Training loss is available but val_loss = nan
0
I am trying to apply batch normalization on an U-net and I have the following architecture:
inputs = Input((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS))
s = Lambda(lambda x: x / 255) (inputs)
width = 32
activation = 'sigmoid'
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (s)
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c1)
c1 = BatchNormalization()(c1)
p1 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c1)
#p1 = Dropout(0.2)(p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c2)
c2 = BatchNormalization()(c2)
p2 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c2)
#p2 = Dropout(0.2)(p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c3)
c3 = BatchNormalization()(c3)
p3 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c3)
#p3 = Dropout(0.2)(p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c4)
c4 = BatchNormalization()(c4)
p4 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)) (c4)
#p4 = Dropout(0.2)(p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c5)
u6 = Conv2DTranspose(width*8, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c5)
u6 = concatenate([u6, c4])
#u6 = Dropout(0.2)(u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c6)
u7 = Conv2DTranspose(width*4, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c6)
u7 = concatenate([u7, c3])
#u7 = Dropout(0.2)(u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c7)
u8 = Conv2DTranspose(width*2, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c7)
u8 = concatenate([u8, c2])
#u8 = Dropout(0.2)(u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c8)
u9 = Conv2DTranspose(width, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c8)
u9 = concatenate([u9, c1], axis=3)
#u9 = Dropout(0.2)(u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c9)
outputs = Conv2D(num_classes, (1, 1), activation=activation) (c9)
model = Model(inputs=[inputs], outputs=[outputs])
What happens is the training loss very quickly approaches a plateau value (within 2 epochs) and the whole time val loss remains nan. I looked at other posts and some say it's because the dimension ordering is wrong. But if this were true, then i shouldn't be getting training loss either. Other reasons are that the value is diminishing due to learning rate. However, this reason too is offset by the fact that I am getting a loss for the training. What am I doing wrong?
keras neural-network
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
add a comment |
0
I am trying to apply batch normalization on an U-net and I have the following architecture:
inputs = Input((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS))
s = Lambda(lambda x: x / 255) (inputs)
width = 32
activation = 'sigmoid'
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (s)
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c1)
c1 = BatchNormalization()(c1)
p1 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c1)
#p1 = Dropout(0.2)(p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c2)
c2 = BatchNormalization()(c2)
p2 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c2)
#p2 = Dropout(0.2)(p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c3)
c3 = BatchNormalization()(c3)
p3 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c3)
#p3 = Dropout(0.2)(p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c4)
c4 = BatchNormalization()(c4)
p4 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)) (c4)
#p4 = Dropout(0.2)(p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c5)
u6 = Conv2DTranspose(width*8, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c5)
u6 = concatenate([u6, c4])
#u6 = Dropout(0.2)(u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c6)
u7 = Conv2DTranspose(width*4, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c6)
u7 = concatenate([u7, c3])
#u7 = Dropout(0.2)(u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c7)
u8 = Conv2DTranspose(width*2, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c7)
u8 = concatenate([u8, c2])
#u8 = Dropout(0.2)(u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c8)
u9 = Conv2DTranspose(width, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c8)
u9 = concatenate([u9, c1], axis=3)
#u9 = Dropout(0.2)(u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c9)
outputs = Conv2D(num_classes, (1, 1), activation=activation) (c9)
model = Model(inputs=[inputs], outputs=[outputs])
What happens is the training loss very quickly approaches a plateau value (within 2 epochs) and the whole time val loss remains nan. I looked at other posts and some say it's because the dimension ordering is wrong. But if this were true, then i shouldn't be getting training loss either. Other reasons are that the value is diminishing due to learning rate. However, this reason too is offset by the fact that I am getting a loss for the training. What am I doing wrong?
