Is JavaScript clearInterval asynchronous?
I have the code below.
var intervalId;
function myCallback() {
$.ajax({
url: "http://bla.html",
cache: false,
success: function(data) {
if (intervalId) {
clearInterval(intervalId);
}
if (data && data.result) {
return;
}
alert(data.result);
}
, timout: 2000
});
}
function callInterval() {
intervalId = setInterval(myCallback, 5000);
}
callInterval();
The problem is that the "clearInterval(intervalId)" doesn't seems to invalidate the interval at this right time because the message alert is shown twice.
So here is my question, is clearInterval(intervalId) asynchronous?
javascript asynchronous synchronization
add a comment |
I have the code below.
var intervalId;
function myCallback() {
$.ajax({
url: "http://bla.html",
cache: false,
success: function(data) {
if (intervalId) {
clearInterval(intervalId);
}
if (data && data.result) {
return;
}
alert(data.result);
}
, timout: 2000
});
}
function callInterval() {
intervalId = setInterval(myCallback, 5000);
}
callInterval();
The problem is that the "clearInterval(intervalId)" doesn't seems to invalidate the interval at this right time because the message alert is shown twice.
So here is my question, is clearInterval(intervalId) asynchronous?
javascript asynchronous synchronization
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you usingsetTimeout?
– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
Actually, I'm usingsetTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
I have the code below.
var intervalId;
function myCallback() {
$.ajax({
url: "http://bla.html",
cache: false,
success: function(data) {
if (intervalId) {
clearInterval(intervalId);
}
if (data && data.result) {
return;
}
alert(data.result);
}
, timout: 2000
});
}
function callInterval() {
intervalId = setInterval(myCallback, 5000);
}
callInterval();
The problem is that the "clearInterval(intervalId)" doesn't seems to invalidate the interval at this right time because the message alert is shown twice.
So here is my question, is clearInterval(intervalId) asynchronous?
javascript asynchronous synchronization
I have the code below.
var intervalId;
function myCallback() {
$.ajax({
url: "http://bla.html",
cache: false,
success: function(data) {
if (intervalId) {
clearInterval(intervalId);
}
if (data && data.result) {
return;
}
alert(data.result);
}
, timout: 2000
});
}
function callInterval() {
intervalId = setInterval(myCallback, 5000);
}
callInterval();
The problem is that the "clearInterval(intervalId)" doesn't seems to invalidate the interval at this right time because the message alert is shown twice.
So here is my question, is clearInterval(intervalId) asynchronous?
javascript asynchronous synchronization
javascript asynchronous synchronization
edited Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:25
Rhuan Karlus
503622
503622
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you usingsetTimeout?
– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
Actually, I'm usingsetTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you usingsetTimeout?
– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
Actually, I'm usingsetTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you using
setTimeout?– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you using
setTimeout?– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
Actually, I'm using
setTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
Actually, I'm using
setTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The point is not about being the clearInterval sync or async.
In your code you start the interval the first time, and then after every second you execute your myCallback.
Clearing the interval when you get back a response, means that during the time that the ajax request is performing, the interval is still running and will start new ajax requests.
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage theclearInterval
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53948002%2fis-javascript-clearinterval-asynchronous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The point is not about being the clearInterval sync or async.
In your code you start the interval the first time, and then after every second you execute your myCallback.
Clearing the interval when you get back a response, means that during the time that the ajax request is performing, the interval is still running and will start new ajax requests.
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage theclearInterval
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
add a comment |
The point is not about being the clearInterval sync or async.
In your code you start the interval the first time, and then after every second you execute your myCallback.
Clearing the interval when you get back a response, means that during the time that the ajax request is performing, the interval is still running and will start new ajax requests.
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage theclearInterval
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
add a comment |
The point is not about being the clearInterval sync or async.
In your code you start the interval the first time, and then after every second you execute your myCallback.
Clearing the interval when you get back a response, means that during the time that the ajax request is performing, the interval is still running and will start new ajax requests.
The point is not about being the clearInterval sync or async.
In your code you start the interval the first time, and then after every second you execute your myCallback.
Clearing the interval when you get back a response, means that during the time that the ajax request is performing, the interval is still running and will start new ajax requests.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 16:44
quirimmo
5,49911129
5,49911129
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage theclearInterval
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
add a comment |
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage theclearInterval
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
Your answer is concise, but the alert is shown multiple times. I've used "twice" but it is shown as many time as my browser keeps open.
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 17:00
as I said above, it depends on how you manage the
clearInterval– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
as I said above, it depends on how you manage the
clearInterval– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 17:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53948002%2fis-javascript-clearinterval-asynchronous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The AJAX request is probably taking more than a second. Why aren't you using
setTimeout?– SLaks
Dec 27 '18 at 16:26
Actually, I'm using
setTimeout. I didn't put it in the question. My interval executes every 5 seconds, and I've used a timeout of 2 seconds.– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:35
What are you trying to do? I mean, what is the goal? it doesn't really make much sense to use an interval to repeat an http call. I guess the goal is to execute an http call every X seconds, as long as one is not running already, but this code doesn't really serve this purpose.
– briosheje
Dec 27 '18 at 16:36
the message is shown twice because you clear the interval when you get the response not when you start the request. This means that during the latency since the first response, the interval is still starting ajax requests
– quirimmo
Dec 27 '18 at 16:37
Sorry guys, I've edited the code. Now you can help me?
– Rhuan Karlus
Dec 27 '18 at 16:39