Oracle TOP N ordered rows
I would like to get the top N rows from an Oracle table sorted by date.
The common way to do this, and this solution returns for every question I could find on SO/google.
Select *
from
(select * from
myTable
ordered by Date desc)
where rownum < N
This solution is in my case impracticable because myTable contains an huge ammount of rows which would
lead to Oracle taking too long to return all rows in the subquery.
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows returned in the subquery ?
sql oracle
add a comment |
I would like to get the top N rows from an Oracle table sorted by date.
The common way to do this, and this solution returns for every question I could find on SO/google.
Select *
from
(select * from
myTable
ordered by Date desc)
where rownum < N
This solution is in my case impracticable because myTable contains an huge ammount of rows which would
lead to Oracle taking too long to return all rows in the subquery.
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows returned in the subquery ?
sql oracle
add a comment |
I would like to get the top N rows from an Oracle table sorted by date.
The common way to do this, and this solution returns for every question I could find on SO/google.
Select *
from
(select * from
myTable
ordered by Date desc)
where rownum < N
This solution is in my case impracticable because myTable contains an huge ammount of rows which would
lead to Oracle taking too long to return all rows in the subquery.
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows returned in the subquery ?
sql oracle
I would like to get the top N rows from an Oracle table sorted by date.
The common way to do this, and this solution returns for every question I could find on SO/google.
Select *
from
(select * from
myTable
ordered by Date desc)
where rownum < N
This solution is in my case impracticable because myTable contains an huge ammount of rows which would
lead to Oracle taking too long to return all rows in the subquery.
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows returned in the subquery ?
sql oracle
sql oracle
asked Jul 28 '11 at 11:40
Oysio
1,68463451
1,68463451
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Your inference that Oracle must return all rows in the subquery before filtering out the first N is wrong. It will start fetching rows from the subquery, and stop when it has returned N rows.
Having said that, it may be that Oracle needs to select all rows from the table and sort them before it can start returning them. But if there were an index on the column being used in the ORDER BY clause, it might not.
Oracle is in the same position as any other DBMS: if you have a large table with no index on the column you are ordering by, how can it possibly know which rows are the top N without first getting all the rows and sorting them?
add a comment |
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows
returned in the subquery ?
The following is what I typically use for top-n type queries (pagination query in this case):
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select *
from your_table
where ...
order by ...
) a
where rownum <= :upperBound
)
where r >= :lowerBound;
I usually use an indexed column to sort in inner query, and the use of rownum means Oracle can use the count(stopkey) optimization. So, not necessarily going to do full table scan:
create table t3 as select * from all_objects;
alter table t3 add constraint t_pk primary key(object_id);
analyze table t3 compute statistics;
delete from plan_table;
commit;
explain plan for
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select object_id, object_name
from t3
order by object_id
) a
where rownum <= 2000
)
where r >= 1;
select operation, options, object_name, id, parent_id, position, cost, cardinality, other_tag, optimizer
from plan_table
order by id;
You'll find Oracle does a full index scan using t_pk. Also note the use of stopkey option.
Hope that explains my answer ;)
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
add a comment |
Order by may become heavy operation if you have lots of data. Take a look at your execution plan. If the data is not real time you could create a material view on these kind of selects...
add a comment |
In older versions of ORACLE (8.0) you don't have the possibility to use ORDER BY clause in subquery.
So, only for those of us who yet use some ancient versions, there is another way to deal with: The magic of UNION operator.
UNION will sort the records by columns in the query:
Example:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5
where 99999999999 is bigger then all values in EMP_NO;
Or, if you want to select TOP 5 salary employees with the highest 5 salaries:
SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME, 99999999999999-TMP_EMP_SAL
FROM
(SELECT 99999999999999-EMP_SAL TMP_EMP_SAL, EMP_NO, EMP_NAME
FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999999,0,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5;
Regards,
Virgil Ionescu
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f6858325%2foracle-top-n-ordered-rows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your inference that Oracle must return all rows in the subquery before filtering out the first N is wrong. It will start fetching rows from the subquery, and stop when it has returned N rows.
Having said that, it may be that Oracle needs to select all rows from the table and sort them before it can start returning them. But if there were an index on the column being used in the ORDER BY clause, it might not.
Oracle is in the same position as any other DBMS: if you have a large table with no index on the column you are ordering by, how can it possibly know which rows are the top N without first getting all the rows and sorting them?
add a comment |
Your inference that Oracle must return all rows in the subquery before filtering out the first N is wrong. It will start fetching rows from the subquery, and stop when it has returned N rows.
