Can anyone tell why my algorithm is wrong?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I was working on single source shortest path problem and I made a modification to bfs that can solve the problem. The algorithm runs in O(2E) times, I just can't understand why it is wrong (it must be otherwise dijstra's would not be most efficient algorithm).



def bfs_modified(G,src,des):
intialize d(src)=0, and d(!src) = inf
visited[all_vertex]=False
q=queue(src)

while q is not empty:
u=q.pop()
if(not visited[u]):
visited[u]=True
for all v connected to u:
q.insert(v)
if(d[v]>d[u]+adj[u][v]):
d[v]=d[u]+adj[u][v]
return d[des]









share|improve this question





























    0















    I was working on single source shortest path problem and I made a modification to bfs that can solve the problem. The algorithm runs in O(2E) times, I just can't understand why it is wrong (it must be otherwise dijstra's would not be most efficient algorithm).



    def bfs_modified(G,src,des):
    intialize d(src)=0, and d(!src) = inf
    visited[all_vertex]=False
    q=queue(src)

    while q is not empty:
    u=q.pop()
    if(not visited[u]):
    visited[u]=True
    for all v connected to u:
    q.insert(v)
    if(d[v]>d[u]+adj[u][v]):
    d[v]=d[u]+adj[u][v]
    return d[des]









    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I was working on single source shortest path problem and I made a modification to bfs that can solve the problem. The algorithm runs in O(2E) times, I just can't understand why it is wrong (it must be otherwise dijstra's would not be most efficient algorithm).



      def bfs_modified(G,src,des):
      intialize d(src)=0, and d(!src) = inf
      visited[all_vertex]=False
      q=queue(src)

      while q is not empty:
      u=q.pop()
      if(not visited[u]):
      visited[u]=True
      for all v connected to u:
      q.insert(v)
      if(d[v]>d[u]+adj[u][v]):
      d[v]=d[u]+adj[u][v]
      return d[des]









      share|improve this question














      I was working on single source shortest path problem and I made a modification to bfs that can solve the problem. The algorithm runs in O(2E) times, I just can't understand why it is wrong (it must be otherwise dijstra's would not be most efficient algorithm).



      def bfs_modified(G,src,des):
      intialize d(src)=0, and d(!src) = inf
      visited[all_vertex]=False
      q=queue(src)

      while q is not empty:
      u=q.pop()
      if(not visited[u]):
      visited[u]=True
      for all v connected to u:
      q.insert(v)
      if(d[v]>d[u]+adj[u][v]):
      d[v]=d[u]+adj[u][v]
      return d[des]






      algorithm shortest-path






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 3:04









      ASHUTOSH CHANDRAASHUTOSH CHANDRA

      11911




      11911
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          In Dijkstra's algorithm, the priority queue ensures that you don't process a vertex until you know it's distance from the source.



          BFS doesn't have this property. If the shortest path to a vertex has more than edges than the path with the fewest edges, then it will be processed too early.



          Consider this graph, for example, when you want the shortest path from S to T:



          S--5--C--1--T
          | |
          1 1
          | |
          A--1--B


          Vertex C will be visited before vertex B. You will think the distance to C is 5, because you haven't discovered the shorter path. When C is visited, it will assign a distance of 6 to T. This is incorrect, and will never be fixed, because C will not be visited again.






          share|improve this answer
























          • yea right ! thanks!!

            – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
            Jan 4 at 4:42












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54032633%2fcan-anyone-tell-why-my-algorithm-is-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          In Dijkstra's algorithm, the priority queue ensures that you don't process a vertex until you know it's distance from the source.



          BFS doesn't have this property. If the shortest path to a vertex has more than edges than the path with the fewest edges, then it will be processed too early.



          Consider this graph, for example, when you want the shortest path from S to T:



          S--5--C--1--T
          | |
          1 1
          | |
          A--1--B


          Vertex C will be visited before vertex B. You will think the distance to C is 5, because you haven't discovered the shorter path. When C is visited, it will assign a distance of 6 to T. This is incorrect, and will never be fixed, because C will not be visited again.






          share|improve this answer
























          • yea right ! thanks!!

            – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
            Jan 4 at 4:42
















          2














          In Dijkstra's algorithm, the priority queue ensures that you don't process a vertex until you know it's distance from the source.



          BFS doesn't have this property. If the shortest path to a vertex has more than edges than the path with the fewest edges, then it will be processed too early.



          Consider this graph, for example, when you want the shortest path from S to T:



          S--5--C--1--T
          | |
          1 1
          | |
          A--1--B


          Vertex C will be visited before vertex B. You will think the distance to C is 5, because you haven't discovered the shorter path. When C is visited, it will assign a distance of 6 to T. This is incorrect, and will never be fixed, because C will not be visited again.






          share|improve this answer
























          • yea right ! thanks!!

            – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
            Jan 4 at 4:42














          2












          2








          2







          In Dijkstra's algorithm, the priority queue ensures that you don't process a vertex until you know it's distance from the source.



          BFS doesn't have this property. If the shortest path to a vertex has more than edges than the path with the fewest edges, then it will be processed too early.



          Consider this graph, for example, when you want the shortest path from S to T:



          S--5--C--1--T
          | |
          1 1
          | |
          A--1--B


          Vertex C will be visited before vertex B. You will think the distance to C is 5, because you haven't discovered the shorter path. When C is visited, it will assign a distance of 6 to T. This is incorrect, and will never be fixed, because C will not be visited again.






          share|improve this answer













          In Dijkstra's algorithm, the priority queue ensures that you don't process a vertex until you know it's distance from the source.



          BFS doesn't have this property. If the shortest path to a vertex has more than edges than the path with the fewest edges, then it will be processed too early.



          Consider this graph, for example, when you want the shortest path from S to T:



          S--5--C--1--T
          | |
          1 1
          | |
          A--1--B


          Vertex C will be visited before vertex B. You will think the distance to C is 5, because you haven't discovered the shorter path. When C is visited, it will assign a distance of 6 to T. This is incorrect, and will never be fixed, because C will not be visited again.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 4 at 3:51









          Matt TimmermansMatt Timmermans

          21.4k11734




          21.4k11734













          • yea right ! thanks!!

            – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
            Jan 4 at 4:42



















          • yea right ! thanks!!

            – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
            Jan 4 at 4:42

















          yea right ! thanks!!

          – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
          Jan 4 at 4:42





          yea right ! thanks!!

          – ASHUTOSH CHANDRA
          Jan 4 at 4:42




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54032633%2fcan-anyone-tell-why-my-algorithm-is-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Monofisismo

          Angular Downloading a file using contenturl with Basic Authentication

          Olmecas