Javascript seperating array of objects into multiple arrays using map(), and Iterator
Basically I have an array of objects like
var array = [{x: 10, y: 5, r: 10, ...} ]
There are more fields in the object, but to the point, this is the way I've found to seperate the fields to arrays:
var x = array.map(obj => obj.x);
var y = array.map(obj => obj.y);
// and so on for each field
Works, but seems very inefficient as the number of fields and the array size grows, as this scans the array multiple times. I could use a standard loop, but I do prefer the map() as I think it is more readable in this case.
Is it possible to return multiple values from map?
I think something like:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]); // should output two arrays
Or anything similar which will be readable (reduce is less readable IMO).
- I did notice some newer javascript functions like
array.entries()
which return an iterator object. How can I implement such functions?
javascript arrays array-map
add a comment |
Basically I have an array of objects like
var array = [{x: 10, y: 5, r: 10, ...} ]
There are more fields in the object, but to the point, this is the way I've found to seperate the fields to arrays:
var x = array.map(obj => obj.x);
var y = array.map(obj => obj.y);
// and so on for each field
Works, but seems very inefficient as the number of fields and the array size grows, as this scans the array multiple times. I could use a standard loop, but I do prefer the map() as I think it is more readable in this case.
Is it possible to return multiple values from map?
I think something like:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]); // should output two arrays
Or anything similar which will be readable (reduce is less readable IMO).
- I did notice some newer javascript functions like
array.entries()
which return an iterator object. How can I implement such functions?
javascript arrays array-map
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16
add a comment |
Basically I have an array of objects like
var array = [{x: 10, y: 5, r: 10, ...} ]
There are more fields in the object, but to the point, this is the way I've found to seperate the fields to arrays:
var x = array.map(obj => obj.x);
var y = array.map(obj => obj.y);
// and so on for each field
Works, but seems very inefficient as the number of fields and the array size grows, as this scans the array multiple times. I could use a standard loop, but I do prefer the map() as I think it is more readable in this case.
Is it possible to return multiple values from map?
I think something like:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]); // should output two arrays
Or anything similar which will be readable (reduce is less readable IMO).
- I did notice some newer javascript functions like
array.entries()
which return an iterator object. How can I implement such functions?
javascript arrays array-map
Basically I have an array of objects like
var array = [{x: 10, y: 5, r: 10, ...} ]
There are more fields in the object, but to the point, this is the way I've found to seperate the fields to arrays:
var x = array.map(obj => obj.x);
var y = array.map(obj => obj.y);
// and so on for each field
Works, but seems very inefficient as the number of fields and the array size grows, as this scans the array multiple times. I could use a standard loop, but I do prefer the map() as I think it is more readable in this case.
Is it possible to return multiple values from map?
I think something like:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]); // should output two arrays
Or anything similar which will be readable (reduce is less readable IMO).
- I did notice some newer javascript functions like
array.entries()
which return an iterator object. How can I implement such functions?
javascript arrays array-map
javascript arrays array-map
edited Jan 2 at 21:32
user3599803
asked Jan 2 at 18:06
user3599803user3599803
93831749
93831749
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16
add a comment |
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You could reduce the array and iterate the objects key/value pairs. Then push the values to the array of the given property.
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
add a comment |
So, you were on to the right start with your second attempt:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]);
As you indicate, the first attempt is too inefficient, since you will have to loop through the array multiple times for each field you want to pull out, but you can do everything you want to do using an array's .reduce()
method.
I would do the following:
var [x, y] = array.reduce(
(accum, val) => {
accum[0].push(val.x);
accum[1].push(val.y);
return accum;
},
[ , ]
);
What I'm doing is telling the reducer to initialize the accumulator with an empty array of arrays ([ , ]
), and when it loops through the array, it will put the .x
properties into the first array in the accumulator and the .y
properties into the second array. And thanks to destructuring, x
will be an array of all the .x
properties and y
will be an array of all the .y
properties.