Having said that, it may be that Oracle needs to select all rows from the table and sort them before it can start returning them. But if there were an index on the column being used in the ORDER BY clause, it might not.
Oracle is in the same position as any other DBMS: if you have a large table with no index on the column you are ordering by, how can it possibly know which rows are the top N without first getting all the rows and sorting them?
add a comment |
Your inference that Oracle must return all rows in the subquery before filtering out the first N is wrong. It will start fetching rows from the subquery, and stop when it has returned N rows.
Having said that, it may be that Oracle needs to select all rows from the table and sort them before it can start returning them. But if there were an index on the column being used in the ORDER BY clause, it might not.
Oracle is in the same position as any other DBMS: if you have a large table with no index on the column you are ordering by, how can it possibly know which rows are the top N without first getting all the rows and sorting them?
Your inference that Oracle must return all rows in the subquery before filtering out the first N is wrong. It will start fetching rows from the subquery, and stop when it has returned N rows.
Having said that, it may be that Oracle needs to select all rows from the table and sort them before it can start returning them. But if there were an index on the column being used in the ORDER BY clause, it might not.
Oracle is in the same position as any other DBMS: if you have a large table with no index on the column you are ordering by, how can it possibly know which rows are the top N without first getting all the rows and sorting them?
edited Jul 28 '11 at 13:00
answered Jul 28 '11 at 11:43
Tony Andrews
107k17189233
107k17189233
add a comment |
add a comment |
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows
returned in the subquery ?
The following is what I typically use for top-n type queries (pagination query in this case):
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select *
from your_table
where ...
order by ...
) a
where rownum <= :upperBound
)
where r >= :lowerBound;
I usually use an indexed column to sort in inner query, and the use of rownum means Oracle can use the count(stopkey) optimization. So, not necessarily going to do full table scan:
create table t3 as select * from all_objects;
alter table t3 add constraint t_pk primary key(object_id);
analyze table t3 compute statistics;
delete from plan_table;
commit;
explain plan for
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select object_id, object_name
from t3
order by object_id
) a
where rownum <= 2000
)
where r >= 1;
select operation, options, object_name, id, parent_id, position, cost, cardinality, other_tag, optimizer
from plan_table
order by id;
You'll find Oracle does a full index scan using t_pk. Also note the use of stopkey option.
Hope that explains my answer ;)
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
add a comment |
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows
returned in the subquery ?
The following is what I typically use for top-n type queries (pagination query in this case):
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select *
from your_table
where ...
order by ...
) a
where rownum <= :upperBound
)
where r >= :lowerBound;
I usually use an indexed column to sort in inner query, and the use of rownum means Oracle can use the count(stopkey) optimization. So, not necessarily going to do full table scan:
create table t3 as select * from all_objects;
alter table t3 add constraint t_pk primary key(object_id);
analyze table t3 compute statistics;
delete from plan_table;
commit;
explain plan for
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select object_id, object_name
from t3
order by object_id
) a
where rownum <= 2000
)
where r >= 1;
select operation, options, object_name, id, parent_id, position, cost, cardinality, other_tag, optimizer
from plan_table
order by id;
You'll find Oracle does a full index scan using t_pk. Also note the use of stopkey option.
Hope that explains my answer ;)
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
add a comment |
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows
returned in the subquery ?
The following is what I typically use for top-n type queries (pagination query in this case):
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select *
from your_table
where ...
order by ...
) a
where rownum <= :upperBound
)
where r >= :lowerBound;
I usually use an indexed column to sort in inner query, and the use of rownum means Oracle can use the count(stopkey) optimization. So, not necessarily going to do full table scan:
create table t3 as select * from all_objects;
alter table t3 add constraint t_pk primary key(object_id);
analyze table t3 compute statistics;
delete from plan_table;
commit;
explain plan for
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select object_id, object_name
from t3
order by object_id
) a
where rownum <= 2000
)
where r >= 1;
select operation, options, object_name, id, parent_id, position, cost, cardinality, other_tag, optimizer
from plan_table
order by id;
You'll find Oracle does a full index scan using t_pk. Also note the use of stopkey option.
Hope that explains my answer ;)
Question is, is there a way to limit the number of ORDERED rows
returned in the subquery ?
The following is what I typically use for top-n type queries (pagination query in this case):
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select *
from your_table
where ...
order by ...
