
r
r
edited Jan 2 at 15:08
user113156
asked Jan 1 at 21:45
user113156user113156
9091419
9091419
1
I am getting a list ofNA
s withsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after runningsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector whilemutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.
– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35
add a comment |
1
I am getting a list ofNA
s withsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after runningsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector whilemutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.
– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35
1
1
I am getting a list of
NA
s with sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I am getting a list of
NA
s with sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after running
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after running
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
1
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
1
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector while mutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector while mutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that the function rmse()
returns a list rather than a single double value. You need to select the estimate value from this list using .$.estimate
. However, I had to remove the possibly()
call to make my solution work.
So, the new function calc_rmse()
looks like this.
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate) %>% .$.estimate
}
rmse_calculation(prediction_tbl)
}
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53999195%2ferror-when-applying-a-function-in-a-pipe-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that the function rmse()
returns a list rather than a single double value. You need to select the estimate value from this list using .$.estimate
. However, I had to remove the possibly()
call to make my solution work.
So, the new function calc_rmse()
looks like this.
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate) %>% .$.estimate
}
rmse_calculation(prediction_tbl)
}
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
add a comment |
The problem is that the function rmse()
returns a list rather than a single double value. You need to select the estimate value from this list using .$.estimate
. However, I had to remove the possibly()
call to make my solution work.
So, the new function calc_rmse()
looks like this.
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate) %>% .$.estimate
}
rmse_calculation(prediction_tbl)
}
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
add a comment |
The problem is that the function rmse()
returns a list rather than a single double value. You need to select the estimate value from this list using .$.estimate
. However, I had to remove the possibly()
call to make my solution work.
So, the new function calc_rmse()
looks like this.
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate) %>% .$.estimate
}
rmse_calculation(prediction_tbl)
}
The problem is that the function rmse()
returns a list rather than a single double value. You need to select the estimate value from this list using .$.estimate
. However, I had to remove the possibly()
call to make my solution work.
So, the new function calc_rmse()
looks like this.
calc_rmse <- function(prediction_tbl) {
rmse_calculation <- function(data) {
data %>%
spread(key = key, value = value) %>%
select(-index) %>%
filter(!is.na(predict)) %>%
rename(
truth = actual,
estimate = predict
) %>%
rmse(truth, estimate) %>% .$.estimate
}
rmse_calculation(prediction_tbl)
}
answered Jan 7 at 14:53
r0f1r0f1
167317
167317
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
add a comment |
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
This worked! Thanks
– user113156
Jan 7 at 19:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53999195%2ferror-when-applying-a-function-in-a-pipe-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I am getting a list of
NA
s withsample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:00
I have edited the original messgae with the output I get after running
sample_predictions_lstm_tbl$predict
for list [[11]]– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:04
I re-ran the code from the original post and I get the same results. Are you getting NA values still?
– user113156
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
yes i am still getting na
– akrun
Jan 1 at 22:30
1
Evaluation error: Result 1 is not a length 1 atomic vector.
map_dbl
returns a vector whilemutate
is expecting the function to return an atomic value of length 1, i.e., a scalar.– SteveM
Jan 1 at 22:35