Mapping key values between different size vectors












0














I am still new to scala and am having a rough time getting this functionality to work in my code.



I am trying to create a mapping of 24 hours from hour_vector and fill the "visitor" values whenever there is a visitor for the particular hour in the hour_visitors vector



val hour_visitors = Vector((10,100),(11,25),(16,200))
val hour_vector = Vector(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)

val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(a)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


This does not work as I am getting index out of bounds error (which makes sense).



However if I replace:



val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(1)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


This will map every value from the 1st index of hour_visitor.



I can re-map the values from hour_index to a list but that defeats the idea, as I am losing the "hour" key in that instance and the values will be inserted incorrectly into the 24 hour vector.



How can I use standard library to map the values from 1 vector into another only when the keys exist in both vectors and if they are not present in 1 vector then output a value of 0.



In python I could just use a merge on 2 dataframes with all.x or all.y, this scala approach is still quite confusing for me.



Thank you










share|improve this question



























    0














    I am still new to scala and am having a rough time getting this functionality to work in my code.



    I am trying to create a mapping of 24 hours from hour_vector and fill the "visitor" values whenever there is a visitor for the particular hour in the hour_visitors vector



    val hour_visitors = Vector((10,100),(11,25),(16,200))
    val hour_vector = Vector(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)

    val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(a)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


    This does not work as I am getting index out of bounds error (which makes sense).



    However if I replace:



    val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(1)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


    This will map every value from the 1st index of hour_visitor.



    I can re-map the values from hour_index to a list but that defeats the idea, as I am losing the "hour" key in that instance and the values will be inserted incorrectly into the 24 hour vector.



    How can I use standard library to map the values from 1 vector into another only when the keys exist in both vectors and if they are not present in 1 vector then output a value of 0.



    In python I could just use a merge on 2 dataframes with all.x or all.y, this scala approach is still quite confusing for me.



    Thank you










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am still new to scala and am having a rough time getting this functionality to work in my code.



      I am trying to create a mapping of 24 hours from hour_vector and fill the "visitor" values whenever there is a visitor for the particular hour in the hour_visitors vector



      val hour_visitors = Vector((10,100),(11,25),(16,200))
      val hour_vector = Vector(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)

      val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(a)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


      This does not work as I am getting index out of bounds error (which makes sense).



      However if I replace:



      val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(1)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


      This will map every value from the 1st index of hour_visitor.



      I can re-map the values from hour_index to a list but that defeats the idea, as I am losing the "hour" key in that instance and the values will be inserted incorrectly into the 24 hour vector.



      How can I use standard library to map the values from 1 vector into another only when the keys exist in both vectors and if they are not present in 1 vector then output a value of 0.



      In python I could just use a merge on 2 dataframes with all.x or all.y, this scala approach is still quite confusing for me.



      Thank you










      share|improve this question













      I am still new to scala and am having a rough time getting this functionality to work in my code.



      I am trying to create a mapping of 24 hours from hour_vector and fill the "visitor" values whenever there is a visitor for the particular hour in the hour_visitors vector



      val hour_visitors = Vector((10,100),(11,25),(16,200))
      val hour_vector = Vector(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)

      val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(a)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


      This does not work as I am getting index out of bounds error (which makes sense).



      However if I replace:



      val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map(a => a -> hour_visitors(1)._2).toMap.withDefaultValue(0)


      This will map every value from the 1st index of hour_visitor.



      I can re-map the values from hour_index to a list but that defeats the idea, as I am losing the "hour" key in that instance and the values will be inserted incorrectly into the 24 hour vector.



      How can I use standard library to map the values from 1 vector into another only when the keys exist in both vectors and if they are not present in 1 vector then output a value of 0.



      In python I could just use a merge on 2 dataframes with all.x or all.y, this scala approach is still quite confusing for me.



      Thank you







      scala






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 3:01









      user3674993

      2516




      2516
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          One approach would be to make hour_visitors a Map and use getOrElse to fetch values for the hours in hour_vector as shown below



          val map_hour_visitors = hour_visitors.toMap

          val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map( h =>
          (h, map_hour_visitors.getOrElse(h, 0))
          ).toMap
          // map_visitors_to_hours: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(
          // 0 -> 0, 5 -> 0, 10 -> 100, 14 -> 0, 20 -> 0, 1 -> 0, 6 -> 0, 21 -> 0,
          // 9 -> 0, 13 -> 0, 2 -> 0, 17 -> 0, 22 -> 0, 12 -> 0, 7 -> 0, 3 -> 0,
          // 18 -> 0, 16 -> 200, 11 -> 25, 23 -> 0, 8 -> 0, 19 -> 0, 4 -> 0, 15 -> 0
          // )





          share|improve this answer























          • This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
            – user3674993
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:34






