Semaphores for checking conditions












-1














I'm having some trouble trying to figure out how to use semaphores to control sections that can only be referred to when a variable is in a specific state.



The assumptions are:

- 3 producers produce items to separate buffers A, B and C,

- 2 readers read from the buffers unless empty,

- producer A can only produce if buffer B contains an odd number of elements,

- producer B can only produce if buffer B contains an even or maximum number of elements.



How can I manage the 'if buffer B contains' conditions to avoid the race condition? Can it be done by manipulating the value of the semaphore directly or should it be done in another way?



I have so far implemented shared memory for buffers, semaphores FULL and EMPTY for each buffer and a semaphore that blocks access to the sections refering to the shared memory when in use and I can't think of a solution that would work for that.










share|improve this question






















  • Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
    – user3386109
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:22










  • For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
    – visibleman
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:27










  • It's multi-process.
    – A.Z.
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:38
















-1














I'm having some trouble trying to figure out how to use semaphores to control sections that can only be referred to when a variable is in a specific state.



The assumptions are:

- 3 producers produce items to separate buffers A, B and C,

- 2 readers read from the buffers unless empty,

- producer A can only produce if buffer B contains an odd number of elements,

- producer B can only produce if buffer B contains an even or maximum number of elements.



How can I manage the 'if buffer B contains' conditions to avoid the race condition? Can it be done by manipulating the value of the semaphore directly or should it be done in another way?



I have so far implemented shared memory for buffers, semaphores FULL and EMPTY for each buffer and a semaphore that blocks access to the sections refering to the shared memory when in use and I can't think of a solution that would work for that.










share|improve this question






















  • Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
    – user3386109
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:22










  • For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
    – visibleman
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:27










  • It's multi-process.
    – A.Z.
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:38














-1












-1








-1







I'm having some trouble trying to figure out how to use semaphores to control sections that can only be referred to when a variable is in a specific state.



The assumptions are:

- 3 producers produce items to separate buffers A, B and C,

- 2 readers read from the buffers unless empty,

- producer A can only produce if buffer B contains an odd number of elements,

- producer B can only produce if buffer B contains an even or maximum number of elements.



How can I manage the 'if buffer B contains' conditions to avoid the race condition? Can it be done by manipulating the value of the semaphore directly or should it be done in another way?



I have so far implemented shared memory for buffers, semaphores FULL and EMPTY for each buffer and a semaphore that blocks access to the sections refering to the shared memory when in use and I can't think of a solution that would work for that.










share|improve this question













I'm having some trouble trying to figure out how to use semaphores to control sections that can only be referred to when a variable is in a specific state.



The assumptions are:

- 3 producers produce items to separate buffers A, B and C,

- 2 readers read from the buffers unless empty,

- producer A can only produce if buffer B contains an odd number of elements,

- producer B can only produce if buffer B contains an even or maximum number of elements.



How can I manage the 'if buffer B contains' conditions to avoid the race condition? Can it be done by manipulating the value of the semaphore directly or should it be done in another way?



I have so far implemented shared memory for buffers, semaphores FULL and EMPTY for each buffer and a semaphore that blocks access to the sections refering to the shared memory when in use and I can't think of a solution that would work for that.







c semaphore shared-memory race-condition






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 27 '18 at 23:55









A.Z.

11




11












  • Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
    – user3386109
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:22










  • For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
    – visibleman
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:27










  • It's multi-process.
    – A.Z.
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:38


















  • Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
    – user3386109
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:22










  • For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
    – visibleman
    Dec 28 '18 at 0:27










  • It's multi-process.
    – A.Z.
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:38
















Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
– user3386109
Dec 28 '18 at 0:22




Is the code multi-threaded or multi-process?
– user3386109
Dec 28 '18 at 0:22












For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
– visibleman
Dec 28 '18 at 0:27




For a basic understanding, you can check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer%E2%80%93consumer_problem
– visibleman
Dec 28 '18 at 0:27












It's multi-process.
– A.Z.
Dec 28 '18 at 12:38




It's multi-process.
– A.Z.
Dec 28 '18 at 12:38












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53952157%2fsemaphores-for-checking-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53952157%2fsemaphores-for-checking-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Monofisismo

Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

Olmecas