This approach is easy to extend as your fields grow by adding more empty arrays to the initial accumulator object and making sure in the reducer to push those fields into that new object.
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
add a comment |
If all the objects have the same keys, you could get a copy of those keys and cache so you won't need to get them for every object. You can then use those keys to initialize the result object, then loop the array and push the values into the arrays, like so:
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]); // get the keys of the first object (assuming all objects have the same keys)
var result = {}; // the result object (you can use the safe Object.create(null) instead of {})
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = ); // initialize the result object (make an empty array entry for each key in keys)
array.forEach(obj => // for each object in array
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key])) // add the values of this object to their corresponding array from result using keys from the array keys
);
Demo:
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011113%2fjavascript-seperating-array-of-objects-into-multiple-arrays-using-map-and-ite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You could reduce the array and iterate the objects key/value pairs. Then push the values to the array of the given property.
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
add a comment |
You could reduce the array and iterate the objects key/value pairs. Then push the values to the array of the given property.
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
add a comment |
You could reduce the array and iterate the objects key/value pairs. Then push the values to the array of the given property.
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
You could reduce the array and iterate the objects key/value pairs. Then push the values to the array of the given property.
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }],
result = array.reduce((r, o) => {
Object.entries(o).forEach(([k, v]) => (r[k] = r[k] || ).push(v));
return r;
}, Object.create(null));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
answered Jan 2 at 18:11
Nina ScholzNina Scholz
191k15104176
191k15104176
add a comment |
add a comment |
So, you were on to the right start with your second attempt:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]);
As you indicate, the first attempt is too inefficient, since you will have to loop through the array multiple times for each field you want to pull out, but you can do everything you want to do using an array's .reduce()
method.
I would do the following:
var [x, y] = array.reduce(
(accum, val) => {
accum[0].push(val.x);
accum[1].push(val.y);
return accum;
},
[ , ]
);
What I'm doing is telling the reducer to initialize the accumulator with an empty array of arrays ([ , ]
), and when it loops through the array, it will put the .x
properties into the first array in the accumulator and the .y
properties into the second array. And thanks to destructuring, x
will be an array of all the .x
properties and y
will be an array of all the .y
properties.
This approach is easy to extend as your fields grow by adding more empty arrays to the initial accumulator object and making sure in the reducer to push those fields into that new object.
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
add a comment |
So, you were on to the right start with your second attempt:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]);
As you indicate, the first attempt is too inefficient, since you will have to loop through the array multiple times for each field you want to pull out, but you can do everything you want to do using an array's .reduce()
method.
I would do the following:
var [x, y] = array.reduce(
(accum, val) => {
accum[0].push(val.x);
accum[1].push(val.y);
return accum;
},
[ , ]
);
What I'm doing is telling the reducer to initialize the accumulator with an empty array of arrays ([ , ]
), and when it loops through the array, it will put the .x
properties into the first array in the accumulator and the .y
properties into the second array. And thanks to destructuring, x
will be an array of all the .x
properties and y
will be an array of all the .y
properties.
This approach is easy to extend as your fields grow by adding more empty arrays to the initial accumulator object and making sure in the reducer to push those fields into that new object.
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
add a comment |
So, you were on to the right start with your second attempt:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]);
As you indicate, the first attempt is too inefficient, since you will have to loop through the array multiple times for each field you want to pull out, but you can do everything you want to do using an array's .reduce()
method.
I would do the following:
var [x, y] = array.reduce(
(accum, val) => {
accum[0].push(val.x);
accum[1].push(val.y);
return accum;
},
[ , ]
);
What I'm doing is telling the reducer to initialize the accumulator with an empty array of arrays ([ , ]
), and when it loops through the array, it will put the .x
properties into the first array in the accumulator and the .y
properties into the second array. And thanks to destructuring, x
will be an array of all the .x
properties and y
will be an array of all the .y
properties.