) a
where rownum <= :upperBound
)
where r >= :lowerBound;
I usually use an indexed column to sort in inner query, and the use of rownum means Oracle can use the count(stopkey) optimization. So, not necessarily going to do full table scan:
create table t3 as select * from all_objects;
alter table t3 add constraint t_pk primary key(object_id);
analyze table t3 compute statistics;
delete from plan_table;
commit;
explain plan for
select * from (
select a.*, rownum r
from (
select object_id, object_name
from t3
order by object_id
) a
where rownum <= 2000
)
where r >= 1;
select operation, options, object_name, id, parent_id, position, cost, cardinality, other_tag, optimizer
from plan_table
order by id;
You'll find Oracle does a full index scan using t_pk. Also note the use of stopkey option.
Hope that explains my answer ;)
edited Jul 28 '11 at 17:49
answered Jul 28 '11 at 14:37
tbone
11.9k12436
11.9k12436
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
add a comment |
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
1
1
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
You should explain why you think this is a suitable answer to the question.
– Allan
Jul 28 '11 at 14:59
add a comment |
Order by may become heavy operation if you have lots of data. Take a look at your execution plan. If the data is not real time you could create a material view on these kind of selects...
add a comment |
Order by may become heavy operation if you have lots of data. Take a look at your execution plan. If the data is not real time you could create a material view on these kind of selects...
add a comment |
Order by may become heavy operation if you have lots of data. Take a look at your execution plan. If the data is not real time you could create a material view on these kind of selects...
Order by may become heavy operation if you have lots of data. Take a look at your execution plan. If the data is not real time you could create a material view on these kind of selects...
answered Jul 28 '11 at 11:51
Dmitry Alexandrov
325114
325114
add a comment |
add a comment |
In older versions of ORACLE (8.0) you don't have the possibility to use ORDER BY clause in subquery.
So, only for those of us who yet use some ancient versions, there is another way to deal with: The magic of UNION operator.
UNION will sort the records by columns in the query:
Example:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5
where 99999999999 is bigger then all values in EMP_NO;
Or, if you want to select TOP 5 salary employees with the highest 5 salaries:
SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME, 99999999999999-TMP_EMP_SAL
FROM
(SELECT 99999999999999-EMP_SAL TMP_EMP_SAL, EMP_NO, EMP_NAME
FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999999,0,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5;
Regards,
Virgil Ionescu
add a comment |
In older versions of ORACLE (8.0) you don't have the possibility to use ORDER BY clause in subquery.
So, only for those of us who yet use some ancient versions, there is another way to deal with: The magic of UNION operator.
UNION will sort the records by columns in the query:
Example:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5
where 99999999999 is bigger then all values in EMP_NO;
Or, if you want to select TOP 5 salary employees with the highest 5 salaries:
SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME, 99999999999999-TMP_EMP_SAL
FROM
(SELECT 99999999999999-EMP_SAL TMP_EMP_SAL, EMP_NO, EMP_NAME
FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999999,0,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5;
Regards,
Virgil Ionescu
add a comment |
In older versions of ORACLE (8.0) you don't have the possibility to use ORDER BY clause in subquery.
So, only for those of us who yet use some ancient versions, there is another way to deal with: The magic of UNION operator.
UNION will sort the records by columns in the query:
Example:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5
where 99999999999 is bigger then all values in EMP_NO;
Or, if you want to select TOP 5 salary employees with the highest 5 salaries:
SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME, 99999999999999-TMP_EMP_SAL
FROM
(SELECT 99999999999999-EMP_SAL TMP_EMP_SAL, EMP_NO, EMP_NAME
FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999999,0,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5;
Regards,
Virgil Ionescu
In older versions of ORACLE (8.0) you don't have the possibility to use ORDER BY clause in subquery.
So, only for those of us who yet use some ancient versions, there is another way to deal with: The magic of UNION operator.
UNION will sort the records by columns in the query:
Example:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5
where 99999999999 is bigger then all values in EMP_NO;
Or, if you want to select TOP 5 salary employees with the highest 5 salaries:
SELECT EMP_NO, EMP_NAME, 99999999999999-TMP_EMP_SAL
FROM
(SELECT 99999999999999-EMP_SAL TMP_EMP_SAL, EMP_NO, EMP_NAME
FROM EMP_TABLE
UNION
SELECT 99999999999999,0,'' FROM DUAL)
WHERE ROWNUM<=5;
Regards,
Virgil Ionescu
edited Dec 27 '18 at 21:29
ltd9938
9451822
9451822
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:15
user10840231
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f6858325%2foracle-top-n-ordered-rows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown