Why can't I use Jinja in Javascript for a django site?
So for those of us who use Python and Django framework to develop a website, there is this awesome tool known as jinja which can be used as a template engine. For example:
Instead of hard-coding an import like this:
<script src="assets/js/onebutton.js"></script>
We can do this:
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
But why isn't it possible to use jinja template in Javascript.
For example:
homepage.html
<script src='whatever.js'></script>
<p>Another example</p>
<button id="clickme"> click me </button>
whatever.js
$(function()
{
$('#clickme').click(function(){
$.ajax({
headers : {'X-CSRFToken': getCookie('csrftoken')},
type: "POST",
url: '{% url "func" %}', //<--Problem arise here
datatype:"json",
data: {},
success: function(data){
var new_template = '<h1> %firstmsg% </h1>';
var new_frontend = new_template.replace('%firstmsg%',data.message);
console.log(new_frontend);
document.getElementById('wor').innerHTML+=new_frontend;
}
});
}
}
Django would recognize the url in the AJAX request as /'{% url "func" %}'
instead of /func
The only way to solve this is to move the entire code from whatever.js
into the homepage.html
in a <script></script>
block.
Perhaps we need to import something for Jinja templating to work?
javascript python django frontend jinja2
add a comment |
So for those of us who use Python and Django framework to develop a website, there is this awesome tool known as jinja which can be used as a template engine. For example:
Instead of hard-coding an import like this:
<script src="assets/js/onebutton.js"></script>
We can do this:
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
But why isn't it possible to use jinja template in Javascript.
For example:
homepage.html
<script src='whatever.js'></script>
<p>Another example</p>
<button id="clickme"> click me </button>
whatever.js
$(function()
{
$('#clickme').click(function(){
$.ajax({
headers : {'X-CSRFToken': getCookie('csrftoken')},
type: "POST",
url: '{% url "func" %}', //<--Problem arise here
datatype:"json",
data: {},
success: function(data){
var new_template = '<h1> %firstmsg% </h1>';
var new_frontend = new_template.replace('%firstmsg%',data.message);
console.log(new_frontend);
document.getElementById('wor').innerHTML+=new_frontend;
}
});
}
}
Django would recognize the url in the AJAX request as /'{% url "func" %}'
instead of /func
The only way to solve this is to move the entire code from whatever.js
into the homepage.html
in a <script></script>
block.
Perhaps we need to import something for Jinja templating to work?
javascript python django frontend jinja2
add a comment |
So for those of us who use Python and Django framework to develop a website, there is this awesome tool known as jinja which can be used as a template engine. For example:
Instead of hard-coding an import like this:
<script src="assets/js/onebutton.js"></script>
We can do this:
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
But why isn't it possible to use jinja template in Javascript.
For example:
homepage.html
<script src='whatever.js'></script>
<p>Another example</p>
<button id="clickme"> click me </button>
whatever.js
$(function()
{
$('#clickme').click(function(){
$.ajax({
headers : {'X-CSRFToken': getCookie('csrftoken')},
type: "POST",
url: '{% url "func" %}', //<--Problem arise here
datatype:"json",
data: {},
success: function(data){
var new_template = '<h1> %firstmsg% </h1>';
var new_frontend = new_template.replace('%firstmsg%',data.message);
console.log(new_frontend);
document.getElementById('wor').innerHTML+=new_frontend;
}
});
}
}
Django would recognize the url in the AJAX request as /'{% url "func" %}'
instead of /func
The only way to solve this is to move the entire code from whatever.js
into the homepage.html
in a <script></script>
block.
Perhaps we need to import something for Jinja templating to work?
javascript python django frontend jinja2
So for those of us who use Python and Django framework to develop a website, there is this awesome tool known as jinja which can be used as a template engine. For example:
Instead of hard-coding an import like this:
<script src="assets/js/onebutton.js"></script>
We can do this:
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
But why isn't it possible to use jinja template in Javascript.
For example:
homepage.html
<script src='whatever.js'></script>
<p>Another example</p>
<button id="clickme"> click me </button>
whatever.js
$(function()
{
$('#clickme').click(function(){
$.ajax({
headers : {'X-CSRFToken': getCookie('csrftoken')},
type: "POST",
url: '{% url "func" %}', //<--Problem arise here
datatype:"json",
data: {},
success: function(data){
var new_template = '<h1> %firstmsg% </h1>';
var new_frontend = new_template.replace('%firstmsg%',data.message);
console.log(new_frontend);
document.getElementById('wor').innerHTML+=new_frontend;
}
});
}
}
Django would recognize the url in the AJAX request as /'{% url "func" %}'
instead of /func
The only way to solve this is to move the entire code from whatever.js
into the homepage.html
in a <script></script>
block.
Perhaps we need to import something for Jinja templating to work?
javascript python django frontend jinja2
javascript python django frontend jinja2
edited Dec 30 '18 at 19:44
5Volts
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:25
5Volts5Volts
7219
7219
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
This is inaccurate. All it does is it converts the given path to the static path provided in your settings file like this - /static/asssets/js/onebutton.js
. That is it. Django or Jinja2 doesn't go through the folder and look for the file. It doesn't even care if file exists or not.
