Table Formatting using siunitx
I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]
). Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
However, here is my result:
The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}
; the S
type will not allow that.
tables siunitx
add a comment |
I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]
). Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
However, here is my result:
The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}
; the S
type will not allow that.
tables siunitx
3
you need{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data
– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never usedsiunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
1
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form ofdeca
(deka
works too...) isda
, notD
.
– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41
add a comment |
I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]
). Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
However, here is my result:
The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}
; the S
type will not allow that.
tables siunitx
I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]
). Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
However, here is my result:
The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}
; the S
type will not allow that.
tables siunitx
tables siunitx
asked Jan 4 at 15:49
Aiden KennyAiden Kenny
4917
4917
3
you need{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data
– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never usedsiunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
1
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form ofdeca
(deka
works too...) isda
, notD
.
– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41
add a comment |
3
you need{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data
– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never usedsiunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
1
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form ofdeca
(deka
works too...) isda
, notD
.
– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41
3
3
you need
{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
you need
{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used
siunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used
siunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
1
1
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of
deca
(deka
works too...) is da
, not D
.– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of
deca
(deka
works too...) is da
, not D
.– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2]
to S[table-format=10.9]
and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor
in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx
.
In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro}
instead of $mu$
in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx
package, why not (d) use the S
column type for the final column as well and write e9
thru e-9
instead of $10^9$
thru $10^{-9}$
?
A separate observation: the standard short form of deca
(or deka
) is da
, not D
. For sure, si{deca}
(si{deka}
works too...) produces da
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468585%2ftable-formatting-using-siunitx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2]
to S[table-format=10.9]
and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor
in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx
.
In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro}
instead of $mu$
in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx
package, why not (d) use the S
column type for the final column as well and write e9
thru e-9
instead of $10^9$
thru $10^{-9}$
?
A separate observation: the standard short form of deca
(or deka
) is da
, not D
. For sure, si{deca}
(si{deka}
works too...) produces da
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
add a comment |
As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2]
to S[table-format=10.9]
and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor
in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx
.
In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro}
instead of $mu$
in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx
package, why not (d) use the S
column type for the final column as well and write e9
thru e-9
instead of $10^9$
thru $10^{-9}$
?
A separate observation: the standard short form of deca
(or deka
) is da
, not D
. For sure, si{deca}
(si{deka}
works too...) produces da
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
add a comment |
As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2]
to S[table-format=10.9]
and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor
in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx
.
In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro}
instead of $mu$
in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx
package, why not (d) use the S
column type for the final column as well and write e9
thru e-9
instead of $10^9$
thru $10^{-9}$
?
A separate observation: the standard short form of deca
(or deka
) is da
, not D
. For sure, si{deca}
(si{deka}
works too...) produces da
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2]
to S[table-format=10.9]
and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor
in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx
.
In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro}
instead of $mu$
in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx
package, why not (d) use the S
column type for the final column as well and write e9
thru e-9
instead of $10^9$
thru $10^{-9}$
?
A separate observation: the standard short form of deca
(or deka
) is da
, not D
. For sure, si{deca}
(si{deka}
works too...) produces da
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}
answered Jan 4 at 16:30
MicoMico
288k32394781
288k32394781
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
add a comment |
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
2
2
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468585%2ftable-formatting-using-siunitx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
you need
{...}
around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59
How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used
siunitx
before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03
It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07
1
Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of
deca
(deka
works too...) isda
, notD
.– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15
Good point... I was not aware of this
– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41