Using immutability-helper, how to set the property of an instance of a class without cloning other fields?
Here is an example:
class ExampleClass {
private x: number;
private ary: number;
constructor(x, ary = ) {
this.x = x;
this.ary = ary;
}
public getX() {
return this.x;
}
public setX(x) {
this.x = x;
}
}
const elemArray = [new ExampleClass(10, [10, 20]), new ExampleClass(20, [20, 30])];
I want to set the elemArray's second element's x to 30 using the setX function. The simplest way would be:
const newElemArray = update(elemArray, {1: {$apply: function (x: ExampleClass) {
const y = _.cloneDeep(x);
y.setX(30);
return y;
}}});
But I want to be able to do this without cloning the array ary, since that can itself be large and cloning maybe costly. How can I do this?
Thanks
javascript reactjs typescript redux immutability-helper
add a comment |
Here is an example:
class ExampleClass {
private x: number;
private ary: number;
constructor(x, ary = ) {
this.x = x;
this.ary = ary;
}
public getX() {
return this.x;
}
public setX(x) {
this.x = x;
}
}
const elemArray = [new ExampleClass(10, [10, 20]), new ExampleClass(20, [20, 30])];
I want to set the elemArray's second element's x to 30 using the setX function. The simplest way would be:
const newElemArray = update(elemArray, {1: {$apply: function (x: ExampleClass) {
const y = _.cloneDeep(x);
y.setX(30);
return y;
}}});
But I want to be able to do this without cloning the array ary, since that can itself be large and cloning maybe costly. How can I do this?
Thanks
javascript reactjs typescript redux immutability-helper
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43
add a comment |
Here is an example:
class ExampleClass {
private x: number;
private ary: number;
constructor(x, ary = ) {
this.x = x;
this.ary = ary;
}
public getX() {
return this.x;
}
public setX(x) {
this.x = x;
}
}
const elemArray = [new ExampleClass(10, [10, 20]), new ExampleClass(20, [20, 30])];
I want to set the elemArray's second element's x to 30 using the setX function. The simplest way would be:
const newElemArray = update(elemArray, {1: {$apply: function (x: ExampleClass) {
const y = _.cloneDeep(x);
y.setX(30);
return y;
}}});
But I want to be able to do this without cloning the array ary, since that can itself be large and cloning maybe costly. How can I do this?
Thanks
javascript reactjs typescript redux immutability-helper
Here is an example:
class ExampleClass {
private x: number;
private ary: number;
constructor(x, ary = ) {
this.x = x;
this.ary = ary;
}
public getX() {
return this.x;
}
public setX(x) {
this.x = x;
}
}
const elemArray = [new ExampleClass(10, [10, 20]), new ExampleClass(20, [20, 30])];
I want to set the elemArray's second element's x to 30 using the setX function. The simplest way would be:
const newElemArray = update(elemArray, {1: {$apply: function (x: ExampleClass) {
const y = _.cloneDeep(x);
y.setX(30);
return y;
}}});
But I want to be able to do this without cloning the array ary, since that can itself be large and cloning maybe costly. How can I do this?
Thanks
javascript reactjs typescript redux immutability-helper
javascript reactjs typescript redux immutability-helper
asked Jan 2 at 9:12
Sagar B HathwarSagar B Hathwar
301111
301111
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43
add a comment |
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54003738%2fusing-immutability-helper-how-to-set-the-property-of-an-instance-of-a-class-wit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54003738%2fusing-immutability-helper-how-to-set-the-property-of-an-instance-of-a-class-wit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think the idea behind immutability is that you can’t alter an object from outside it’s own scope. It seems you are jumping through hoops to get around this, but then why are you using an immutability library?
– Kokodoko
Jan 2 at 9:23
I have an array in redux store, an array of instances. Rather than cloning the entire array, I want to be able to change one field of one item of the array. Any simpler suggestion(not using an immutability library, perhaps?) is welcome
– Sagar B Hathwar
Jan 2 at 9:43