          • 1




            @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
            – Leo C
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:54











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53953207%2fmapping-key-values-between-different-size-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          One approach would be to make hour_visitors a Map and use getOrElse to fetch values for the hours in hour_vector as shown below



          val map_hour_visitors = hour_visitors.toMap

          val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map( h =>
          (h, map_hour_visitors.getOrElse(h, 0))
          ).toMap
          // map_visitors_to_hours: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(
          // 0 -> 0, 5 -> 0, 10 -> 100, 14 -> 0, 20 -> 0, 1 -> 0, 6 -> 0, 21 -> 0,
          // 9 -> 0, 13 -> 0, 2 -> 0, 17 -> 0, 22 -> 0, 12 -> 0, 7 -> 0, 3 -> 0,
          // 18 -> 0, 16 -> 200, 11 -> 25, 23 -> 0, 8 -> 0, 19 -> 0, 4 -> 0, 15 -> 0
          // )





          share|improve this answer























          • This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
            – user3674993
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:34






          • 1




            @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
            – Leo C
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:54
















          3














          One approach would be to make hour_visitors a Map and use getOrElse to fetch values for the hours in hour_vector as shown below



          val map_hour_visitors = hour_visitors.toMap

          val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map( h =>
          (h, map_hour_visitors.getOrElse(h, 0))
          ).toMap
          // map_visitors_to_hours: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(
          // 0 -> 0, 5 -> 0, 10 -> 100, 14 -> 0, 20 -> 0, 1 -> 0, 6 -> 0, 21 -> 0,
          // 9 -> 0, 13 -> 0, 2 -> 0, 17 -> 0, 22 -> 0, 12 -> 0, 7 -> 0, 3 -> 0,
          // 18 -> 0, 16 -> 200, 11 -> 25, 23 -> 0, 8 -> 0, 19 -> 0, 4 -> 0, 15 -> 0
          // )





          share|improve this answer























          • This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
            – user3674993
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:34






          • 1




            @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
            – Leo C
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:54














          3












          3








          3






          One approach would be to make hour_visitors a Map and use getOrElse to fetch values for the hours in hour_vector as shown below



          val map_hour_visitors = hour_visitors.toMap

          val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map( h =>
          (h, map_hour_visitors.getOrElse(h, 0))
          ).toMap
          // map_visitors_to_hours: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(
          // 0 -> 0, 5 -> 0, 10 -> 100, 14 -> 0, 20 -> 0, 1 -> 0, 6 -> 0, 21 -> 0,
          // 9 -> 0, 13 -> 0, 2 -> 0, 17 -> 0, 22 -> 0, 12 -> 0, 7 -> 0, 3 -> 0,
          // 18 -> 0, 16 -> 200, 11 -> 25, 23 -> 0, 8 -> 0, 19 -> 0, 4 -> 0, 15 -> 0
          // )





          share|improve this answer














          One approach would be to make hour_visitors a Map and use getOrElse to fetch values for the hours in hour_vector as shown below



          val map_hour_visitors = hour_visitors.toMap

          val map_visitors_to_hours = hour_vector.map( h =>
          (h, map_hour_visitors.getOrElse(h, 0))
          ).toMap
          // map_visitors_to_hours: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(
          // 0 -> 0, 5 -> 0, 10 -> 100, 14 -> 0, 20 -> 0, 1 -> 0, 6 -> 0, 21 -> 0,
          // 9 -> 0, 13 -> 0, 2 -> 0, 17 -> 0, 22 -> 0, 12 -> 0, 7 -> 0, 3 -> 0,
          // 18 -> 0, 16 -> 200, 11 -> 25, 23 -> 0, 8 -> 0, 19 -> 0, 4 -> 0, 15 -> 0
          // )






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 28 '18 at 3:26

























          answered Dec 28 '18 at 3:20









          Leo C

          10.3k2617




          10.3k2617












          • This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
            – user3674993
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:34






          • 1




            @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
            – Leo C
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:54


















          • This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
            – user3674993
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:34






          • 1




            @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
            – Leo C
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:54
















          This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
          – user3674993
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:34




          This is it! I can follow the logic but working this out on myself would be quite difficult, just seems like so many toMap calls to get something so trivial to work properly (perhaps it isnt as trivial as I think it is)
          – user3674993
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:34




          1




          1




          @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
          – Leo C
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:54




          @user3674993, from performance point of view, I'd say the first toMap is well worth it as you get O(1) in Map lookup. As to the other toMap, it can be skipped if your data specs allow the result to be in Vector[(Int, Int)].
          – Leo C
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:54


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53953207%2fmapping-key-values-between-different-size-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mossoró

          Error while reading .h5 file using the rhdf5 package in R

          Pushsharp Apns notification error: 'InvalidToken'