This approach is easy to extend as your fields grow by adding more empty arrays to the initial accumulator object and making sure in the reducer to push those fields into that new object.
So, you were on to the right start with your second attempt:
var [x, y] = array.map(obj => [obj.x, obj.y]);
As you indicate, the first attempt is too inefficient, since you will have to loop through the array multiple times for each field you want to pull out, but you can do everything you want to do using an array's .reduce()
method.
I would do the following:
var [x, y] = array.reduce(
(accum, val) => {
accum[0].push(val.x);
accum[1].push(val.y);
return accum;
},
[ , ]
);
What I'm doing is telling the reducer to initialize the accumulator with an empty array of arrays ([ , ]
), and when it loops through the array, it will put the .x
properties into the first array in the accumulator and the .y
properties into the second array. And thanks to destructuring, x
will be an array of all the .x
properties and y
will be an array of all the .y
properties.
This approach is easy to extend as your fields grow by adding more empty arrays to the initial accumulator object and making sure in the reducer to push those fields into that new object.
answered Jan 2 at 18:27
Ryan DablerRyan Dabler
17117
17117
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
add a comment |
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
How to make it generic? i.e not just for two properties
– user3599803
Jan 2 at 21:33
add a comment |
If all the objects have the same keys, you could get a copy of those keys and cache so you won't need to get them for every object. You can then use those keys to initialize the result object, then loop the array and push the values into the arrays, like so:
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]); // get the keys of the first object (assuming all objects have the same keys)
var result = {}; // the result object (you can use the safe Object.create(null) instead of {})
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = ); // initialize the result object (make an empty array entry for each key in keys)
array.forEach(obj => // for each object in array
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key])) // add the values of this object to their corresponding array from result using keys from the array keys
);
Demo:
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
add a comment |
If all the objects have the same keys, you could get a copy of those keys and cache so you won't need to get them for every object. You can then use those keys to initialize the result object, then loop the array and push the values into the arrays, like so:
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]); // get the keys of the first object (assuming all objects have the same keys)
var result = {}; // the result object (you can use the safe Object.create(null) instead of {})
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = ); // initialize the result object (make an empty array entry for each key in keys)
array.forEach(obj => // for each object in array
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key])) // add the values of this object to their corresponding array from result using keys from the array keys
);
Demo:
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
add a comment |
If all the objects have the same keys, you could get a copy of those keys and cache so you won't need to get them for every object. You can then use those keys to initialize the result object, then loop the array and push the values into the arrays, like so:
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]); // get the keys of the first object (assuming all objects have the same keys)
var result = {}; // the result object (you can use the safe Object.create(null) instead of {})
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = ); // initialize the result object (make an empty array entry for each key in keys)
array.forEach(obj => // for each object in array
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key])) // add the values of this object to their corresponding array from result using keys from the array keys
);
Demo:
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
If all the objects have the same keys, you could get a copy of those keys and cache so you won't need to get them for every object. You can then use those keys to initialize the result object, then loop the array and push the values into the arrays, like so:
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]); // get the keys of the first object (assuming all objects have the same keys)
var result = {}; // the result object (you can use the safe Object.create(null) instead of {})
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = ); // initialize the result object (make an empty array entry for each key in keys)
array.forEach(obj => // for each object in array
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key])) // add the values of this object to their corresponding array from result using keys from the array keys
);
Demo:
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
var array = [{ x: 10, y: 5, r: 10 }, { x: 11, y: 6, r: 11 }];
var keys = Object.keys(array[0]);
var result = {};
keys.forEach(key => result[key] = );
array.forEach(obj =>
keys.forEach(key => result[key].push(obj[key]))
);
console.log(result);
answered Jan 2 at 18:27
ibrahim mahriribrahim mahrir
22.2k41951
22.2k41951
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011113%2fjavascript-seperating-array-of-objects-into-multiple-arrays-using-map-and-ite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do all the objects contain the same keys?
– ibrahim mahrir
Jan 2 at 18:16