Later, the browser automatically fetches this file from the server when it receives the html document.
Coming back to your original questions about why you can't use Jinja2 or Django template syntax in your JS files. Well, you can. But you'll have to render your JS files from your views.
Now, I'm sure you're using the render
function to return a template from your views. But what does it do?
The render
function converts the django specific template tags into proper html content.
So, if you're using django's or jinja's template syntax in your js files, you'll have to render your js files too. But that seems like a bad idea. Instead, you can create some global variables in your html files, and use them in your js files.
<!-- define required variables in template -->
<script>
var URL = '{% url ... %}';
var OTHER_VARIABLE = '{{ other_variable }}';
</script>
<!-- include your js files -->
<script src="/path/to/file.js"></script>
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53979824%2fwhy-cant-i-use-jinja-in-javascript-for-a-django-site%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
This is inaccurate. All it does is it converts the given path to the static path provided in your settings file like this - /static/asssets/js/onebutton.js
. That is it. Django or Jinja2 doesn't go through the folder and look for the file. It doesn't even care if file exists or not.
Later, the browser automatically fetches this file from the server when it receives the html document.
Coming back to your original questions about why you can't use Jinja2 or Django template syntax in your JS files. Well, you can. But you'll have to render your JS files from your views.
Now, I'm sure you're using the render
function to return a template from your views. But what does it do?
The render
function converts the django specific template tags into proper html content.
So, if you're using django's or jinja's template syntax in your js files, you'll have to render your js files too. But that seems like a bad idea. Instead, you can create some global variables in your html files, and use them in your js files.
<!-- define required variables in template -->
<script>
var URL = '{% url ... %}';
var OTHER_VARIABLE = '{{ other_variable }}';
</script>
<!-- include your js files -->
<script src="/path/to/file.js"></script>
add a comment |
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
This is inaccurate. All it does is it converts the given path to the static path provided in your settings file like this - /static/asssets/js/onebutton.js
. That is it. Django or Jinja2 doesn't go through the folder and look for the file. It doesn't even care if file exists or not.
Later, the browser automatically fetches this file from the server when it receives the html document.
Coming back to your original questions about why you can't use Jinja2 or Django template syntax in your JS files. Well, you can. But you'll have to render your JS files from your views.
Now, I'm sure you're using the render
function to return a template from your views. But what does it do?
The render
function converts the django specific template tags into proper html content.
So, if you're using django's or jinja's template syntax in your js files, you'll have to render your js files too. But that seems like a bad idea. Instead, you can create some global variables in your html files, and use them in your js files.
<!-- define required variables in template -->
<script>
var URL = '{% url ... %}';
var OTHER_VARIABLE = '{{ other_variable }}';
</script>
<!-- include your js files -->
<script src="/path/to/file.js"></script>
add a comment |
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
This is inaccurate. All it does is it converts the given path to the static path provided in your settings file like this - /static/asssets/js/onebutton.js
. That is it. Django or Jinja2 doesn't go through the folder and look for the file. It doesn't even care if file exists or not.
Later, the browser automatically fetches this file from the server when it receives the html document.
Coming back to your original questions about why you can't use Jinja2 or Django template syntax in your JS files. Well, you can. But you'll have to render your JS files from your views.
Now, I'm sure you're using the render
function to return a template from your views. But what does it do?
The render
function converts the django specific template tags into proper html content.
So, if you're using django's or jinja's template syntax in your js files, you'll have to render your js files too. But that seems like a bad idea. Instead, you can create some global variables in your html files, and use them in your js files.
<!-- define required variables in template -->
<script>
var URL = '{% url ... %}';
var OTHER_VARIABLE = '{{ other_variable }}';
</script>
<!-- include your js files -->
<script src="/path/to/file.js"></script>
<script src="{% static 'assets/js/onebutton.js' %}"></script>
In this case, it automatically searches for a folder named static and goes inside to look for the needed code.
This is inaccurate. All it does is it converts the given path to the static path provided in your settings file like this - /static/asssets/js/onebutton.js
. That is it. Django or Jinja2 doesn't go through the folder and look for the file. It doesn't even care if file exists or not.
Later, the browser automatically fetches this file from the server when it receives the html document.
Coming back to your original questions about why you can't use Jinja2 or Django template syntax in your JS files. Well, you can. But you'll have to render your JS files from your views.
Now, I'm sure you're using the render
function to return a template from your views. But what does it do?
The render
function converts the django specific template tags into proper html content.
So, if you're using django's or jinja's template syntax in your js files, you'll have to render your js files too. But that seems like a bad idea. Instead, you can create some global variables in your html files, and use them in your js files.
<!-- define required variables in template -->
<script>
var URL = '{% url ... %}';
var OTHER_VARIABLE = '{{ other_variable }}';
</script>
<!-- include your js files -->
<script src="/path/to/file.js"></script>
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:06
xyresxyres
9,58232345
9,58232345
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53979824%2fwhy-cant-i-use-jinja-in-javascript-for-a-django-site%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown