Why does order between UseStaticFiles and UseDefaultFiles matter?
I understand that the order of registration for middleware may matter. However, it's not given that it's necessarily the case.
I noticed that UseDefaultFiles() needs to precede UseStaticFiles() (which can neatly be circumvented by UseFileServer()).
What I don't understand is why. How do they collide?!
I've googled the issue but got zero motivation on why the order is significant in this particular case. Only that it is of importance...
c# .net-core asp.net-core-2.2
add a comment |
I understand that the order of registration for middleware may matter. However, it's not given that it's necessarily the case.
I noticed that UseDefaultFiles() needs to precede UseStaticFiles() (which can neatly be circumvented by UseFileServer()).
What I don't understand is why. How do they collide?!
I've googled the issue but got zero motivation on why the order is significant in this particular case. Only that it is of importance...
c# .net-core asp.net-core-2.2
add a comment |
I understand that the order of registration for middleware may matter. However, it's not given that it's necessarily the case.
I noticed that UseDefaultFiles() needs to precede UseStaticFiles() (which can neatly be circumvented by UseFileServer()).
What I don't understand is why. How do they collide?!
I've googled the issue but got zero motivation on why the order is significant in this particular case. Only that it is of importance...
c# .net-core asp.net-core-2.2
I understand that the order of registration for middleware may matter. However, it's not given that it's necessarily the case.
I noticed that UseDefaultFiles() needs to precede UseStaticFiles() (which can neatly be circumvented by UseFileServer()).
What I don't understand is why. How do they collide?!
I've googled the issue but got zero motivation on why the order is significant in this particular case. Only that it is of importance...
c# .net-core asp.net-core-2.2
c# .net-core asp.net-core-2.2
asked Dec 31 '18 at 15:07
Konrad VilterstenKonrad Viltersten
12.5k32134256
12.5k32134256
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Taken from the documentation on Static files in ASP.NET Core (under Serve a default document, there's an important note).
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
Based on this, it's important to first setup the URL rewriter (UseDefaultFiles
) before serving the actual file (UseStaticFiles
).
If you don't, the UseStaticFiles
middleware will kick in first, but a request to the root of the application won't tell the middleware which 'file' to serve. When you make sure the rewrite is in place first, a request to the root of the application will have been rewritten to be a request for (one of the) default file(s).
add a comment |
From the docs:
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
The order of middleware does matter, this is why, for example, UseStaticFiles
has to come before UseMvc
as the MVC engine will handle all of the requests. In this case, UseDefaultFiles
is simply rewriting the URL and passing it on to the UseStaticFiles
middleware to serve.
add a comment |
UseDefaultFiles() should always be before UseStaticFiles().
This is because UseDefaultFiles rewrite the URLs. Use Static files only serves the URLs.
If serving of document happens earlier than URL rewrite, then you may not get default document served.
Refernece:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/static-files?view=aspnetcore-2.2#serve-a-default-document
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53988848%2fwhy-does-order-between-usestaticfiles-and-usedefaultfiles-matter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Taken from the documentation on Static files in ASP.NET Core (under Serve a default document, there's an important note).
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
Based on this, it's important to first setup the URL rewriter (UseDefaultFiles
) before serving the actual file (UseStaticFiles
).
If you don't, the UseStaticFiles
middleware will kick in first, but a request to the root of the application won't tell the middleware which 'file' to serve. When you make sure the rewrite is in place first, a request to the root of the application will have been rewritten to be a request for (one of the) default file(s).
add a comment |
Taken from the documentation on Static files in ASP.NET Core (under Serve a default document, there's an important note).
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
Based on this, it's important to first setup the URL rewriter (UseDefaultFiles
) before serving the actual file (UseStaticFiles
).
If you don't, the UseStaticFiles
middleware will kick in first, but a request to the root of the application won't tell the middleware which 'file' to serve. When you make sure the rewrite is in place first, a request to the root of the application will have been rewritten to be a request for (one of the) default file(s).
add a comment |
Taken from the documentation on Static files in ASP.NET Core (under Serve a default document, there's an important note).
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
Based on this, it's important to first setup the URL rewriter (UseDefaultFiles
) before serving the actual file (UseStaticFiles
).
If you don't, the UseStaticFiles
middleware will kick in first, but a request to the root of the application won't tell the middleware which 'file' to serve. When you make sure the rewrite is in place first, a request to the root of the application will have been rewritten to be a request for (one of the) default file(s).