keras neural-network
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
add a comment |
0
0
0
I am trying to apply batch normalization on an U-net and I have the following architecture:
inputs = Input((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS))
s = Lambda(lambda x: x / 255) (inputs)
width = 32
activation = 'sigmoid'
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (s)
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c1)
c1 = BatchNormalization()(c1)
p1 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c1)
#p1 = Dropout(0.2)(p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c2)
c2 = BatchNormalization()(c2)
p2 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c2)
#p2 = Dropout(0.2)(p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c3)
c3 = BatchNormalization()(c3)
p3 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c3)
#p3 = Dropout(0.2)(p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c4)
c4 = BatchNormalization()(c4)
p4 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)) (c4)
#p4 = Dropout(0.2)(p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c5)
u6 = Conv2DTranspose(width*8, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c5)
u6 = concatenate([u6, c4])
#u6 = Dropout(0.2)(u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c6)
u7 = Conv2DTranspose(width*4, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c6)
u7 = concatenate([u7, c3])
#u7 = Dropout(0.2)(u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c7)
u8 = Conv2DTranspose(width*2, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c7)
u8 = concatenate([u8, c2])
#u8 = Dropout(0.2)(u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c8)
u9 = Conv2DTranspose(width, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c8)
u9 = concatenate([u9, c1], axis=3)
#u9 = Dropout(0.2)(u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c9)
outputs = Conv2D(num_classes, (1, 1), activation=activation) (c9)
model = Model(inputs=[inputs], outputs=[outputs])
What happens is the training loss very quickly approaches a plateau value (within 2 epochs) and the whole time val loss remains nan. I looked at other posts and some say it's because the dimension ordering is wrong. But if this were true, then i shouldn't be getting training loss either. Other reasons are that the value is diminishing due to learning rate. However, this reason too is offset by the fact that I am getting a loss for the training. What am I doing wrong?
keras neural-network
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
I am trying to apply batch normalization on an U-net and I have the following architecture:
inputs = Input((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS))
s = Lambda(lambda x: x / 255) (inputs)
width = 32
activation = 'sigmoid'
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (s)
c1 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c1)
c1 = BatchNormalization()(c1)
p1 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c1)
#p1 = Dropout(0.2)(p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p1)
c2 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c2)
c2 = BatchNormalization()(c2)
p2 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c2)
#p2 = Dropout(0.2)(p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p2)
c3 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c3)
c3 = BatchNormalization()(c3)
p3 = MaxPooling2D((2, 2)) (c3)
#p3 = Dropout(0.2)(p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p3)
c4 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c4)
c4 = BatchNormalization()(c4)
p4 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)) (c4)
#p4 = Dropout(0.2)(p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (p4)
c5 = Conv2D(width*16, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c5)
u6 = Conv2DTranspose(width*8, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c5)
u6 = concatenate([u6, c4])
#u6 = Dropout(0.2)(u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u6)
c6 = Conv2D(width*8, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c6)
u7 = Conv2DTranspose(width*4, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c6)
u7 = concatenate([u7, c3])
#u7 = Dropout(0.2)(u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u7)
c7 = Conv2D(width*4, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c7)
u8 = Conv2DTranspose(width*2, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c7)
u8 = concatenate([u8, c2])
#u8 = Dropout(0.2)(u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u8)
c8 = Conv2D(width*2, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c8)
u9 = Conv2DTranspose(width, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same') (c8)
u9 = concatenate([u9, c1], axis=3)
#u9 = Dropout(0.2)(u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (u9)
c9 = Conv2D(width, (3, 3), activation='elu', padding='same') (c9)
outputs = Conv2D(num_classes, (1, 1), activation=activation) (c9)
model = Model(inputs=[inputs], outputs=[outputs])
What happens is the training loss very quickly approaches a plateau value (within 2 epochs) and the whole time val loss remains nan. I looked at other posts and some say it's because the dimension ordering is wrong. But if this were true, then i shouldn't be getting training loss either. Other reasons are that the value is diminishing due to learning rate. However, this reason too is offset by the fact that I am getting a loss for the training. What am I doing wrong?
keras neural-network
keras neural-network
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
asked Dec 30 '18 at 9:33
JonathanJonathan
422122
422122
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
if num_classes>1 your activation should be "softmax" and not "sigmoid" and then it'll probably work
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53976526%2ftraining-loss-is-available-but-val-loss-nan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
if num_classes>1 your activation should be "softmax" and not "sigmoid" and then it'll probably work
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
add a comment |
0
if num_classes>1 your activation should be "softmax" and not "sigmoid" and then it'll probably work
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
add a comment |
0
0
0
if num_classes>1 your activation should be "softmax" and not "sigmoid" and then it'll probably work
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
if num_classes>1 your activation should be "softmax" and not "sigmoid" and then it'll probably work
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:08
Jenia GolbsteinJenia Golbstein
1187
1187
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
add a comment |
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
I changed it to softmax, it still didn't work
– Jonathan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:49
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53976526%2ftraining-loss-is-available-but-val-loss-nan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