Taken from the documentation on Static files in ASP.NET Core (under Serve a default document, there's an important note).
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
Based on this, it's important to first setup the URL rewriter (UseDefaultFiles
) before serving the actual file (UseStaticFiles
).
If you don't, the UseStaticFiles
middleware will kick in first, but a request to the root of the application won't tell the middleware which 'file' to serve. When you make sure the rewrite is in place first, a request to the root of the application will have been rewritten to be a request for (one of the) default file(s).
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:28
rickvdboschrickvdbosch
4,05621526
4,05621526
add a comment |
add a comment |
From the docs:
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
The order of middleware does matter, this is why, for example, UseStaticFiles
has to come before UseMvc
as the MVC engine will handle all of the requests. In this case, UseDefaultFiles
is simply rewriting the URL and passing it on to the UseStaticFiles
middleware to serve.
add a comment |
From the docs:
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
The order of middleware does matter, this is why, for example, UseStaticFiles
has to come before UseMvc
as the MVC engine will handle all of the requests. In this case, UseDefaultFiles
is simply rewriting the URL and passing it on to the UseStaticFiles
middleware to serve.
add a comment |
From the docs:
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
The order of middleware does matter, this is why, for example, UseStaticFiles
has to come before UseMvc
as the MVC engine will handle all of the requests. In this case, UseDefaultFiles
is simply rewriting the URL and passing it on to the UseStaticFiles
middleware to serve.
From the docs:
UseDefaultFiles
must be called beforeUseStaticFiles
to serve the default file.UseDefaultFiles
is a URL rewriter that doesn't actually serve the file. Enable Static File Middleware viaUseStaticFiles
to serve the file.
The order of middleware does matter, this is why, for example, UseStaticFiles
has to come before UseMvc
as the MVC engine will handle all of the requests. In this case, UseDefaultFiles
is simply rewriting the URL and passing it on to the UseStaticFiles
middleware to serve.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:26
DavidGDavidG
70.2k9111129
70.2k9111129
add a comment |
add a comment |
UseDefaultFiles() should always be before UseStaticFiles().
This is because UseDefaultFiles rewrite the URLs. Use Static files only serves the URLs.
If serving of document happens earlier than URL rewrite, then you may not get default document served.
Refernece:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/static-files?view=aspnetcore-2.2#serve-a-default-document
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
add a comment |
UseDefaultFiles() should always be before UseStaticFiles().
This is because UseDefaultFiles rewrite the URLs. Use Static files only serves the URLs.
If serving of document happens earlier than URL rewrite, then you may not get default document served.
Refernece:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/static-files?view=aspnetcore-2.2#serve-a-default-document
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
add a comment |
UseDefaultFiles() should always be before UseStaticFiles().
This is because UseDefaultFiles rewrite the URLs. Use Static files only serves the URLs.
If serving of document happens earlier than URL rewrite, then you may not get default document served.
Refernece:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/static-files?view=aspnetcore-2.2#serve-a-default-document
UseDefaultFiles() should always be before UseStaticFiles().
This is because UseDefaultFiles rewrite the URLs. Use Static files only serves the URLs.
If serving of document happens earlier than URL rewrite, then you may not get default document served.
Refernece:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/static-files?view=aspnetcore-2.2#serve-a-default-document
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:26
Manoj ChoudhariManoj Choudhari
1,5341516
1,5341516
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
add a comment |
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
I thought that UseStaticFiles() set the flag to true to enable non-dynamical files to be accessible. As such, I can't see the problem in allowing the static files to be obtainable and then, in case the URL isn't pointing out an actual files, try to add index.html, default.html etc. What do you think?
– Konrad Viltersten
Jan 1 at 0:51
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
In my opinion, we will have to understand how asp.net serves the files. The file serving middleware just maps actual url to the site resources. Once resources to be served is decided , it doesn't matter of the url stays same or it is rewritten. The sole purpose of url is done by that time. Just consider that if url is changed after checking the resources it may map to, then somehow framework will again have to handover request to previous module to serve contents. This may cause either code duplication, or performance issues as resource mapping has to be done twice.
– Manoj Choudhari
Jan 1 at 9:09
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53988848%2fwhy-does-order-between-usestaticfiles-and-usedefaultfiles-matter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown